苏州传统村落分类保护研究
发布时间:2018-06-18 04:10
本文选题:传统村落 + 分类 ; 参考:《苏州科技学院》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:伴随着城镇化和城乡一体化的迅猛推进,传统村落正在以惊人的速度消失,如何更为科学高效地对其开展保护,极为重要且紧迫。传统村落由于在格局、规模、风貌的保存现状往往不及古村落,受到的重视程度也远远不如古村落,对其开展保护的研究也相对较少。本文认为,传统村落具有经济、社会、文化、生态等方面的价值,不仅应得到严格保护,而且应依据价值的不同维度,开展分类保护、分层次管理和多元化利用。 苏州的传统村落数量多、分布广,承载着大量的历史信息,有着深厚的文化底蕴,具有重要价值;但由于生产方式、社会环境的变迁,政策层面的影响,,认识上、技术上的缺失,这些村落一方面传统的格局风貌已经发生了很大的改变,另一方面萧条破败、与现代生活不相适应,沦落为“被遗忘的角落”,甚至已大量拆并消失。本文立足于历时3个月对苏州大量传统村落开展的深入调研基础之上,通过对传统村落总体特征和价值维度的全面分析,构建了苏州传统村落价值评价指标体系和分类模型,依据核心价值将苏州分为传统农耕村落、历史文化村落、田园人居村落和综合型村落四种类型,进而分别探讨了四种类型传统村落在保护过程中的差异化需求,并从保护的方向、内容、方法几个方面探讨了每种类型传统村落的保护模式。论文选取苏州三洋村、直塘社区、开弦弓村、三家市村为典型案例,对四种类型的传统村落进行了实证研究,验证了理论框架及技术方法的可行性和实践价值。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of urbanization and urban-rural integration, traditional villages are disappearing at an alarming speed. How to protect them more scientifically and efficiently is extremely important and urgent. Because of the traditional villages in the pattern, scale, style and features of the preservation of the status quo is often less than the ancient villages, the degree of attention to the ancient villages is far less than the ancient villages, and the research on its protection is relatively less. This paper holds that traditional villages have economic, social, cultural and ecological values, which should not only be strictly protected, but also be protected according to different dimensions of value. The traditional villages in Suzhou have a large number and wide distribution, bearing a large amount of historical information, with profound cultural background, and of great value. However, due to the changes in the production mode, the social environment, the influence of the policy level, and the cognition, Due to the lack of technology, on the one hand, the traditional pattern of these villages has changed greatly, on the other hand, the depression is not in harmony with modern life, and it has been reduced to a "forgotten corner", and has even been demolished and disappeared in large numbers. Based on the in-depth investigation of a large number of traditional villages in Suzhou for three months, this paper constructs the evaluation index system and classification model of Suzhou traditional villages through the comprehensive analysis of the overall characteristics and value dimensions of the traditional villages. According to the core value, Suzhou is divided into four types: the traditional farming village, the historical and cultural village, the pastoral settlement village and the comprehensive village. The protection mode of each kind of traditional village is discussed from the direction, content and method of protection. This paper selects Sanyo Village, Zhitang Community, Kaixian bow Village and Sanjia City Village in Suzhou as typical cases, and makes an empirical study on four kinds of traditional villages, and verifies the feasibility and practical value of the theoretical framework and technical methods.
【学位授予单位】:苏州科技学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:TU982.29
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陆林;葛敬炳;;徽州古村落形成与发展的地理环境研究[J];安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版);2007年03期
2 吴良镛;;文化遗产保护与文化环境创造——为2007年6月9日中国文化遗产日写[J];城市规划;2007年08期
3 阳建强;;江南水乡古村的保护与发展——以常熟古村李市为例[J];城市规划;2009年07期
4 邵甬;付娟娟;;以价值为基础的历史文化村镇综合评价研究[J];城市规划;2012年02期
5 吴承照,肖建莉;古村落可持续发展的文化生态策略——以高迁古村落为例[J];城市规划汇刊;2003年04期
6 阮仪三;袁菲;;江南水乡古镇的保护与合理发展[J];城市规划学刊;2008年05期
7 邵甬;陈悦;姚轶峰;;华东地区历史文化村镇的特征及保护规划研究[J];城市规划学刊;2011年05期
8 张敏;;农业景观理论基础探析[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年02期
9 罗瑜斌;肖大威;;珠江三角洲历史文化村镇的类型及特征研究[J];华中建筑;2009年08期
10 杨眉;陆楣;;浙东历史村落保护性开发规划研究[J];华中建筑;2010年12期
本文编号:2034006
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/chengjian/2034006.html