吴淇《六朝选诗定论》批评方法研究
发布时间:2018-03-11 03:04
本文选题:《六朝选诗定论》 切入点:批评方法 出处:《江南大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:吴淇《六朝选诗定论》是刊行于清初的一本解说选诗的著作,在理论阐述和批评实践两方面都有值得详加考察的成绩。其中最重要的是“以意逆志”的拓展、细化和具体运用,以及参证方法的提出、构建和具体运用。这两种批评方法的讨论是本文的主要内容。“以意逆志”自孟子提出后,经过后世学者的踵事增华,成为中国批评史最基本的一种批评方法。在吴淇的阐述中,“意”的内涵从汉宋诸儒讲的读者之意改为作者之意,以作者之意推求作者之志是就诗论诗;实现“以意逆志”的关键则在于读者与作者在文本之中的语境融合。吴淇由此完成对“以意逆志”的诠释路径和内涵的拓展。这种拓展在解说选诗中的表现,是提出因、缘、想三种要素,细化诠解的过程,并在批评实践中形成几种具体方法。另外,“以意逆志”与“知人论世”,汉宋诸儒分而论之,并未形成关联。吴淇在批评实践中沟通论人论世与论诗论志,是清代中期以后两个命题实现真正结合的先声。参证方法是吴淇提出的一种新的批评方法,是在文本之间寻求诠解依据和解说办法的一种方法。吴淇相信,在历史和传记资料之外,诗歌传统和相关文本有助于选诗旨意的发现和确定。吴淇建构“三际”的诗统,论述选诗所属的第二际“汉道”,这是参证方法的理论基础;又在选诗解说中,讨论各种类型的文本之间的联系及其含义,这是参证方法的具体而精彩的运用。吴淇提出的参证方法,既可在钟嵘的推源溯流和宋人的点化述作中找到学术渊源,又可在西学的互文理论中发现中西攸同的理论旨趣,是应该得到认同和继承的一种批评方法。
[Abstract]:Wu Qi's conclusion on selected Poems of the six dynasties was published in the early Qing Dynasty. It has both theoretical elaboration and criticism and practice. The most important of these is the expansion, refinement and concrete application of "opposing will with intention". The discussion of these two critical methods is the main content of this paper. In Wu Qi's exposition, the meaning of "Yi" is changed from the reader's meaning of Han and Song Dynasty to that of the author, and the author's will is derived from the author's meaning. The key to the realization of "opposing the will with meaning" lies in the fusion of the context of the reader and the author in the text. Wu Qi has thus completed the expansion of the interpretation path and connotation of "against the will with meaning". The performance of this expansion in the interpretation of the selected poems is due to the reason and the reason. Think of three elements, refine the process of interpretation, and form several concrete methods in the practice of criticism. Wu Qi, in his criticism practice, was the forerunner of the real combination of the two propositions after the middle of the Qing Dynasty. The method of reference and proof was a new criticism method put forward by Wu Qi. Wu Qi believes that, in addition to historical and biographical data, poetic traditions and related texts are helpful in the discovery and determination of the will to select poems. Wu Qi constructs a "three-tier" poetic system. This paper discusses the second "Han Dao" of poetry selection, which is the theoretical basis of reference method, and discusses the connection and meaning of various types of texts in the explanation of poetry selection. This is a concrete and wonderful application of the method of reference and evidence. Wu Qi's method of reference and evidence can not only find academic origins in Zhong Rong's pushing back to the source, but also find the same theoretical purport between China and the West in the theory of intertextuality in western studies. Is a method of criticism that should be recognized and inherited.
【学位授予单位】:江南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I207.22
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 刘阳,周新凤;河南省图书馆馆藏善本清代河南籍作家稀见本诗集提要[J];河南图书馆学刊;1998年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 王冠玉;吴淇《六朝选诗定论》研究[D];华东师范大学;2016年
2 傅宝龙;清初谢灵运诗歌批评研究[D];福建师范大学;2015年
3 钟张丽;论吴淇《六朝选诗定论》“三际”中诗与乐的关系[D];湖南师范大学;2014年
4 刘一,
本文编号:1596272
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/gudaiwenxuelunwen/1596272.html