中国疾控中心公益性行业科研专项项目执行情况分析

发布时间：2018-09-14 12:37

【摘要】：目的：了解中国疾控中心及其直属各单位作为承担单位的公益性行业科研专项项目的执行情况,通过研究发现项目执行过程中的问题,进行归纳和分析并提出相关的建议。希望能逐步提高我中心承及其直属各单位担的公益性行业科研专项项目总体执行水平和质量。并为今后中心其它科研项目的管理提供参考和依据。方法：通过查阅2007年-2014年之间由我中心及其直属各单位作为承担单位的22个公益性行业科研专项项目任务书、进展报告、中期检查报告和结题报告、中期检查、评估及验收意见等项目相关资料,归纳科研项目立项以后执行全过程中存在的问题。并分别开展对项目参加人员、相关伦理专家、项目主管部门相关人员等的访谈工作。对3个已验收结题项目中的参加人员进行关于项目中涉及医学伦理执行的问卷调查。结果：通过对已结题验收项目执行情况、在研项目执行情况、相关项目中涉及医学伦理执行情况的分析与讨论。研究发现如下：(1)我中心承担的项目协作单位多有各级的疾控中心参加,前期有合作基础并能保证顺畅沟通；(2)已结题项目中,有个别项目投入人员未达到任务书要求,但并未影响项目顺利完成；在研项目中,也有投入人员未达到任务书要求的情况,但与项目的研究内容和所处的研究阶段有关,并未影响项目按进度完成。(3)已结题项目在预算执行方面,总预算均未超支,但有项目存在分项超支情况,与项目参加单位在财务管理上未对科研项目建立明细账直接有关,与当时项目组预算编制不合理有关。在研项目的经费执行率偏低,主要原因是部分协作单位对原预算进行调整,但未获批复；有些项目工作虽已完成,但未完成最后的支付；项目资金的拨付和支出都需要一定周期。(4)已结题项目全部通过的业务验收,产出成果形式多样。但有2个项目的财务验收不是一次通过,导致认定的结余经费需要原渠道收回。在研项目的产出成果还是以论文和培养研究生为主,没有提前完成任务书考核指标情况出现。(5)在项目伦理审查方面,存在对风险的理解有偏差、知情同意书不规范、知情告知不充分等问题。(6)通过问卷调查发现,3个项目组中的参与人员接受科研伦理教育和培训的比例偏低,对于自己参与科研工作的是否涉及伦理的认识并不统一。但却都认为在对人进行调查前需要签订知情同意书。但存在告知不充分的情况。结论：我中心及其直属各单位作为承担单位的22个公益性行业科研专项项目执行情况总体较好,项目基本能按照任务书履约完成,但有个别项目在预算执行和单位伦理审查方面,还存在一定不足。建议项目组在后续的工作中能落实分工合作,建立项目例会制度,加强现场指导和工作督导,完善项目档案管理、重视项目中涉及医学伦理问题,加强对生物样品的管理、发挥财务专家在经费管理中的作用；建议单位科研管理和财务部门强化预算意识、建立科研管理信息系统和单位的科研课题定期检查制度、加强伦理委员会自身制度建设、落实跟踪审查、加强医学伦理培训工作；建议项目主管部门加强验收和结题审查、引入科研项目第三方监理。为今后公益性行业科研专项项目和中心其它科研项目的管理提供参考和依据。
[Abstract]:OBJECTIVE:To understand the implementation status of research projects in public welfare industries undertaken by CDC and its subordinate units,and to summarize and analyze the problems in the implementation process and put forward relevant suggestions. Methods: Through consulting the task books, progress reports, mid-term inspection reports and closing reports of 22 special research projects in public welfare industries undertaken by our center and its affiliated units from 2007 to 2014 Report, mid-term inspection, evaluation and acceptance opinions and other relevant information, summarize the problems existing in the whole process of the implementation of scientific research projects after the establishment of the project. Results: Through the analysis and discussion of the implementation of the completed acceptance project, the implementation of the research project, and the implementation of the related projects involving the implementation of medical ethics. To ensure smooth communication; (2) in the completed project, some project participants did not meet the requirements of the task statement, but did not affect the smooth completion of the project; in the research project, there were also participants did not meet the requirements of the task statement, but related to the research content and the research stage of the project, did not affect the progress of the project. In the aspect of budget execution, the total budget of the final project did not exceed the expenditure, but there were some items of overexpenditure, which was directly related to the project participants'failure to establish detailed accounts for the research projects in financial management, and related to the unreasonable budget preparation of the project team at that time. The original budget has been adjusted but not approved; some projects have been completed, but the final payment has not been completed; the allocation and expenditure of project funds need a certain period. (4) All the completed projects have passed the business acceptance, and the output results are various. But the financial acceptance of two projects is not one time, resulting in the identified balance. Fees need to be recovered from the original channels. The output of research projects is mainly papers and graduate students, and there is no early completion of the task statement assessment indicators. The proportion of participants in the project group receiving ethical education and training in scientific research is low, and there is no uniform understanding of whether they are involved in ethical research. It is suggested that the project team should implement the division of labor and cooperation in the follow-up work, establish the regular meeting system and strengthen the on-site index. To guide and supervise the work, improve the project archives management, attach importance to the medical ethical issues involved in the project, strengthen the management of biological samples, and give full play to the role of financial experts in the fund management; to suggest that the scientific research management and financial departments should strengthen the budget awareness, establish a scientific research management information system and a regular inspection system for scientific research projects of the unit. It is suggested that the competent department of the project should strengthen the acceptance and examination of the questions, and introduce the third party supervision of the scientific research projects.
【学位授予单位】：中国疾病预防控制中心
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：R197.21

【相似文献】