梁章钜《退庵论文》的文笔骈散之辨及其意义

发布时间：2018-03-11 00:33

本文选题：梁章钜　切入点：《退庵论文》　出处：《广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：梁章钜《退庵论文》重提六朝"文笔之辨",厘清"文"之内涵,意在提高骈文地位,批驳古文家穷经注史、远离文之本质、贬低骈文的观点。较之阮元尊体骈文、否定古文为"文"的矫枉过正,梁章钜通达折中,主张骈文、古文并重,异途同源,骈散结合,不必独尊正统。他反对"以古文为时文"和"以时文为古文"的两相妨害,强调古文和八股时文的互学才能两相成就,较阮元将八股文视为骈文一脉之观点客观公正。梁章钜称《文选》骈体、散体并选,并非骈文选本,批驳古文家对《文选》的轻视。梁章钜骈散结合的文体观调和了清中叶古文、骈文之争,为古文、骈文创作和理论的发展做出了一定贡献。
[Abstract]:Liang Zhangju's thesis on retreating Um restates the argument of the six dynasties' literary style, clarifies the connotation of "Wen" in order to improve the status of parallel prose, refute the viewpoint that the ancient prose family annotates history, is far away from the essence of literature, and belittles parallel prose. Compared with Ruan Yuan Zun's parallel prose, To deny that ancient prose is an overcorrection of "prose", Liang Zhangju-ju-zhou-just-in-between, and to advocate parallel prose, ancient prose with equal emphasis on the same source of different paths, and the combination of parallel prose and prose, without having to respect the orthodoxy alone. He opposed the two aspects of "taking ancient prose as the present style" and "taking the contemporary style as the ancient prose" as a hindrance. Emphasizing the achievement of mutual learning between ancient prose and stereotyped prose, and comparing Ruan Yuan's view that eight-part prose is regarded as a vein of parallel prose is objective and just. Liang Zhanggu's style view of combining parallel prose and prose reconciled the dispute between ancient prose and parallel prose in the middle of Qing Dynasty, and contributed to the development of ancient prose, parallel prose creation and theory.
【作者单位】：广西师范大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“历代骈文研究文献集成”(15ZDB068) 广西省哲社项目(17FZW001) 广西博士后专项资助(KS392) 桂学研究院项目(201605)“梁章钜《三管英灵集》研究”
【分类号】：I207.22

【相似文献】