作为“后锋”的“建构”读解

发布时间：2018-02-28 06:23

本文关键词： 建构后锋消解批判实践　出处：《天津大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：肯尼思·弗兰普顿重提“建构”文化研究为建筑学术界找到了创建学科自主性的契机,但同时,这种渴望清理出一个彻底摆脱意识形态控制的本体文化的迫切心态,使许多学者并能未充分理解“建构”提出的深厚背景及其本身所具有的复杂性和批判张力,这导致“建构”研究目前在中国仍停留在一种现代理性主义的知识体系内,其现象学的批判实践性在这种压制的状态下未能发挥其应有的活力。另一个问题是,目前对“建构”的读解多追求一种典型性或纪念性,其无疑极大程度缩窄了“建构”研究的丰富度,也使它承担了过于鲜明的表现任务。因此,本文将试图站在“抵抗建筑学”的“后锋”立场,破除那种以“建构”谈建构的理论内视角,在人类学和语言学的层面,将其视作一种“建造”的“构成活动”,以“消解”式的读解方式还原“建构”文化的广泛视域,并以方法论的批判将建构真正引向一种精密的语言读解和制作中。因为此特殊视角,本文将尽量避免推演式的论述方式,而尝试一次跨学科、跨理论的写作。文章将从广泛的建构营造活动入手,贯穿前现代、现代和后现代的不同视角,在学科内与外,“建造”与“诗意”、“先锋”与“后锋”、“理论”与“实践”、“宏观”与“精密”、“不在场”与“在场”等概念的对话中搭建起一个多维视域,以期对建构文化研究的学者有一定启示作用。
[Abstract]:Kenneth Frampton repeats the idea that "constructive" cultural research provides the architectural academic community with an opportunity to create discipline autonomy, but at the same time, this desire to clean up an urgent mindset of the ontological culture that is completely free from ideological control. So that many scholars can not fully understand the profound background of "construction" and its complexity and critical tension, which leads to the fact that the study of "construction" is still in the knowledge system of modern rationalism in China. Its phenomenological criticism and practice failed to give play to its proper vitality in this state of repression. Another problem is that the interpretation of "construction" at present pursues a kind of typicality or memoriality. Undoubtedly, it greatly narrows the richness of the study of "construction" and makes it take on the task of expressing itself too clearly. Therefore, this paper will try to stand on the "rear front" position of "resistance architecture". From the perspective of the theory of "construction", we regard it as a kind of "constructive activity" in anthropology and linguistics, and restore the extensive horizon of "construction" culture by "dispelling" the way of reading. And the criticism of methodology will lead to the construction of a precise language interpretation and production. Because of this special perspective, this paper will try to avoid the deductive way of discourse, and try to cross the subject. The article will start with extensive construction activities and run through the different perspectives of pre-modern, modern and post-modern. Within and outside the discipline, a multidimensional horizon is built in the dialogue of concepts such as "construction" and "poetry", "pioneer" and "rear front", "theory" and "practice", "macro" and "precision", "absence" and "presence". With a view to the construction of cultural research scholars have a certain enlightenment.
【学位授予单位】：天津大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：TU20

【参考文献】