王平陵在抗战时期的文学活动研究

发布时间：2018-01-14 17:03

本文关键词：王平陵在抗战时期的文学活动研究　出处：《西南大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：刚刚过去的2015年是彰显中国抗日战争的伟大意义极其重要的一年,不管是对于中国的抗日战争研究,还是抗战文学的研究都是具有决定性的年份,这年底,习近平总书记和马英九在新加坡举行会谈,两岸关系迈出了关键的一步,都意识到“同中国人民抗日战争的历史地位和历史意义相比,同这场战争对中华民族和世界的影响相比,我们的抗战研究还远远不够,要继续进行深入系统的研究。”就携手共写中国抗战史,共同弘扬抗战精神,共同捍卫民族尊严和荣誉达成了共识。从来还没有哪一个历史阶段的研究受到党和国家的如此重视。在抗战胜利70周年的系列活动中,大陆不仅确立了抗战胜利纪念日,还举行了盛大的阅兵式,“铭记历史,缅怀先烈,珍爱和平,开创未来”在社会各领域引起了强烈共鸣。同这些如火如荼的庆祝历史活动比起来,不管是在台湾或大陆,抗战文学的关注度始终没有得到足够的重视。而且正是因为从战时到战后,两岸都将文学与社会层面的政治斗争捆绑在一起,文学的政治意义被有意的夸大,而审美价值被各个时期的批评家所诟病。这当然与两岸的抗战史研究有莫大关系,两岸的抗日战争史研究因从一开始就与政治紧密相连,而显得极度复杂和敏感,学术化的过程也就更为艰难缓慢。连同长期忽略国民党军队在正面战场的贡献一样,有着当局背景的文人在抗战文学中的贡献也被一并抛弃。通过对王平陵抗战时期在文学创作实践、文学活动的组织等方面的研究,一方面是将王平陵从长期的政治斗争漩涡中解脱出来,回到真正的文学轨道上,在民国的历史语境下探讨其多元性与复杂性;另一方面,更希望以此为切入点,重新思考抗战文学的表达方式和阐释角度,从而丰富抗战文学的版图。全文共分为引言、正文、结语三个部分:引言主要包括了两方面的内容,一是清理本选题的相关研究现状;二是说明本论文的研究思路和价值。第一章主要介绍了王平陵在抗战时期的文学实践,创作时间由1931年起至抗战胜利为止。将其创作文类分为小说、散文,杂感时评、戏剧,电影三个部分进行阐述。内容既涉及军民积极的反抗,也包括汉奸的消极应付;既描写了战争的残酷和毁灭力,同时也对战时的文艺、学术与教育表达了深切的关注,对政府有着殷殷期盼。以此表明在国难当头的前提下,人同此心,国民党当局在抗战文学中并不是毫无作为。第二章主要论述了“卢沟桥事变”爆发后,王平陵在抗战文学活动的组织和宣传贡献,包括组织“卢沟桥公演”和筹备“中华全国戏剧界抗敌协会”(以下简称“剧协”)、“中华全国文艺界抗敌协会”(以下简称“文协”),将《文艺月刊》改版为《战时特刊》,积极配合抗战宣传等,以及在此之前在人事上所作的准备,既通过相似的文艺理念吸引了梁实秋、方玮德、沈从文、老舍等人,还通过副刊的改版和编辑,得到了“左翼”、“新月社”、“京派”等多数文艺界人士的支持和配合,又通过积极筹备“南国社”、“中国戏剧协会”的戏剧公演,与田汉、洪深、欧阳予倩等戏剧人士建立了深厚友谊,以及通过在国民党中宣部任职的关系,与张道藩、方治、徐悲鸿、冯玉祥等人有着长期的往来,都为后来王平陵在一系列抗战活动中的表现,铺平了道路,积累了人脉。第三章主要探讨了王平陵在两岸文学史中被忽略的缘由,在大陆遭到历史的摒弃,主要是一直以来单一化意识形态评判所致,缺乏实事求是的精神与勇气。在台湾没有得到学界的承认,与国民党政府迁到台湾后,对大陆时期的整体反思紧密相关,文艺界的整顿首当其冲。结语部分主要是总结全文,王平陵在抗战时期的文学成就被忽略不是个别现象,对其价值进行重新的阐述和挖掘,并不仅仅是为了寻找历史的遗珠,为其正名;更重要的是,通过对其人生履历和参与抗战活动的考察,希望建立起一个全面、实事求是的历史人物评判标准,在民国历史语境下,丰富抗战文学的版图,找寻抗战文学新的阐释角度和表达方式。
[Abstract]:Just past 2015 is the highlight of the great significance of the Anti Japanese War Chinese extremely important year, whether it is the Anti Japanese war on the Chinese, or the study of war literature is the decisive year, by the end of the year, the general secretary Xi Jinping and Ma Ying-Jeou held talks in Singapore, cross-strait relations is a key step, realize "with the Chinese people's Anti Japanese War historical status and historical significance, compared with the war of the Chinese nation and the world, the war is still far from enough of our research, to continue to study in-depth system." to write the history of the war Chinese, work together to carry forward the spirit of war, to defend the national dignity and honor a there has never been a consensus. On which a phase of history by the party and state so seriously. A series of activities in the victory of the Anti Japanese war in 70th anniversary, not only established The victory of the war memorial day, also held a grand parade, "remember the history, cherish the memory of the martyrs, cherish peace and create the future" resonates strongly in all areas of society. With these activities than like a raging fire to celebrate history, whether in Taiwan or mainland China, anti Japanese War Literature attention has not been given sufficient attention. And it is because from war to war, both sides of the literary and social aspects of the political struggle together, the political significance of deliberate exaggeration of literature, and aesthetic value of each period was criticized by critics. It has a great relationship with the study of the history of the war on both sides of the Anti Japanese War History Research on both sides by from the outset, and politics are closely linked, which is extremely complex and sensitive, the academic process becomes more difficult and slow. The Kuomintang army ignored for a long time in front of the battlefield as a contribution. The scholars in the background contribution in the Anti Japanese War literature are also abandoned. By Wang Pingling during the Anti Japanese war in the practice of literary creation, literature research activities