基于共有权益拆分交易模式的文化产权市场发展策略研究
发布时间:2018-05-02 01:44
本文选题:文化产权 + 共有权益 ; 参考:《河南工业大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:文化产权交易是根据证券交易和产权交易共同演化而形成的一种新型交易模式,其本身是多层资本市场的有益补充,能够促进文化产业与金融资本的深入结合。十七届六中全会首次将“文化命题”作为中央全会的议题,极力推动了我国文化产业经济进入发展繁荣的新阶段,在此背景下,国内各地纷纷立项并建设文化产权交易所,由此引发了文化产业融资与交易模式的广泛探讨和实践。 研究遵循“现状分析—理论研究—模型设计—应用分析”的规范过程,首先对文化产权的内涵和交易模式进行理论分析,并总结现阶段文化产权市场发展过程中所存在的典型问题,在此基础上提出共有权益拆分交易模式,并进而分析了该模式的关键因素、交易流程、体系框架和风险防范等具体环节;其次以郑州文化产权交易所作为案例研究对象,应用共有权益拆分交易模式针对郑州文化产权交易所的经营结构和市场策略进行重新构建,并以经济效益和社会效益为指标验证该模式的可行性和有效性,最后从宏观政策和企业自身两个方面分析并提出了基于共有权益拆分交易模式的文化产权市场发展对策。 主要结论为:(1)文化产权交易能够实现文化产业与金融资本的有效对接,而目前以利益驱动机制为核心的份额化交易模式在一定程度上违背了传统经济伦理,放大投机机制并造成流动性泛滥,影响了文化产权交易市场的可持续性发展;(2)基于产权理论的共有权益拆分交易模式能够有效拓展文化产业融资渠道并降低交易风险,促进文化产权交易制度的健全和市场发展的规范,引导文化产权市场良性发展;(3)应用表明,基于产权理论的共有权益拆分交易模式能够强化郑州文化产权交易所的定价权,有效提升企业经营绩效,促进郑州区域性金融中心的建设和发展。
[Abstract]:Cultural property right transaction is a new kind of transaction mode formed by the mutual evolution of securities transaction and property right transaction. It is a beneficial supplement of multi-layer capital market and can promote the deep combination of cultural industry and financial capital. For the first time, the sixth Plenary session of the 17th CPC Central Committee took "cultural proposition" as the topic of the plenary session, which pushed the cultural industry economy into a new stage of development and prosperity. In this context, various parts of the country set up projects and set up cultural property exchanges one after another. This has caused the culture industry financing and the transaction pattern extensive discussion and the practice. The research follows the normative process of "current situation analysis, theoretical research, model design and application analysis". Firstly, the connotation and transaction mode of cultural property rights are analyzed theoretically. On the basis of summarizing the typical problems existing in the process of the development of the cultural property market at present, the paper puts forward the split transaction model of common rights and interests, and then analyzes the key factors and the trading process of the model. Secondly, taking Zhengzhou Cultural property Exchange as the case study object, applying the split transaction mode of common rights and interests to rebuild the management structure and market strategy of Zhengzhou Cultural property Exchange. The feasibility and effectiveness of the model are verified by taking economic and social benefits as indicators. Finally, the development countermeasures of cultural property market based on the split transaction model of common rights and interests are analyzed and put forward from two aspects of macro policy and enterprise itself. The main conclusion is that the cultural property right transaction can realize the effective connection between the cultural industry and the financial capital, but the share trading mode, which is based on the interest driven mechanism, to some extent violates the traditional economic ethics. Magnifying speculation mechanism and causing liquidity flooding, which affect the sustainable development of cultural property rights trading market. (2) the split transaction model based on property right theory can effectively expand financing channels and reduce transaction risk of cultural industry. The application of promoting the perfection of cultural property right transaction system and the standardization of market development and guiding the benign development of cultural property right market shows that the split transaction model of common rights and interests based on property right theory can strengthen the pricing power of Zhengzhou Cultural property right Exchange. Effectively improve business performance, promote the construction and development of Zhengzhou regional financial center.
【学位授予单位】:河南工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:G124;F832.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 潘卫杰;;试论民族文化产权及其保护[J];产权导刊;2007年03期
2 苑德军,任志宏;关于证券公司监管的几个理论问题[J];当代财经;2002年02期
3 颜纯钧;文化产权和文化安全[J];东南学术;2004年S1期
4 高宏存;;经济全球化中的文化产权问题研究[J];福建论坛(人文社会科学版);2010年06期
5 沈勇;全球化时代艺术生态价值的取向[J];广西教育学院学报;2004年01期
6 龙夫;;文化产权交易:撬动文化产业腾飞的杠杆——访上海文化产权交易所负责人张天[J];上海国资;2009年10期
7 尚雨;顾江;;收益外溢、产权失灵与中国文化产业发展[J];现代经济探讨;2007年02期
8 杨新红;产权交易平台的构建与结构调整──从经济体制改革宣传中想到的一些问题[J];经济问题探索;2001年05期
9 常林朝;李源;;河南省知识产权交易市场建设与发展对策研究[J];科技管理研究;2010年07期
10 周洪涛;单晓光;;知识产权文化与知识产权制度关系研究——以知识产权制度的困境为视角[J];科学学研究;2009年01期
,本文编号:1831876
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/huobilw/1831876.html