“制度与文学”研究的成就、困境及出路

发布时间：2018-03-28 08:59

  本文选题：制度与文学　切入点：学术史　出处：《北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：三十余年来,中国古代制度与文学之关系的研究,已取得令人瞩目的成绩,形成具有特色的研究范式,一定程度上改变了当代学术格局,推进了古典文学研究的现代化。其学术渊源,根植于西方文学社会学理论与中国学术传统的贯通融合,是中西文化交汇在学术中的体现。但在其发展过程中也出现不少问题,比如未能对"与"的含义进行充分理解和发掘,过于重视文学外部研究因而不能很好地解决文学内部的审美问题,制度与文学关系史的梳理偏于简单化和直接化,研究中过于依赖数字检索因而造成知识性错误等等。有鉴于此,未来研究不仅要反思中国文学与西方文艺理论之间的适应性问题,更应重新思考制度起源,并由此建构新的研究理论和学术方法,在跨学科研究中尽可能避免知识性错误以及"伪考据""伪学术"等现象。
[Abstract]:Over the past 30 years, the study of the relationship between ancient Chinese institutions and literature has made remarkable achievements, formed a characteristic research paradigm, and to some extent changed the contemporary academic pattern. Promoted the modernization of classical literature research. Its academic origin, rooted in the combination of western literary sociology theory and Chinese academic tradition, is the embodiment of the intersection of Chinese and Western cultures in the academic field. However, there are also many problems in its development. For example, the meaning of "he" has not been fully understood and explored, too much attention has been paid to the external study of literature, so it is not possible to solve the aesthetic problems within literature, and the history of system and literature relations has tended to be simplistic and direct. In view of this, the future research should not only reflect on the adaptability between Chinese literature and western literary theories, but also rethink the origin of the system. Based on this, new research theories and academic methods are constructed to avoid knowledge errors and pseudo-academic phenomena in interdisciplinary research as well as "pseudo-textual research" and "pseudo-academic" and so on.
【作者单位】： 贵州师范大学文学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金项目“唐代书籍活动与文学之关系研究”(项目编号:14XZW014)
【分类号】：I206.2
，

本文编号：1675636