of the organization, on the one hand is to free Wang Pingling from a long political struggle in the vortex, back to the real literature on the track, in the context of the history of the Republic of China the diversity and complexity; on the other hand, more hope as a starting point, to rethink the way of expression and interpretation of the Anti Japanese War literature, so as to enrich the literature layout. The paper is divided into preface, text, conclusion of three parts: the introduction mainly includes two aspects, one is to clean up the related research status the topic; the two is to illustrate the research mentality and value. The first chapter mainly introduces Wang Pingling in the literary practice in the period of Anti Japanese War, the creation time from 1931 to the victory of the war for its creation. The class is divided into novels, prose essays, commentary, drama, the three part of the film in this paper. The main contents are as follows: military resistance positive, including the traitors to cope with the negative; not only describes the cruelty of war and destruction, but also on the wartime literature, academic research and education expressed deep concern, with earnest look forward to the government. This shows that in the premise, rentongcixin, as the Kuomintang authorities in the Anti Japanese War literature is not without. The second chapter mainly discusses the "Lugou Bridge incident" after the outbreak, Wang Ping Ling in the literary activities in the Anti Japanese War organization and propaganda contribution, including the organization of "Lugou Bridge Premiere" and preparations for the "Chinese National Theater Japanese Association" (hereinafter referred to as the "association"), "Chinese National Arts Association (hereinafter referred to as the" enemy "and"), the "Literature Monthly revision of < > > the wartime special, actively cooperate with the Anti Japanese propaganda, and Before in the personnel preparation, not only by the similar literary concept attracted Liang Shiqiu, Fang Weide, Shen Congwen, Lao She also edited by et al., revision and supplement, the "left wing", "new moon", "Beijing school" and other literary and art circles of support and cooperation, and actively preparing for the the "Southern Society", "Chinese drama society" theatrical performances, with Tian Han, Ouyang Yuqian, Hong Shen, drama people established a profound friendship, and the relationship with the Central Propaganda Department, serving in the KMT Party rule, Zhang Daofan, Xu Beihong, Feng Yuxiang and others have a long history of exchanges, for the later Wang Pingling in a series of activities in the Anti Japanese War the performance, paving the way for accumulated contacts. The third chapter mainly discusses the reason why Wang Pingling was ignored in the history of literature in the history of the Strait, was abandoned in the mainland, mainly has a single ideology rating Due to the lack of judgment, spirit and courage of seeking truth from facts. Recognized by academic circles is not in Taiwan, and the Kuomintang government moved to Taiwan, closely related to the overall reflection, the rectification period, the literary and art circles. The last chapter is the conclusion, Wang Pingling was ignored is not an individual phenomenon in the period of Anti Japanese War literature achievement, the the value of re elaboration and mining, and not just to find the history of pearl, as its name; more importantly, based on his life experience and participate in the activities of the study, hope to establish a comprehensive evaluation standard of historical figures in the Republic of China and the historical context, the rich literature layout looking for, explaining the new literature and the way of expression.

【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I206.6

【参考文献】