我国专利权用尽原则适用研究
发布时间：2018-10-22 17:24
【摘要】：专利技术是发明创造人智慧尤其是创造性的结晶，为了尊重和鼓励发明创造人的智力成果，各个国家的法律纷纷赋予发明创造人一定的权利--专利权，即未经专利权人的同意或许可，任何人不得以生产经营目的实施其专利技术。国家进行专利法立法在鼓励、保护发明创造人的创造积极性的同时，更重要的目的是推动发明创造的应用，提高创新能力，促进科学技术进步和经济社会发展。专利权是一种垄断权，这种垄断权是以牺牲社会公众对专利技术自由使用为代价的。为了平衡专利权人与国家、社会以及专利产品所有人之间的利益，促进专利技术和专利产品在全社会中的利用和流通，很多国家对专利权人的权利设置了不同程度的限制。英国采用默示许可（implied license）理论来对专利权进行限制，美国却综合运用首次销售穷竭原则（first sale exhaustion）和默示许可（impliedlicense）理论对专利权进行限制，而德国主要运用专利权用尽原则，在实践中也不排除适用默示许可理论来运作。 我国对专利权进行限制的制度吸取了德国经验，却没有完全借用德国模式。现行《专利法》第六十九条具体列举五种不视为侵犯专利权的行为，对专利权的效力进行了限制，其中第一种不侵权行为被称为专利权用尽原则。专利权用尽原则的理论基础主要是“默示许可理论”和“专利权用尽理论”，我国只采用了“专利权用尽理论”--专利权用尽原则是对专利权的一种本质性的限定，，不论是否存在其它的限制性条件，都不能排除该原则的适用。随着我国科学技术的不断提高，知识产权保护意识也越来越强，法律实践也逐渐注入新鲜的元素，由于现行专利法没有明确规定关于方法专利及获得强制许可后售出的专利产品或者依照专利方法直接获得的产品是否适用专利权用尽原则，让我国司法实践无法可依。 本文正文分为三个部分： 第一章主要是叙述我国专利权用尽原则的适用现状。本章对专利权用尽的概念、我国关于该原则立法上的发展，专利权用尽原则的理论基础及专利权用尽原则的适用做了详细描述，并提出了我国专利权用尽原则在适用中出现的问题。 第二章主要是对专利权用尽原则的适用分析。本章以美国的两个判例为例分析方法专利适用专利权用尽原则的必要性，最后以欧盟的一个关于强制许可适用专利权用尽原则的案例来引出我国学者对其的态度。 第三章是笔者针对我国立法和司法的缺陷所提出的完善我国专利权用尽原则规定的建议。建议借鉴国外立法和司法实践经验。
[Abstract]:Patent technology is the crystallization of human intelligence, especially creativity. In order to respect and encourage the intellectual achievements of inventives and creators, the laws of various countries have given the invention-creators a certain right-patent rights, in order to respect and encourage the intellectual achievements of invention-creators. Without the consent or permission of the patentee, no one shall carry out his patented technology for the purpose of production and business. The more important purpose of the patent law legislation is to promote the application of invention and creation, improve the ability of innovation, and promote the progress of science and technology and the development of economy and society, while encouraging and protecting the initiative of invention and creation. Patent right is a kind of monopoly right, which is at the expense of the public to use patent technology freely. In order to balance the interests between the patentee and the state, the society and the owner of patent products, and to promote the utilization and circulation of patent technology and patent products in the whole society, many countries have set restrictions on the rights of patentees to varying degrees. The United Kingdom uses the theory of implied license (implied license) to restrict patent rights, while the United States uses the principle of exhaustion of first sale (first sale exhaustion) and the theory of implied license (impliedlicense) to restrict patent rights, while Germany mainly uses the principle of patent exhaustion. In practice, also does not rule out the application of implied licensing theory to operate. The system of restricting patent rights in our country draws on German experience, but does not borrow German model completely. Article 69 of the current Patent Law specifically lists five acts which are not regarded as infringement of the patent right and limits the validity of the patent right. The first kind of non-infringement act is called the principle of patent exhaustion. The theoretical basis of the principle of patent exhaustion is mainly "implied license theory" and "patent exhaustion theory". China only adopts "patent exhaustion theory"-the principle of patent exhaustion is a kind of essential limitation to patent right. Whether or not other restrictive conditions exist, the application of the principle cannot be ruled out. With the continuous improvement of science and technology in our country, the consciousness of intellectual property protection is becoming stronger and stronger, and the legal practice is gradually infusing fresh elements. Due to the fact that the current patent law does not clearly stipulate whether the principle of patent exhaustion is applicable to the method patent and the patented product sold after obtaining the compulsory license or the product obtained directly according to the patent method, the judicial practice in our country cannot be followed. This paper is divided into three parts: the first chapter mainly describes the application of the patent exhaustion principle in China. This chapter gives a detailed description of the concept of patent exhaustion, the legislative development of this principle, the theoretical basis of the principle of patent exhaustion and the application of the principle of patent exhaustion. And put forward the problem of patent exhaustion principle in our country. The second chapter mainly analyzes the application of patent exhaustion principle. This chapter takes two American cases as an example to analyze the necessity of patent application of the principle of patent exhaustion. Finally, this chapter draws the attitude of Chinese scholars on the application of the principle of patent exhaustion in a case of compulsory licensing in the European Union. The third chapter is the author's suggestion to perfect the principle of patent exhaustion in view of the defects of our legislation and judicature. It is suggested that foreign legislative and judicial practice should be used for reference.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.42
