中国PPP市场扩大对外开放的成本收益分析

发布时间：2018-03-11 17:44

本文选题：PPP　切入点：开放　出处：《贵州社会科学》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：随着中国城镇化进程的不断加快,基础设施建设和公共服务领域存在巨大需求,面对较大的资金缺口,PPP模式作为政府公共治理的工具之一,也是引入社会资本解决这一问题的动员机制,其中通过开放PPP市场等形式吸引外资参与国内经济建设,无疑是一条比较重要的途径。而PPP市场对外开放道路的选择是成本与收益相交替的过程,虽然PPP市场对外开放的成本与收益与具体PPP项目相比较难通过定量衡量,但是市场开放的成本与收益是制定和实施对外开放战略的前提和基础,政府可结合各种直接和间接影响因素,通过成本收益分析评估政策,分析相关政策的可行性,为PPP市场扩大对外开放问题的分析和政策的制定提供思路。基于中国的特殊国情,中国PPP市场进一步对外开放无法完全借鉴其他国家或地区的开放经验和做法,需要结合PPP市场发展情况、宏观经济环境、行业及市场主体发展水平等现实因素,合理、稳妥地推进。
[Abstract]:With the accelerating process of urbanization in China, there is a huge demand in the field of infrastructure construction and public service. In the face of a large funding gap, PPP model is one of the tools of government public governance. It is also a mobilization mechanism for introducing social capital to solve this problem. Among them, through opening up the PPP market and other forms, attracting foreign investment to participate in domestic economic construction. Undoubtedly, it is an important way to open the PPP market to the outside world. However, the choice of the way of opening up to the outside world of PPP is a process of alternating cost and profit, although the cost and benefit of opening up to the outside world of PPP market are difficult to measure quantitatively with specific PPP projects. However, the cost and benefit of market opening is the premise and foundation of formulating and implementing the strategy of opening to the outside world. The government can analyze the feasibility of the relevant policy by cost-benefit analysis and evaluation of the policy by combining all kinds of direct and indirect influencing factors. This paper provides ideas for the analysis of PPP market opening to the outside world and the formulation of policies. Based on China's special national conditions, China's PPP market opening to the outside world can not completely draw lessons from the opening experience and practices of other countries or regions. It is necessary to combine the development of PPP market, macroeconomic environment, industry and market main body development level and other realistic factors, reasonably and steadily.
【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“我国经济安全底线设定及实施策略研究”(16CJY004)
【分类号】：F283;F125;F285

【相似文献】