基于承包商视角的国际工程争议解决方式决策研究

发布时间：2018-04-29 02:10

本文选题：国际工程 + 承包商　；参考：《天津大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：目前,中国工程企业响应“走出去”的号召,逐步增加了对外工程的承包,使得对外承包已经成为“走出去”战略的主要形式。对外承包的增加能够释放国内多余的工程产能,向国外输出劳务、技术、设备,增加相互之间的交流,提高中国的综合实力。但与此同时,国际工程承包商也面临着很多问题。国际工程由于其规模大、建设周期长、参与方多、国际环境复杂等特点,使得中国承包商面临着频繁的争议,学术界也缺少对国际工程承包商在争议解决方式决策上的研究,因此如何在争议解决方式上进行适当的决策成为重要问题。本文首先通过文献分析和专家访谈确定了国际工程争议解决方式和决策时的评价目标,分为3种解决方式和7个评价目标。然后通过对国际工程承包商进行问卷调查获得关于国际工程争议解决方式决策的相关数据,利用多目标模糊决策法建立基于承包商视角的国际工程争议解决方式选择模型。本文根据调查数据,利用已建立的多目标决策模型,分析中国国际工程承包商在争议解决方式上的决策,最终得出争议解决方式的优先次序是协商、争议解决替代方式、仲裁或诉讼,中国国际工程承包商在争议进行到优选的解决方式时尽量与对方达成一致意见,从而更能满足自身的需求。本文建立的争议解决方式决策模型和分析中国国际工程承包商的优选方式为国际工程承包商的决策提供了支持和指导。
[Abstract]:At present, in response to the call of "going out", Chinese engineering enterprises have gradually increased the contracting of foreign projects, making it the main form of "going out" strategy. The increase of foreign contracting can release the redundant engineering capacity in China, export labor, technology and equipment to foreign countries, increase the exchange between each other, and improve China's comprehensive strength. But at the same time, international engineering contractors are also facing a lot of problems. Because of its large scale, long construction period, more participants and complex international environment, Chinese contractors are facing frequent disputes, and the academic circles lack of research on the decision-making of international engineering contractors' dispute resolution. Therefore, how to make appropriate decisions on dispute settlement has become an important issue. In this paper, through literature analysis and expert interviews, the evaluation objectives of international engineering dispute resolution and decision-making are determined, which are divided into three solutions and seven evaluation objectives. Then through the questionnaire survey to the international engineering contractors to obtain the relevant data about the decision of international engineering dispute resolution method, the multi-objective fuzzy decision method is used to establish the model of the international engineering dispute settlement mode selection based on the contractor's perspective. Based on the survey data and using the established multi-objective decision model, this paper analyzes the decision of Chinese international engineering contractors in dispute settlement, and finally concludes that the priority of dispute resolution is negotiation and alternative dispute resolution. Arbitration or litigation, China's international engineering contractor in the dispute on the preferred way to reach agreement with the other party, so as to better meet their own needs. In this paper, the decision model of dispute resolution and the analysis of the optimal selection of Chinese international engineering contractors provide support and guidance for the decision-making of international engineering contractors.
【学位授予单位】：天津大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：F426.92

【参考文献】