论“70后”作家的历史叙事及历史感

发布时间：2018-03-26 18:35

本文选题：“后”作家　切入点：历史叙事　出处：《北京社会科学》2017年12期

【摘要】：当前评论界对"70后"作家批评的一个基本共识是历史感的匮乏,其实"70后"作家的历史感知受制于一个历史与文化上的"流动的缺口",它对"70后"作家的写作形成了一种"表述遏制"。"70后"作家在利用各种方式填补这个缺口。在填补的过程中,"70后"作家自觉地遗忘了当下,他们的文本呈现为"活着的过去"与"死了的现在"的对峙。"70后"作家不是靠着由过去激起的情感进入了历史写作,而是因为当下的困惑进入了历史,而且在这个过程中他们以自身献祭的方式成为了历史的被驱逐者和被吞没者。人们对"70后"作家历史感匮乏的指责主要是受制于既定叙事模式的影响,我们不能盲目地判定"70后"作家是没有历史感的,他们只是喜欢把过去私有化,而不是像前辈一样公共化,他们的历史感会以其他的方式展现出来。
[Abstract]:A basic consensus among critics of the post-70s writers is the lack of a sense of history. In fact, the writer's historical perception is restricted by a "flowing gap" in history and culture, which forms a kind of "expressive containment" to the writing of the "post-70s" writer, who uses various ways to fill the gap. In the process of filling, the writers of the "post-70s" consciously forgot the present, Their text presents a confrontation between "the living past" and "the dead present." the post-70s writers have entered history not by the emotions that the past stirred up, but because of the present confusion. And in the process they became the deportees and engulfs of history by sacrificing themselves. People's criticism of the lack of a sense of history of post-70s writers is dominated by the influence of established narrative patterns. We can't blindly judge that post-70s writers have no sense of history, they just like to privatize the past rather than go public like their predecessors. Their sense of history will be displayed in other ways.
【作者单位】：山东大学文学院;
【分类号】：I206.7

【相似文献】