中国建立区域碳交易市场势在必行

发布时间：2018-05-04 22:17

本文选题：低碳经济 + 政治经济学分析　；参考：《学术月刊》2010年07期

【摘要】：程恩富和王朝科从政治经济学的视角构建了一个低碳经济的理论框架,并为深化低碳经济的理论研究和政策研究提供一种可资借鉴的方法。杨志和陈波对碳排放权的三种产权类型进行分析,认为控制温室气体排放的有效方式是在对排放总量严格控制的前提下,借助特定的制度安排将碳排放权或减排目标分解并落实到每一个微观单位。马艳和李真认为,在发达国家与不发达国家之间的国际贸易交换活动中,除了直接体现在国际商品价值生产方面的不平等交换之外,还存在"碳"的不平等交换,两种经济体在贸易品生产技术和国际碳排放标准的制定权等方面的差异性,是导致国际"碳"不平等交换的重要原因。齐新宇和严金强在马克思的两部类均衡增长模型的基础上,通过建立一个存在环境约束条件的增长模型,来说明为什么技术进步和产业结构的转变能够控制"碳"排放,从而保证可持续的增长。
[Abstract]:Cheng Enfu and Wang Chao-ke constructed a theoretical framework of low-carbon economy from the perspective of political economy, and provided a useful method for deepening the theoretical research and policy research of low-carbon economy. Yang Zhi and Chen Bo analyzed the three types of property rights of carbon emission rights, and concluded that the effective way to control greenhouse gas emissions is to strictly control the total amount of emissions. Carbon emission rights or emission reduction targets are broken down and implemented to each micro unit through specific institutional arrangements. Ma Yan and Li Zhen believe that in the exchange of international trade between developed and underdeveloped countries, in addition to the unequal exchange directly reflected in the production of international commodity value, there is also an unequal exchange of "carbon". The difference between the two economies in the production technology of trade products and the right to set international carbon emission standards is an important reason for the unequal exchange of international carbon. Qi Xinyu and Yan Jinqiang established a growth model with environmental constraints on the basis of Marx's two-part balanced growth model to explain why technological progress and the transformation of industrial structure can control "carbon" emissions. In order to ensure sustainable growth.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学经济学院;
【分类号】：F832.5;F205

【相似文献】