《风俗通义》言说方式研究

发布时间：2018-03-04 02:18

本文选题：应劭　切入点：《风俗通义》　出处：《西南大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：《风俗通义》又名《风俗通》,是东汉末期汝南人应劭所作,记述了汉代以及汉代以前大量的社会风俗。近代以来,《风俗通义》受到学术界越来越多的关注,但对《风俗通义》的研究多集中在文献学、史学、语言学方面,《风俗通义》的文学研究还较少,从言说方式的角度切入对《风俗通义》进行研究至今还未出现,本文回归文本,探究《风俗通义》引经据典、谨案、对比三种极富特色的言说方式,对这三种言说方式的选择进行探因,揭示这三种言说方式对《风俗通义》文学、思想等方面的影响。全文主要分为四个部分:第一部分为绪论部分,这部分主要是对应劭和《风俗通义》作一简介,指出《风俗通义》研究取得的成就和有待研究之处。第二部分为本文第一章,主要是对“言说方式”这一概念进行界定。这一部分共梳理了1983年至今所有关于“言说方式”概念的使用情况,将其分为蕴含期、起步期、发展期,并结合语言学知识对“言说方式”进行概念的界定,分析了从言说方式角度切入《风俗通义》研究的可行性以及创新性。第三部分为本文的第二章,引经据典是《风俗通义》在言说方式上最大的特点,笔者将这些典籍分为四类,并对《风俗通义》所引典籍进行数量上、思想上的分析,认为《风俗通义》的学术归属当为子部儒家类而非子部杂家类,并对引经据典的言说方式进行探因,揭示引经据典言说方式对《风俗通义》的价值和意义。第四部分为本文第三章,本章首先对“谨案”言说方式进行举例说明,从历时和共时的两个维度对这一言说方式的形成进行探因,并探究“谨案”言说方式对《风俗通义》的价值和意义。第五部分为本文第四章,应劭在《风俗通义》中大量使用了对比的言说方式,本章探究了对比言说方式与“春秋笔法”的关联,认为《风俗通义》在言说目的上继承了“春秋笔法”惩恶扬善的目的,在具体的创作手法上则体现为对“春秋笔法”中“直书其事”和“微婉隐晦”的继承,揭示出对比言说方式的价值和意义。
[Abstract]:It is a venerable work of the Runan people in the end of the Eastern Han Dynasty. It describes a large number of social customs in the Han Dynasty and before the Han Dynasty. Since modern times, it has attracted more and more attention from the academic circles. However, the study of the general meaning of custom is mostly focused on the aspects of philology, historiography and linguistics, and the literature study of "customs and meanings" is still few. So far, there has been no research on the meaning of customs from the perspective of the mode of speech. This paper returns to the text. Probing into the introduction of the Classics and the case, contrasting the three very distinctive ways of saying, exploring the reasons for the choice of these three modes of speech, and revealing that these three modes of speech are of value to the literature. The full text is divided into four parts: the first part is the introduction part, which is mainly a brief introduction to Shao and the Customs. The author points out the achievements of the study and the points to be studied. The second part is divided into the first chapter of this paper. It mainly defines the concept of "mode of speech". This part combs the use of the concept of "mode of speech" since 1983, and divides it into three periods: implication period, initial period and development period. Combined with linguistic knowledge, this paper defines the concept of "mode of speech", and analyzes the feasibility and innovation of the study of "customs and customs" from the perspective of the mode of speech. The third part is the second chapter of this paper. Quoting the classics is the greatest characteristic of the way in which "customs and meanings" are spoken. The author divides these classics into four categories, and makes an analysis of the quantity and thought of the classical books cited in "Customs and regulations". The author thinks that the academic attribution of "customs and customs" should be the sub-Confucian class, not the sub-ministry miscellaneous family category, and explores the reasons for the way of quoting the scriptures. The chapter 4th is the third chapter of this paper. From the diachronic and synchronic dimensions, this paper explores the causes of the formation of this mode of speech, and probes into the value and significance of the mode of speech in the context of "Jisheng" to the General meaning of Custom. Part 5th is the 4th chapter of this article. Ying Shao has used a large number of contrastive ways in "Custom and meaning". This chapter probes into the relation between the way of contrast and the method of "Spring and Autumn brushwork", and holds that the purpose of "Customs and regulations" inherits the purpose of "the method of writing in the Spring and Autumn period" to punish evil and promote the good. On the other hand, it embodies the inheritance of "direct writing" and "slight euphemism and obscurity" in "Spring and Autumn brushwork", revealing the value and significance of the way of contrastive speech.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：I206.2

【参考文献】