《宪法》第四十六条适用的教育阶段辨析

发布时间：2018-07-24 07:56

【摘要】：导源于齐玉苓案件的"宪法司法化"的争论虽然取得了遵守性援引宪法的初步共识,但仍然没有解决《宪法》第46条适用于哪些教育阶段的问题。考究该条对权利义务的同时规定、对比相关法条对权利义务的规定、追问受教育义务的落实和受教育权利的实现、考虑体系解释时相关法条之间存在无法粘合的缝隙,可以初步确定其只能适用于义务教育阶段。考察"八二修宪报告"的特定情境,应当对其受教育阶段的说明作限缩性理解,即回归第46条的本意。在齐玉苓案中,山东省高级人民法院的判决不但越权,而且作为判决依据所引第46条于中等专科教育阶段也是错误的。
[Abstract]:Although the controversy of "constitution judicalization" derived from Qi Yuling's case has obtained the preliminary consensus of invoking the constitution by compliance, it still has not solved the question of which educational stage Article 46 of the Constitution applies to. This article provides for the rights and obligations at the same time, contrasts the provisions of the relevant laws and regulations on the rights and obligations, asks the implementation of the obligation to receive education and the realization of the right to education, considering the system of interpretation between the relevant laws and articles can not be glued between the gap, It can be preliminarily determined that it can only be applied to the compulsory education stage. In order to investigate the specific situation of the "8 ~ 2 Amendment report", we should make a limited understanding of the explanation of the educational stage, that is, to return to the original meaning of Article 46. In the case of Qi Yuling, the judgment of Shandong Provincial higher people's Court not only exceeded its authority, but also was wrong in the stage of secondary college education cited as the basis for the judgment.
【作者单位】：惠州学院政治法律系;吉林大学法学博士后科研流动站;
【基金】：2010年广东省哲学社会科学规划项目“教育行政案件司法审查研究”(项目号GD10YFX04)的阶段性研究成果 2014年中国博士后科学基金第56批面上一等资助(资助号2014M560230)
【分类号】：D921;D922.16

【参考文献】