基于多主体仿真的风险投资股权退出拍卖研究
[Abstract]:Venture capital can promote technological innovation and economic development. There are four main ways of venture capital withdrawal: first open issue, merger and acquisition, repurchase and liquidation. The threshold of the gem is high, and the initial public issue is expensive. Because of the widespread existence of information asymmetry, the enterprise merger or acquisition will lead to the risk enterprises. Or the value of the project is underestimated, which makes the real value of the venture capital project can not be effectively revealed, the venture capital is difficult to smooth out, the market efficiency is low; because of the venture capital problem, the repurchase is also difficult; liquidation is only the means to choose when the venture enterprise is bankrupt. It is difficult to realize the maximization of capital value of venture investors. The core of the problem is to reveal the real value of venture enterprises or projects under asymmetric information, and to make the capital realize the maximum value of the venture capital, the venture capital is successfully withdrawn and the capital appreciation of the venture capital is achieved. The purpose of recycling.
Because auction is essentially an effective means and value disclosure mechanism to allocate resources under asymmetric information, auction theory can solve the problem of maximizing the value of goods and optimizing the allocation of resources, and then evade the moral hazard and adverse selection caused by asymmetric information when venture capital exit. In the view of the square, two kinds of mathematical model of the multi attribute auction mechanism of the venture capital equity withdrawal - the unified price auction model and the discriminatory price auction model are established to maximize the equity value of the venture capital. In this paper, we use the multi utility theory and use the multi utility theory to select the bidder in the auction system in two stages. In the first stage, the multi utility theory is used for comprehensive scoring to eliminate some low quality bidder. In the second stage, a single attribute item is auctioned on the most important price attribute, and the risk is put in accordance with the risk. The most important attribute of the equity withdrawal from the auction, the price attribute, divides the auction into a unified price auction and a discriminatory price auction, on the basis of which a corresponding mathematical model is established.
In view of the characteristics of the equity auction of venture capital, such as the intelligent behavior of the bidder, the mutual learning, the information transmission, and the bidding strategy of the bidder, the multi-agent system introduces the auction mechanism to solve the problem of the maximization of the value of the equity auction and the allocation of resources. It is assumed that the main body of the intelligence (Agent) is to buy. The bidder, in the open, dynamic multi-agent system, the self-interest body has its own goals and preferences, through observation, negotiation and reasoning, to determine what kind of bidding behavior strategy. The single subject can not accomplish the goal independently, and need the participation and help of other subjects, that is to say, we need to jointly solve the advantages through multiple main forces. According to the theory of auction theory, when the bidder adopts the strategy of telling the truth, it is the best strategy for the bidder, and the auctioneer is also expected to get the maximum benefit, and the auction system will reach a balance. But in the case of the venture capital stock withdrawal from the associated value auction, the competitor with limited rationality should be excluded. In the case of noise interference, it is difficult to say the truth, so using the learning optimization mechanism of intelligent algorithm can make the bidder achieve the optimal solution with the optimization of the intelligent group, the auction system reaches the equilibrium, which makes the auctioneer with the venture capital stock exit expect the maximum benefit. This paper uses the particle swarm optimization (PSO) to optimize the venture capital stock. The bidding strategy of the bidder is unified by the mathematical model of the price auction, and the genetic algorithm (GA) is used to optimize the bidding strategy of the bidders in the discriminatory price auction model when the risk investment is withdrawn.
The model based on the associated value auction system and the bidding strategy of the bidder can be considered as a dynamic and complex system. The traditional mathematical methods and experimental methods are difficult to solve. In this paper, the method of complex system is used to solve the optimization of the quotation of complex auction system and the maximization of the expectation of the auctioneer. Multi subject modeling and simulation is a very flexible modeling and simulation technology. The essential feature is to establish the conceptual model of the system by multi-agent perspective. In this paper, it is based on the multi-agent perspective to describe the exit auction of risk investment. In the auction bidding process, the bidder is the auction bidding based on the associated value, due to the pre bidding owners. The thought and behavior of the bidders in reality are complex. They have intelligence, adaptability, learning and interactivity. There must be a noise form of information communication channel between the subjects. The subject will get some other people's bidding information so as to maximize their own interests. This complex selection process meets the characteristics of many subjects. Therefore, in this paper, the multi-agent simulation platform Netlogo is used to verify the bidding strategy of each subject, the unified price auction model and the discriminatory price auction model. The main flow of the auction system is the actual system, the conceptual model, the simulation model, the simulation result and the conclusion. Finally, the conclusion is used to verify and verify the results. It is correct and reasonable to modify the venture capital withdrawal auction model.
