汉字批评:文论阐释的中国路径

发布时间：2018-03-16 15:29

本文选题：汉字批评　切入点：文论阐释　出处：《江汉论坛》2017年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：无视西方语言与汉语言的根本性差异是导致"强制阐释"的重要原因,故中国文论避免"强制阐释"的途径之一是回归"汉字批评",即在文论阐释中回归汉字思维、汉字意识和汉字本位。"汉字批评"的学理依据有三。其一,中国文论的根在古文字(殷虚卜辞、商周铭刻、周秦籀篆),故文论阐释须追溯字义根柢及字文化渊源,从形、声、义的不同层面诂训语根,诠释语义,演绎语义之原生、衍生、再生及生生不息,辨析本义与他义(如古代梵语与近现代西语)的博弈或格义。其二,汉语的性质是表意,意之所随者缘境而异,高度语境化决定中国文论阐释对文本的高度重视,故须依据文学及文论文本返回语义现场,于敷陈事理与摄举文统的互通中厘清中国文论的理论内涵。其三,汉语生命力强盛以及长寿的秘诀在于常用常新,就中国文论之语用而言,因其通而亘古亘今,因其变而日新其业,故须在会通适变之际重识中国文论的语用生命,揭示其历史意蕴及现代价值。中国文论孳乳于汉字语根、鲜活于语境而通变于语用,文论阐释的中国路径必然创生并通达于追根、问境和致用之际。
[Abstract]:Ignoring the fundamental difference between western and Chinese languages is the important reason leading to compulsory interpretation. Therefore, one of the ways for Chinese literary theory to avoid "compulsory interpretation" is to return to "Chinese character criticism", that is, to return to Chinese character thinking in literary interpretation. There are three theoretical bases for "Chinese character criticism." first, the roots of Chinese literary theory are in ancient Chinese characters (Yin Xiu ci, Shang Zhou inscription, Zhou Zhou Zhuan). Therefore, the interpretation of literary theory must trace back to the root of character meaning and the origin of character culture, form and sound. The different levels of meaning are the root of exegesis, the interpretation of semantics, the interpretation of the original meaning, the derivation, the regeneration and the unceasing existence of the meaning, and the analysis of the game or meaning between the original meaning and the other meaning (such as ancient Sanskrit and modern western language). Second, the nature of Chinese is ideographic. The meaning of meaning varies with the context, and the highly contextualization determines that the interpretation of Chinese literary theory attaches great importance to the text, so it is necessary to return to the semantic scene according to the text of literature and literary theory. The theoretical connotations of Chinese literary theory are clarified in the intercommunication between Chen Shili and Zhu Zhan. Third, the secret of strong vitality and longevity of Chinese lies in the common use and new. In terms of the pragmatics of Chinese literary theory, it is everlasting and everlasting. Because of its change, it is necessary to re-recognize the pragmatic life of Chinese literary theory and reveal its historical implication and modern value. The Chinese path of literary interpretation must be created and understood at the time of seeking roots, asking questions and making use of them.
【作者单位】：武汉大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重大招标项目“中国文化元典关键词研究”(12&ZD153)
【分类号】：H12;I206.2

【参考文献】