层次分析法在施工招投标中的应用研究

发布时间：2018-07-14 22:45

【摘要】：工程施工招投标是以施工为对象并存在于招标人和投标人间的交易,其实际上是一种市场竞争。招投标方式在我国实行以来,政府和相关部门高度重视,力求将其完善,并且用法律的手段来规范招投标制度。就招标方而言,招标的目的是希望能有更多选择,通过选择达到自己预期的目标；就投标方而言,投标最主要的目的是获得承包权,为企业盈利。招标方在评标时如何从众多投标人中择优录取?投标方如何从多个项目中选取最适合自身的项目参与投标?这两个关于决策的问题都是值得招投标双方引起高度重视的。要想解决上述两个问题,单一的考虑某一个因素做决策已经是完全错误的,需要从能够影响结果的多方面因素考虑,对多个选择方案作出综合型的评价。层次分析法是综合评价领域具有广泛的心理基础的方法,将其应用到招投标领域,为招标方和投标方做决策具有一定的参考价值。本文首先对层次分析法的基本理论知识与其模型做了详细阐述,分析了层次分析法在使用过程中具有的优缺点,并对在其基础上改善的两种方法(区间层次分析法和模糊层次分析法)的基本原理和步骤做了详细的研究,总结出了各自的优缺点；其次,将我国郭亚军教授提出的G1法与层次分析法相结合,对层次分析法进行新的改进,使得层次分析法的计算更简便；最后,以招标方和投标方两种不同的视角,以智能楼宇项目的评标为实际项目和企业实际面临的项目选择问题作为背景,将基于G1法的层次分析法应用于其中,分别构建了智能楼宇系统评标指标体系和投标方关于投标项目选择指标体系,最终做出决策。
[Abstract]:Engineering construction bidding is a kind of market competition, which is a kind of transaction between the tenderer and the bidder, which takes the construction as the object and exists between the tenderer and the bidder. Since the implementation of the bidding method in our country, the government and relevant departments attach great importance to it, strive to perfect it, and standardize the bidding system by means of law. As far as the tenderer is concerned, the purpose of bidding is to have more choices and to achieve its expected goal by choosing; for the tenderer, the main purpose of bidding is to obtain the right of contract and make profits for the enterprise. How can the tenderer select the best bidder from among the many bidders when evaluating the bid? How does the bidder choose the most suitable project from multiple projects to participate in the bidding? These two issues of decision-making are worthy of great attention by both bidders and bidders. In order to solve the above two problems, it is completely wrong to consider a single factor to make a decision. It is necessary to make a comprehensive evaluation of multiple options from the perspective of multiple factors that can affect the results. The Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a method with extensive psychological basis in the field of comprehensive evaluation. Applying it to the field of bidding has a certain reference value for the bidding parties and bidders to make decisions. In this paper, the basic theoretical knowledge of AHP and its model are described in detail, and the advantages and disadvantages of AHP in the process of application are analyzed. The basic principles and steps of the two improved methods (interval Analytic hierarchy process and Fuzzy Analytic hierarchy process) are studied in detail, and their advantages and disadvantages are summarized. Combining the G1 method proposed by Professor Guo Yajun of our country with the Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is improved to make the calculation of AHP more convenient. Finally, from two different angles of view, the bidding party and the tenderer. Taking the evaluation of intelligent building project as the background of the actual project and the project selection problem faced by the enterprise, the AHP based on G1 method is applied to it. The evaluation index system of intelligent building system and the index system of bidding project selection are constructed, and the final decision is made.
【学位授予单位】：西南交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：TU723.2

【参考文献】