本文编号：2287819
[Abstract]:Patent technology is the crystallization of human intelligence, especially creativity. In order to respect and encourage the intellectual achievements of inventives and creators, the laws of various countries have given the invention-creators a certain right-patent rights, in order to respect and encourage the intellectual achievements of invention-creators. Without the consent or permission of the patentee, no one shall carry out his patented technology for the purpose of production and business. The more important purpose of the patent law legislation is to promote the application of invention and creation, improve the ability of innovation, and promote the progress of science and technology and the development of economy and society, while encouraging and protecting the initiative of invention and creation. Patent right is a kind of monopoly right, which is at the expense of the public to use patent technology freely. In order to balance the interests between the patentee and the state, the society and the owner of patent products, and to promote the utilization and circulation of patent technology and patent products in the whole society, many countries have set restrictions on the rights of patentees to varying degrees. The United Kingdom uses the theory of implied license (implied license) to restrict patent rights, while the United States uses the principle of exhaustion of first sale (first sale exhaustion) and the theory of implied license (impliedlicense) to restrict patent rights, while Germany mainly uses the principle of patent exhaustion. In practice, also does not rule out the application of implied licensing theory to operate. The system of restricting patent rights in our country draws on German experience, but does not borrow German model completely. Article 69 of the current Patent Law specifically lists five acts which are not regarded as infringement of the patent right and limits the validity of the patent right. The first kind of non-infringement act is called the principle of patent exhaustion. The theoretical basis of the principle of patent exhaustion is mainly "implied license theory" and "patent exhaustion theory". China only adopts "patent exhaustion theory"-the principle of patent exhaustion is a kind of essential limitation to patent right. Whether or not other restrictive conditions exist, the application of the principle cannot be ruled out. With the continuous improvement of science and technology in our country, the consciousness of intellectual property protection is becoming stronger and stronger, and the legal practice is gradually infusing fresh elements. Due to the fact that the current patent law does not clearly stipulate whether the principle of patent exhaustion is applicable to the method patent and the patented product sold after obtaining the compulsory license or the product obtained directly according to the patent method, the judicial practice in our country cannot be followed. This paper is divided into three parts: the first chapter mainly describes the application of the patent exhaustion principle in China. This chapter gives a detailed description of the concept of patent exhaustion, the legislative development of this principle, the theoretical basis of the principle of patent exhaustion and the application of the principle of patent exhaustion. And put forward the problem of patent exhaustion principle in our country. The second chapter mainly analyzes the application of patent exhaustion principle. This chapter takes two American cases as an example to analyze the necessity of patent application of the principle of patent exhaustion. Finally, this chapter draws the attitude of Chinese scholars on the application of the principle of patent exhaustion in a case of compulsory licensing in the European Union. The third chapter is the author's suggestion to perfect the principle of patent exhaustion in view of the defects of our legislation and judicature. It is suggested that foreign legislative and judicial practice should be used for reference.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.42
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 吴汉东;法哲学家对知识产权法的哲学解读[J];法商研究;2003年05期
2 杨红军;赵加兵;;专利权权利用尽原则研究[J];公民与法(法学版);2011年07期
3 费艳颖;杨超;;论专利权之权利用尽原则——以2004年DVD专利费纠纷案为例[J];哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版);2007年02期
4 任军民;;我国专利权权利用尽原则的理论体系[J];法学研究;2006年06期
5 田明;外观设计专利侵权中的几个法律问题——从一件外观设计专利侵权纠纷案谈起[J];知识产权;2004年02期
6 张玲;;专利产品的修理与专利侵权问题探讨——从日本再生墨盒案谈起[J];知识产权;2007年03期
7 万琦;;美国专利权用尽原则规范属性之辨析[J];知识产权;2012年03期
8 张强;刘正;;我国适应专利权穷竭原则及构想[J];行政与法;2013年05期
9 石必胜;;专利权用尽视角下专利产品修理与再造的区分[J];知识产权;2013年06期
本文编号：2287819
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2287819.html
