知识产权滥用的反垄断规制问题研究
发布时间:2019-02-12 17:36
【摘要】:知识产权作为一种专有权利,具有垄断的合法性,但是如果权利人在垄断的过程中不适当的行使权利,就会造成知识产权滥用。知识产权滥用会扰乱健康的市场竞争秩序,破坏公平的市场竞争环境,所以必须严格规范知识产权滥用行为。我国用以规范权利人滥用知识产权行为的反垄断法尚处于萌芽状态,其他用以规制这一问题的法律也大多具有内容不系统,实行力度较弱等问题。因此,对我国用反垄断法规制知识产权滥用的研究就显得尤为必要。本文主要通过四部分内容对这一问题进行阐述: 第一章,着眼于知识产权的垄断,进而引出知识产权滥用问题,概括知识产权滥用的含义、具体表现及反垄断法与知识产权滥用之间的关系。 第二章,,讨论了发达国家和地区对知识产权滥用的反垄断规制历程,并对此进行概括总结,得出对我国用反垄断法规制知识产权滥用的先进经验。 第三章,对我国知识产权滥用的反垄断规制现状进行分析,指出存在的缺陷和不足。 第四章,建议我国分别从立法、执法、司法、理念等四个层面完善知识产权滥用的反垄断规制:一是构建完善的立法体系;二是设立专门的执法机构;三是增加知识产权滥用的刑事责任制度;四是增强反垄断意识。
[Abstract]:As a kind of exclusive right, intellectual property has the legitimacy of monopoly, but if the right holder does not exercise the right properly in the process of monopoly, it will cause the abuse of intellectual property. The abuse of intellectual property rights will disturb the healthy market competition order and destroy the fair market competition environment, so we must strictly regulate the abuse of intellectual property rights. In China, the anti-monopoly law used to regulate the abuse of intellectual property rights is still in its infancy, and most of the other laws used to regulate this issue have some problems, such as unsystematic content and weak enforcement. Therefore, it is necessary to regulate the abuse of intellectual property by anti-monopoly law in China. This paper mainly discusses this problem through four parts: the first chapter focuses on the monopoly of intellectual property, and then leads to the problem of abuse of intellectual property, and generalizes the meaning of abuse of intellectual property. The concrete manifestation and the relation between the anti-monopoly law and the abuse of intellectual property. The second chapter discusses the course of anti-monopoly regulation of intellectual property abuse in developed countries and regions, and summarizes it, and draws the advanced experience of regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights by anti-monopoly law in China. The third chapter analyzes the current situation of anti-monopoly regulation of intellectual property abuse in China and points out the defects and shortcomings. In the fourth chapter, it is suggested that our country should perfect the anti-monopoly regulation of intellectual property abuse from four aspects of legislation, law enforcement, judicature and concept: one is to construct a perfect legislative system, the other is to set up a special law enforcement agency. Third, increase the criminal liability system of intellectual property abuse; fourth, enhance anti-monopoly consciousness.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D923.4;D922.294
本文编号:2420636
[Abstract]:As a kind of exclusive right, intellectual property has the legitimacy of monopoly, but if the right holder does not exercise the right properly in the process of monopoly, it will cause the abuse of intellectual property. The abuse of intellectual property rights will disturb the healthy market competition order and destroy the fair market competition environment, so we must strictly regulate the abuse of intellectual property rights. In China, the anti-monopoly law used to regulate the abuse of intellectual property rights is still in its infancy, and most of the other laws used to regulate this issue have some problems, such as unsystematic content and weak enforcement. Therefore, it is necessary to regulate the abuse of intellectual property by anti-monopoly law in China. This paper mainly discusses this problem through four parts: the first chapter focuses on the monopoly of intellectual property, and then leads to the problem of abuse of intellectual property, and generalizes the meaning of abuse of intellectual property. The concrete manifestation and the relation between the anti-monopoly law and the abuse of intellectual property. The second chapter discusses the course of anti-monopoly regulation of intellectual property abuse in developed countries and regions, and summarizes it, and draws the advanced experience of regulating the abuse of intellectual property rights by anti-monopoly law in China. The third chapter analyzes the current situation of anti-monopoly regulation of intellectual property abuse in China and points out the defects and shortcomings. In the fourth chapter, it is suggested that our country should perfect the anti-monopoly regulation of intellectual property abuse from four aspects of legislation, law enforcement, judicature and concept: one is to construct a perfect legislative system, the other is to set up a special law enforcement agency. Third, increase the criminal liability system of intellectual property abuse; fourth, enhance anti-monopoly consciousness.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:D923.4;D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 伍静;知识产权垄断与反垄断立法分析[J];当代法学;2004年05期
2 沈木珠,解薇薇;中国知识产权领域的反垄断立法思考——从中国企业面临的知识产权危机谈起[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2005年03期
3 宁立志;论反垄断法对专利权行使的规制[J];法学杂志;2005年01期
4 王先林;;从微软垄断案看知识产权滥用的反垄断控制[J];法学家;2001年03期
5 张伟君;单晓光;;WTO框架下完善我国知识产权滥用规制制度的若干思考[J];法学家;2008年02期
6 王先林;略论竞争法对跨国公司知识产权滥用的规制[J];中国工商管理研究;2005年04期
7 朱淑娣;;中美知识产权反垄断限制规范比较研究——兼议国际知识产权博弈中的合法利益争取[J];中国工商管理研究;2009年10期
8 王先林;;知识产权滥用的反垄断法规制问题论纲[J];经济法论坛;2004年00期
9 张瑞萍;反垄断法应如何对待知识产权[J];清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年04期
10 朱慈蕴;反思反垄断:我国应当建立温和型的反垄断制度[J];清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年02期
本文编号:2420636
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/zhishichanquanfa/2420636.html