程廷祚《骚赋论》研究

发布时间：2018-01-03 14:20

本文关键词：程廷祚《骚赋论》研究　出处：《湖北民族学院》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：清代赋论是自汉代以来两千余年古代赋论发展史上成果最为显著的繁荣时期,是古代赋论的集大成者。这一时期涌现出了一大批前所未有的赋话著作和具有时代特色的论赋专文,这些论赋文著不仅汇聚了自汉代以来所有的赋论遗产,而且反映了赋论家们自己的研究成果和赋论思想,构成了具有总结性和系统性的赋论成果,是中国古代赋论的发展趋势所在。赋话著作如《历代赋话》《雨村赋话》等,论赋专文如程廷祚的《骚赋论》、汤聘的《律赋衡裁余论》等。而《骚赋论》作为古体派赋论的代表作之一,是清代出现较早的一篇具有较强理论性的赋体专论,具有不可忽视的研究价值。本论文第一章对程廷祚和《骚赋论》的相关的情况作简要介绍,并对《骚赋论》进行了版本考订。第二章主要是对《骚赋论》上篇中论赋体起源及诗骚赋的异同的观念进行梳理和认知。在上篇中,程廷祚明确提出了赋“始乎宋玉”,认为“诗为骚、赋之大原”,对班固“赋者古诗之流”的说法提出了质疑。他的观点肯定了宋玉在赋史上的地位,对历来骚赋混淆不清的情况进行了澄清。第三章着重对《骚赋论》中篇中的赋史思想进行总结和评判。他比较正确地论述了汉魏六朝赋的发展演变,但对唐代律赋进行了全盘否定,继续重申“唐以后无赋”,是赋论发展道路上的倒退。第四章对《骚赋论》下篇中的赋论思想进行总结和辨析。在下篇中,他对赋家追求唯美欲丽、忽略讽谏之意的创作风格表示不满,同时调整扬雄的“丽则”观,认为创作应该“先理后词,取则戒淫”,他企图重建“丽则兼备”的文学品格,可以说是从理论上解决了“丽”“则”的矛盾,值得肯定。但这种折衷权衡的原则虽符合赋体创作,却缺乏新意。第五章客观评价《骚赋论》在清代及当今赋学领域的价值和影响。价值主要体现在提高了汉大赋的文学史地位,为后人学习提供了依据和借鉴,树立“丽泽兼备”的文学典范等方面;同时它代表了古赋派理论思想,对丰富清代赋论成果,促进了古代赋论繁荣起着积极影响。
[Abstract]:The Fu theory of Qing Dynasty is the most remarkable prosperous period in the history of ancient Fu theory since the Han Dynasty more than 2,000 years. This period saw the emergence of a large number of unprecedented writings on Fu and special articles with characteristics of the times, which not only collected all the legacies of Fu theory since the Han Dynasty. Moreover, it reflects the research results and thoughts of Fu theorists themselves, and constitutes a summative and systematic achievement of Fu theory. It is the development trend of the ancient Chinese Fu theory. Fu works such as Fu dialect of the past dynasties > Fu dialect of Yucun, etc., such as Cheng Tingzuo's "Sao Fu Theory". As one of the masterpieces of the Fu theory of the ancient style, it is a relatively early theory of Fu monograph that appeared in the Qing Dynasty. The first chapter gives a brief introduction to Cheng Tingzuo and Sao Fu. The second chapter is mainly about the concept of the origin of Fu and the similarities and differences of poetic Sao Fu in the first chapter. In the first chapter. Cheng Tingzuo clearly put forward that Fu "began with Song Yu", thought that "poem is Sao, Fu is the big Yuan", raised the question to Bangu "Fu ancient poem stream", his viewpoint affirmed Song Yu's position in the Fu history. The third chapter focuses on summing up and judging the thought of Fu history in the part of "Sao Fu Theory". He correctly discusses the development and evolution of Fu in Han, Wei and six dynasties. However, it is a retrogression on the development of Fu theory. Chapter 4th summarizes and discriminates the thought of Fu theory in the second part of "Sao Fu Theory", and continues to reiterate that "there is no Fu after Tang Dynasty". He expressed dissatisfaction with the Fu family's artistic style of pursuing beauty and neglecting the irony of remonstrance. At the same time, he adjusted Yang Xiong's "Lize" view, and thought that creation should be "to reason before words, and to take them out of prostitution." His attempt to reconstruct the literary character of "both Li and Li" can be said to have solved the contradiction of "Li" in theory, which is worthy of recognition. Chapter 5th objectively evaluates the value and influence of "Sao Fu" in Qing Dynasty and in the field of Fu study. The value is mainly reflected in improving the status of literature history of Han Da Fu, which provides the basis and reference for future generations to learn. Setting up the literary model of "both Lize" and so on; At the same time, it represents the theory of ancient Fu school, which has a positive effect on enriching the achievements of Fu theory in Qing Dynasty and promoting the prosperity of ancient Fu theory.
【学位授予单位】：湖北民族学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I207.22

【参考文献】