转型社会中运动式治理的价值探讨——以元镇环境治理为例
发布时间:2018-03-08 18:37
本文选题:转型社会 切入点:运动式治理 出处:《南京农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:在当前中国社会转型背景下,运动式治理有其特定价值。文章以废旧塑料产业环境治理为例,从"内"(科层组织体系)与"外"(治理对象所处社会结构)两方面着手探讨它们如何互动以彰显运动式治理的价值。通过比较第一阶段"去问题化"的低效和第二阶段"全面取缔"的有效环境治理策略,研究发现:科层组织所面临的激励环境、当地社会产业结构形态共同影响政府运动式治理的政策实施过程,这种实践也会反向形塑科层组织体系与调整当地产业结构,最终影响治理结果走向。即当治理议题处于强政治激励,且政府治理的方向与社会产业转型、民众认知方向一致时,治理能有效调整当地经济结构与改善生态环境。由此,在社会转型的复杂环境下,社会治理应当转变对象观以及考虑治理对象所属的社会环境,以提升治理成效。
[Abstract]:In the context of the current social transformation in China, sports governance has its specific value. This paper takes the environmental management of waste plastics industry as an example. This paper discusses how to interact between "inside" and "outside" (the social structure of governance objects) in order to demonstrate the value of sport governance. By comparing the inefficiency and the first stage of "deproblemization" in the first stage, the paper discusses how they interact with each other in order to demonstrate the value of sports governance. The effective environmental governance strategy of the two-stage "total ban", It is found that the incentive environment and the form of local social industrial structure together affect the policy implementation process of government's movement-style governance, and this practice will also reverse shape the organization system and adjust the local industrial structure. The final influence on the direction of governance results is that governance can effectively adjust the local economic structure and improve the ecological environment when the governance issues are in a strong political incentive, and when the direction of government governance is in line with the transformation of social industries and the cognitive direction of the people, governance can effectively adjust the local economic structure and improve the ecological environment. In the complex environment of social transformation, social governance should change the object view and consider the social environment to which the governance object belongs, in order to improve the governance effect.
【作者单位】: 河海大学社会学系;
【基金】:江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目“基层政府与农副产品网络销售研究”(KYZZ15_0156) 江苏省第四期333工程科研资助项目“公益创投基层服务成效及组织运作逻辑”(BRA2015404)
【分类号】:F426.72;F713.2;X322
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 曹凤中;;环境保护运动式执法模式剖析[J];中国环境法治;2007年00期
2 刘效仁;淮河治污:运动式治理的败笔[J];生态经济;2004年08期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 刘效仁;淮河治污:运动式治理的败笔[N];经理日报;2004年
2 钱兆成;运动式治污不可取[N];中国环境报;2013年
3 本报特约评论员 邓清波;治雾霾要靠“主动式”不搞“运动式”[N];济南日报;2013年
,本文编号:1585081
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/gongshangguanlilunwen/1585081.html