双重委托代理下物流金融服务创新及其激励机制研究
本文选题:物流金融服务创新 切入点:双重委托代理关系 出处:《南开大学》2012年博士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:随着物流金融服务在我国的迅猛发展,越来越多的中小企业通过物流金融运作获得了银行贷款授信而改善了企业的资金链;同时,众多知名的物流企业和银行都因提供物流金融服务找到了新的利润增长点。然而,在物流金融服务发展过程中,由于金融机构、融资企业和物流企业三方参与主体间的信息不对称,使处于信息劣势的金融机构、物流企业面临着很多业务风险,如融资企业造假违约、物流企业监管不力、物流企业与融资企业合谋欺骗等现象均影响着金融机构提供物流金融融资服务的积极性。由于金融机构往往通过制定严格规定,最大限度地将部分风险责任转嫁给物流企业,而对物流企业的报酬激励不够等诸多因素的限制,,一些物流企业参与高级的物流金融服务模式的积极性。换言之,激励机制的不完善制约着物流金融服务创新的发展。 基于上述研究背景,本文以物流金融服务创新模式以及物流金融服务三方参与主体之间的契约关系为研究对象,以委托代理理论和激励机制设计理论为理论基础,综合运用归纳分析和演绎分析、定性分析与定量分析以及案例研究和比较分析等多种研究方法,在双重委托代理下对物流金融服务创新及其激励机制进行研究。具体而言,在对传统物流金融服务的各种模式进行系统归纳和比较分析的基础上,首先识别了不同运作模式下物流金融服务的双重委托代理关系;进而,在对物流金融服务创新的内在动力进行分析的基础上,在营运流程视角下较为系统地研究了物流金融服务创新的主要模式,并在信息不对称下对中国台湾地区物流金融服务创新进行了案例分析;最后,对物流金融服务创新三方参与主体的行为进行了博弈均衡分析,尝试在双重委托代理关系下构建了一套物流金融服务创新的有效激励约束机制,进而提出了完善我国物流金融服务委托代理激励机制的对策建议并进行了研究展望。
[Abstract]:With the logistics financial services in China's rapid development, more and more small and medium-sized enterprises through the logistics financial operation to obtain a bank loan credit and improve the enterprise's capital chain; at the same time, many well-known logistics companies and banks for providing logistics financial services to find new profit growth point. However, in the process of logistics financial services in the development of the financial institutions, financing enterprises and the three party logistics enterprises in the information asymmetry between subjects, the financial institutions in the inferior position of information, logistics enterprises are facing a lot of business risks, such as financing fraud breach, logistics enterprise supervision, actively logistics enterprises and financing enterprises are affected by the phenomenon of conspiracy to defraud financial institutions provide logistics finance service. Because financial institutions often make strict regulations, to maximize the risk responsibility to the logistics enterprise, and There are many factors such as insufficient reward and incentive for logistics enterprises, and some logistics enterprises take part in the initiative of advanced logistics financial service mode. In other words, the imperfection of incentive mechanism restricts the development of logistics financial service innovation.
Based on the above research background, this paper takes the service innovation mode of financial logistics and three party logistics financial service contract relationship between the main body as the research object, using principal agent theory and incentive mechanism design theory as the theoretical basis, the comprehensive use of inductive analysis and deductive analysis, qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis, case study and comparative analysis and other research methods in the dual agency, to conduct a study on the logistics financial services innovation and incentive mechanism. Specifically, the basic system of induction and comparative analysis of the traditional model of logistics in a variety of financial services, the first to identify double principal-agent relationship between logistics financial services in different operation mode; then, on the base of analyzing internal power on the innovation of logistics financial services, in the operation process from the perspective of a more systematic research on the logistics financial services innovation The main mode, case analysis and the innovation of logistics financial services in Taiwan Chinese under asymmetric information; finally, the three party logistics financial services innovation in the main behavior of the game equilibrium analysis, try in the dual principal-agent relationship to construct a set of logistics financial services innovation and effective incentive mechanism, and then put forward the countermeasures and suggestions of perfecting the logistics financial services agency incentive mechanism and the research prospects.
【学位授予单位】:南开大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:F259.2;F832
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 罗建兵;许敏兰;;合谋理论的演进与新发展[J];产业经济研究;2007年03期
2 陈淮;关于物资银行的设想[J];中国工业经济研究;1987年03期
3 董志强;严太华;;监察合谋:惩罚、激励与合谋防范[J];管理工程学报;2007年03期
4 杨文鹏,李金英;国有资本双重委托代理关系的又一解释——一个三人参与的博弈模型及其应用[J];经济师;2002年11期
5 刘莎;;在中国发展供应链金融的探索[J];经济师;2009年03期
6 尹海丹;;基于供应链金融各模式下的银行风险防范[J];经济师;2009年05期
7 唐宗明,蒋位;中国上市公司大股东侵害度实证分析[J];经济研究;2002年04期
8 郑志刚;投资者之间的利益冲突和公司治理机制的整合[J];经济研究;2004年02期
9 冯根福;双重委托代理理论:上市公司治理的另一种分析框架——兼论进一步完善中国上市公司治理的新思路[J];经济研究;2004年12期
10 曾文琦;;关于仓单质押贷款业务现状及其市场资源配置要点的探讨[J];金融经济;2006年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 孙会;[N];金融时报;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 原艳青;银行监管合谋行为的博弈分析[D];东北财经大学;2005年
2 山囡囡;物流金融业务风险研究[D];大连海事大学;2007年
3 熊小芬;物流金融业务模式及风险管理研究[D];武汉理工大学;2007年
本文编号:1592531
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/huobilw/1592531.html