海峡两岸工程监理制度比较研究

发布时间：2018-05-18 19:19

本文选题：海峡两岸 + 工程监理制度　；参考：《北京建筑大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着海峡两岸之间的合作与交流越来越紧密,建设工程领域的合作也逐步加深。2013年两岸签署的《海峡两岸服务贸易协议》中规定,大陆企业可以以合资形式在台湾地区从事工程服务。同时大陆地区允许台湾企业以同样的方式在大陆投标工程,而且还允许台湾地区具有相应条件的工程技术人员报考监理工程师考试,并可以在福建省注册执业。基于此背景,本文通过运用比较研究和文献研究的方法对两岸工程监理制度进行比较分析,不仅能为大陆工程监理的改革提供合理建议和措施,而且还可以为未来两岸工程监理领域的合作与交流提供理论基础。首先,阐述了文章的研究背景,回顾和总结目前现有的研究成果,提出文章研究的切入点。梳理和总结海峡两岸工程监理制度的起源和发展,为后续的监理制度内容的比较提供理论基础,同时限定比较范围。其次,通过运用比较研究法对工程监理的法律制度、监理的模式和行业监管模式进行比较分析,得出两岸在工程监理法律制度的构建层面,二者的立法基础相差将近三十年,从而导致二者在法律的完备性方面存在差距。特别是关于监理从业人员的法律体系构建,大陆目前只有住建部层面的管理办法,而反观台湾地区,则有建筑师法、技师法等不同层级的体系。两岸监理模式的不同导致了监理内容、方式、取费标准等都不同。在行业监管方面,台湾地区政府部门和行业协会分工明确,构建了事前、事中、事后全过程的监管体系,大陆地区则着重于事前的监管,事中和事后的监管力量还比较薄弱。最后,在法律制度、监理模式和行业监管模式三个层面的比较分析基础上,总结台湾地区工程监理制度的成熟做法,结合大陆工程监理的特殊性,提出了大陆应该从完善法律法规体系,出台监理工程师管理条例、拓宽工程监理的范围、强化监理执业行为的监管、推行监理服务满意度评价、试行监理工程师执业年度考核制度、鼓励监理企业和人员加入行业协会等方面改进工程监理制度。
[Abstract]:With the closer and closer cooperation and exchanges between the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, cooperation in the field of construction projects has gradually deepened. The "Agreement on Cross-Strait Services Trade" signed by the two sides of the Taiwan Strait in 2013 stipulates that Mainland enterprises may engage in engineering services in Taiwan in the form of joint ventures. At the same time, Taiwan enterprises are allowed to bid for projects in the mainland in the same way, and engineering technicians with corresponding conditions in Taiwan are also allowed to apply for the examination of supervisory engineers, and can register and practise in Fujian Province. Based on this background, this paper makes a comparative analysis of the cross-straits engineering supervision system by means of comparative study and literature study, which can not only provide reasonable suggestions and measures for the reform of engineering supervision in mainland China. It can also provide the theoretical basis for the cooperation and exchange in the field of project supervision. Firstly, the research background of the paper is expounded, and the current research results are reviewed and summarized, and the breakthrough point of the research is put forward. Combing and summing up the origin and development of the engineering supervision system on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, this paper provides a theoretical basis for the comparison of the contents of the subsequent supervision system and limits the scope of comparison at the same time. Secondly, through the comparative analysis of the legal system of engineering supervision, the mode of supervision and the mode of industry supervision, the author draws a conclusion that the legislative basis of the two sides is nearly thirty years different from that of the construction of the legal system of engineering supervision. As a result, there is a gap between the two in the completeness of the law. Especially with regard to the construction of legal system for supervisors, the mainland only has the management methods at the level of residence and construction at present, while in Taiwan, there are systems of different levels such as architect's law and technician's law. The different supervision modes of both sides of the strait lead to different supervision contents, ways and standards. In the aspect of industry supervision, the division of labor between government departments and trade associations in Taiwan is clear, and the supervision system of the whole process of pre-incident, in-process and post-event has been constructed, while in mainland China the supervision is focused on the prior supervision, and the power of supervision in the event and after the event is still relatively weak. Finally, on the basis of comparative analysis of legal system, supervision mode and industry supervision model, this paper summarizes the mature practices of engineering supervision system in Taiwan, and combines the particularity of engineering supervision in mainland China. It is put forward that the mainland should improve the system of laws and regulations, introduce the management regulations of supervision engineers, widen the scope of engineering supervision, strengthen the supervision of supervision practice, and carry out the evaluation of supervision service satisfaction. To try out the annual examination system for supervision engineers and encourage supervision enterprises and personnel to join trade associations to improve engineering supervision system.
【学位授予单位】：北京建筑大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：TU712.2

【参考文献】