村级公益事业建设一事一议财政奖补政策绩效评价研究
发布时间：2018-10-17 18:59
【摘要】：村级公益事业建设一事一议财政奖补政策是破解我国农村公共产品供给难题的一项重要公共政策,对其政策实施效果的评价是对地方政府在解决民生问题过程中绩效的综合反映,能够为今后该政策实施的进一步改进与优化提供经验参考。本文利用甘肃省2011年村级公益事业建设一事一议财政奖补政策绩效评价调查数据,首先从公共项目绩效评价视角出发构建了一套由组织领导、项目管理、资金管理、制度建设、工作成效5个一级指标以及17个二级指标组成的村级公益事业建设一事一议财政奖补政策绩效评价指标体系,然后运用群组层次分析法(Multi-AHP)确定各评价指标的权重,最后运用政策综合评价公式对该省6个样本县(区)的这一政策绩效进行了评价与排序。并与采用传统方法进行绩效评价结果进行比较分析,以期创新村级公益事业建设一事一议财政奖补政策绩效评价的方法与工具,同时为我国公共政策绩效评价提供新的思路和视角。研究结果表明：村民满意度、宣传培训、工程质量、项目实施和工作机制是评价村级公益事业建设一事一议财政奖补政策绩效的五个最重要的指标。在此基础上,本研究探索性地提出了一事一议财政奖补政策绩效的改进的方向,即要探索包括政府、村集体和农民在内的多元主体“合作生产”(Co-production)模式,激发协同治理效应。政府要完善相关制度设计,健全政策实施的相关配套设施,规范项目管理流程,发挥村民的主体作用；村集体要提高治理能力,规范村级民主议事机制；广大农民要树立自主治理意识,切实参与民主议事程序。通过将基于AHP方法的政策绩效评价结果与采用传统评价方法的绩效评价得分进行对比分析,本研究认为,运用AHP方法对村级公益事业建设一事一议财政奖补政策绩效进行评价具有可行性,有进一步推广完善进而在公共政策绩效评价实践中加以应用的价值。
[Abstract]:A discussion on the Construction of Village Public Welfare Policy is an important public policy to solve the problem of the supply of rural public goods in China. The evaluation of the effect of the policy implementation is a comprehensive reflection of the performance of the local government in the process of solving the problems of people's livelihood and can provide an empirical reference for the further improvement and optimization of the policy implementation in the future. Based on the investigation data of financial award compensation policy performance evaluation in Gansu Province in 2011, this paper constructs a set of organizational leadership, project management, fund management and system construction from the perspective of public project performance evaluation. A discussion on the Construction of Village Public Welfare, composed of 5 First-Class indicators and 17 Secondary Indexes, A discussion on the Evaluation Index system of Fiscal Prize-Replenishment Policy, and then determine the weight of each evaluation index by using the Group Analytic hierarchy process (Multi-AHP). Finally, the policy performance of 6 sample counties (districts) in this province is evaluated and sorted by using the policy comprehensive evaluation formula. And compared with the results of performance evaluation by traditional methods, in order to innovate the construction of village public welfare, a discussion on the financial reward compensation policy performance evaluation methods and tools, At the same time, it provides a new way of thinking and perspective for the performance evaluation of public policy in China. The results show that: villagers' satisfaction, propaganda and training, project quality, project implementation and working mechanism are the five most important indicators to evaluate the performance of financial award and compensation policy in the construction of village public welfare. On this basis, this study puts forward the direction of improving the performance of fiscal award and compensation policy, that is, to explore the multi-agent "cooperative production" (Co-production) model, which includes government, village collective and farmers, to stimulate the effect of synergistic governance. The government should perfect the relevant system design, perfect the relevant supporting facilities of the policy implementation, standardize the project management process, give play to the main role of the villagers, improve the governance ability of the village collective, standardize the democratic deliberative mechanism at the village level; The broad masses of peasants should set up the consciousness of self-governing and participate in the democratic procedure. By comparing the results of policy performance evaluation based on AHP method with the scores of traditional evaluation methods, this study holds that, Using AHP method to evaluate the performance of Public Welfare Construction at Village level it is feasible to evaluate the performance of financial award and supplement policy, which has the value of further popularizing and perfecting it and applying it in the practice of public policy performance evaluation.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D422.6
本文编号：2277651
[Abstract]:A discussion on the Construction of Village Public Welfare Policy is an important public policy to solve the problem of the supply of rural public goods in China. The evaluation of the effect of the policy implementation is a comprehensive reflection of the performance of the local government in the process of solving the problems of people's livelihood and can provide an empirical reference for the further improvement and optimization of the policy implementation in the future. Based on the investigation data of financial award compensation policy performance evaluation in Gansu Province in 2011, this paper constructs a set of organizational leadership, project management, fund management and system construction from the perspective of public project performance evaluation. A discussion on the Construction of Village Public Welfare, composed of 5 First-Class indicators and 17 Secondary Indexes, A discussion on the Evaluation Index system of Fiscal Prize-Replenishment Policy, and then determine the weight of each evaluation index by using the Group Analytic hierarchy process (Multi-AHP). Finally, the policy performance of 6 sample counties (districts) in this province is evaluated and sorted by using the policy comprehensive evaluation formula. And compared with the results of performance evaluation by traditional methods, in order to innovate the construction of village public welfare, a discussion on the financial reward compensation policy performance evaluation methods and tools, At the same time, it provides a new way of thinking and perspective for the performance evaluation of public policy in China. The results show that: villagers' satisfaction, propaganda and training, project quality, project implementation and working mechanism are the five most important indicators to evaluate the performance of financial award and compensation policy in the construction of village public welfare. On this basis, this study puts forward the direction of improving the performance of fiscal award and compensation policy, that is, to explore the multi-agent "cooperative production" (Co-production) model, which includes government, village collective and farmers, to stimulate the effect of synergistic governance. The government should perfect the relevant system design, perfect the relevant supporting facilities of the policy implementation, standardize the project management process, give play to the main role of the villagers, improve the governance ability of the village collective, standardize the democratic deliberative mechanism at the village level; The broad masses of peasants should set up the consciousness of self-governing and participate in the democratic procedure. By comparing the results of policy performance evaluation based on AHP method with the scores of traditional evaluation methods, this study holds that, Using AHP method to evaluate the performance of Public Welfare Construction at Village level it is feasible to evaluate the performance of financial award and supplement policy, which has the value of further popularizing and perfecting it and applying it in the practice of public policy performance evaluation.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D422.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 田志强;;公共财政如何支持新农村建设[J];决策与信息(财经观察);2006年06期
，本文编号：2277651
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/xiangmuguanli/2277651.html
