清代杜诗未刊评点与相关诗话著作关系考

发布时间：2018-02-16 04:40

  本文关键词： 杜诗 评点 诗话　出处：《文献》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：评点和诗话作为中国传统文学批评中特殊的批评形式,在创体时间、形式体制和批评方法上具有较大的相似性,这是二者可相互借鉴的客观基础。清代杜诗未刊评点家往往身兼批点者和诗话作者的双重身份,这是二者多互为采撷的主体因素。清代杜诗未刊评点与相关诗话著作的密切关系具体表现在:杜诗未刊评点是某些诗话著作或笔记类著作的直接来源;诗话的繁盛为杜诗未刊评点综合评本的形成提供了资料来源。当然,清代杜诗未刊评点所引诗话与相关诗话著作亦存在或增删、或补充、或辨正的相异之处,这些转录过程中的差异或变动侧面凸显出不同诗学研究者诗学理念、取舍标准、关注重心等层面的差异。探讨杜诗未刊评点与相关诗话著作的关系,可管窥清代杜诗评点及杜甫诗话发展演变的冰山一角。
[Abstract]:As a special form of criticism in Chinese traditional literary criticism, comments and poems have great similarities in creation time, formal system and critical methods. This is the objective basis on which the two can learn from each other. This is the main factor of collecting each other. The close relationship between the comments of du poetry in Qing Dynasty and the related works of poetry is as follows: the evaluation of du poetry is the direct source of some works of poems and notes; The prosperity of poetry provides a source of information for the formation of comprehensive evaluation of du Shi's unpublished comments. Of course, there are also some differences between the poems quoted in the unpublished comments of du's poems in the Qing Dynasty and the related works on poetry, whether they are added, deleted, supplemented, or corrected. The differences or variations in the transcription process highlight the differences in poetics concepts, standards of choice and selection, and focus on the focus of attention among different poetics researchers. The relationship between the comments on du Shi's unpublished publications and the relevant works on poetry is discussed. We can see the tip of the iceberg of du's poems in Qing Dynasty and the development of du Fu's poems.
【作者单位】： 湖南师范大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“明清杜诗手批本研究”(16BZW081)阶段性成果
【分类号】：I207.22
，

本文编号：1514681