关于中英建筑能耗模拟和相关政策的对比研究

发布时间：2018-04-27 14:17

本文选题：能耗政策 + 公共建筑　；参考：《重庆大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：建筑能耗及其碳排放是近年来广受关注的一个话题。超过百分之四十的碳排放与建筑相关,这意味着如果建筑能效更高,那么碳排放就会相应减少。中国和英国都制定了建筑能源消耗和二氧化碳排放的相关管理政策,意图实现建筑能效的提高和减少建筑碳排放量。研究的目的是比较中国和英国之间的相关能源政策以及建筑能源消耗情况,改善围护结构节能措施的经济性及能源政策的建议。研究采用了文献法,实地考察和软件模拟法三种研究方法,用来比较中英能源政策的文件,提出了中英两国在实现节能减排目标上的政策不同点和各自的优势与不足。实地考察可以帮助作者对建筑本身理解更加深刻,包括对建筑领域内人员每天的相关活动变化都有更好的了解。运用中英两国常用的能耗模拟软件DeST和IES模拟软件构建了建筑能耗模型,对不同气候条件、不同节能策略进行了模拟。这样就可以通过模拟得到在不同节能改造策略下的建筑能耗预估结果。从本文的研究结果看,在参数标准上英国的能源政策比中国的更加严格,但是与此同时,中国的能源政策却比英国的更加详细。本文提出了一些对能耗政策制定的建议,对中国建筑来说,升级改造玻璃幕墙是性价比较高的节能措施,而英国建筑通过改造内墙节能是比较划算的节能方式。对于英两国来说,降低冬夏两季的自然通风换气次数是改善建筑能耗和降低二氧化碳排放的最佳方法。本文的结论和建议可用于未来中英两国能源政策的提高和改善。
[Abstract]:Building energy consumption and carbon emissions are a topic of great concern in recent years. More than 40% of carbon emissions are building-related, which means that if buildings are more energy-efficient, they will be reduced accordingly. Both China and the UK have regulatory policies on energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions from buildings aimed at improving building energy efficiency and reducing building carbon emissions. The purpose of the study is to compare the energy policies between China and the United Kingdom and the energy consumption of buildings, and to improve the economy and energy policy of the energy conservation measures of the enclosure structure. This study adopts three research methods: literature method, field investigation and software simulation method, which are used to compare the documents of Sino-British energy policy, and point out the differences of policies and their respective advantages and disadvantages in achieving the goal of energy saving and emission reduction between China and Britain. Field trips can help the author to understand the architecture itself better, including the daily changes in the activities of people in the field of architecture. The building energy consumption model is constructed by using the energy consumption simulation software DeST and IES which are commonly used in China and Britain. Different climate conditions and different energy saving strategies are simulated. In this way, the prediction results of building energy consumption under different energy saving strategies can be obtained by simulation. According to the results of this paper, the energy policy of Britain is more strict than that of China, but at the same time, the energy policy of China is more detailed than that of Britain. This paper puts forward some suggestions on the formulation of energy consumption policy. For Chinese buildings, upgrading and reforming glass curtain walls is a cost-effective energy saving measure, while the British building is a more cost-effective way to save energy by retrofitting the inner walls. For Britain and Britain, reducing the number of natural ventilation exchanges in the winter and summer seasons is the best way to improve building energy consumption and reduce carbon dioxide emissions. The conclusions and suggestions of this paper can be used to improve the energy policies of China and Britain in the future.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：TU111.195

【相似文献】