【学位授予单位】:武汉大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:TP18;F832.51;F724.59
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;上海高洁信息科技股份有限公司[J];产权导刊;2011年10期
2 朱姝;;企业闪电过会暴露人脉寻租前深圳高官涉嫌PE违规[J];IT时代周刊;2011年01期
3 ;[J];;年期
4 ;[J];;年期
5 ;[J];;年期
6 ;[J];;年期
7 ;[J];;年期
8 ;[J];;年期
9 ;[J];;年期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 丁志利;;有限责任公司股权对外转让的法律问题探析[A];第三届西部律师发展论坛论文集[C];2010年
2 陈守东;王实;刘日昊;;股权激励组合模型设计与应用[A];21世纪数量经济学(第5卷)[C];2004年
3 陈刚;;房地产项目转让中股权转让方式的法律风险防控[A];第五届西部律师发展论坛论文集[C];2012年
4 朱永永;;基于会计研究法的上市公司股权分置改革效应研究[A];第三届(2008)中国管理学年会——运作管理分会场论文集[C];2008年
5 徐钧;;股权分置制度变革:基于维纳随机过程理论的分析[A];中国制度经济学年会论文集[C];2006年
6 安灵;;股权分置改革的长期价值效应研究[A];中国会计学会2011学术年会论文集[C];2011年
7 张守文;;股权变易的税法规制[A];城市经济与微区位研究——全国城市经济地理与微区位学术研讨会论文集[C];2004年
8 余芸春;;国有股权受让的对象分析与遴选机制建立[A];东北老工业基地振兴与管理现代化研讨会暨中国企业管理研究会2004年年会论文集[C];2004年
9 孟庆艳;;继受取得股权股东资格之认定[A];当代法学论坛(2008年第3辑)[C];2008年
10 朱峰;曾五一;;第三十九章 上市公司控股权溢价研究[A];21世纪数量经济学(第3卷)[C];2002年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 上海社会科学院 杨涤;非上市公司股权流动需要加强引导与监管[N];国际金融报;2005年
2 周其仁;股权交易万万不能垄断[N];证券时报;2001年
3 本报记者 孙宏;河南股权交易市场成立[N];中国证券报;2006年
4 本报记者 程维;重庆“三板”4年角斗疑为苦肉计?[N];第一财经日报;2006年
5 阮文华;买非上市股权念好"防"字诀[N];上海证券报;2006年
6 记者 余万芳邋见习记者 魏金金;全省首家股权托管中心在绍挂牌[N];绍兴日报;2007年
7 徐伟;警惕“香港永恒股权交易中心”原始股骗局[N];法制日报;2008年
8 耶鲁大学管理学院金融经济学教授,长江商学院访问教授 陈志武;法治发展与股权致富[N];经济观察报;2008年
9 实习记者 张龙;天津股权交易所获批[N];中国企业报;2008年
10 本报记者 李静瑕;股权交易推动资本市场转折[N];中国企业报;2009年
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 董君勇;跨国股权转让法律适用研究[D];复旦大学;2009年
2 孙有强;股权公示制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2005年
3 夏既明;中国银行业国际股权合作问题研究[D];财政部财政科学研究所;2011年
4 黄满池;基于股权分置改革的上市公司并购问题研究[D];湖南大学;2008年
5 钟红波;基于多主体仿真的风险投资股权退出拍卖研究[D];武汉大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 郭筱琦;股权担保行为研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2002年
2 张军锋;中小企业股权激励问题研究[D];上海社会科学院;2009年
3 周康康;论有限责任公司股权的转让[D];湖南大学;2005年
4 刘晓嫘;有限责任公司股权对外转让若干问题研究[D];东北财经大学;2010年
5 王婷;上市公司股权激励要素分析与方案优化研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2012年
6 徐嘉;谢××诉苏××股权转让行使撤销权纠纷案评析[D];湖南大学;2011年
7 康辉;论股权的瑕疵转让[D];扬州大学;2012年
8 陈洁;有限责任公司股权内部转让的法律分析[D];华东政法大学;2013年
9 金晶;中国上市公司股权分置改革研究[D];天津大学;2006年
10 翟发军;我国非上市股份有限公司股权交易法律问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2011年
本文编号:2122970
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/huobilw/2122970.html