李开先《改定元贤传奇》研究
本文选题:《改定元贤传奇》 + 元刊本 ; 参考:《山西师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文以李开先《改定元贤传奇》为主要研究对象,运用了传统的比较方法,对《改定元贤传奇》与《元刊杂剧三十种》相同剧目及《改定元贤传奇》与《元曲选》相同剧目的异同点进行了分析研究,在比较的基础上,探究《改定元贤传奇》的文献价值与理论价值。全文共分为五个部分论述:第一章:回顾前人对《改定元贤传奇》的研究状况,说明选择本课题的原因,明确研究本课题的意义,并对自己的论文创新处进行了说明。第二章:从总题、题目、正名、折、楔子研究其异同点,首先,分析从《元刊杂剧三十种》到《改定元贤传奇》中相同剧目变化的原因,其次,分析从《改定元贤传奇》到《元曲选》中相同剧目变化的原因。最后,结合这几个相关概念的变迁作出总结。第三章:《改定元贤传奇》与《元刊杂剧三十种》相同剧目比较,主要从内容上进行比对,首先分析它们在曲白较少者、曲白较多者、曲白不同者三方面的不同点,其次,结合相关人物论、情境论、语言论对不同点进行了解释,最后,在此基础上,探究《改定元贤传奇》的文献价值。同时,指出《改定元贤传奇》的不足之处。第四章:《改定元贤传奇》与《元曲选》相同剧目比较,主要从内容上进行对比,首先,分析它们在曲白较少者、曲白较多者、曲白不同者三方面的不同点,其次,结合相关人物论、情境论、语言论对不同点进行了解释,最后,在此基础上,探究《改定元贤传奇》的文献价值。同时,指出《改定元贤传奇》的不足之处。第五章:《改定元贤传奇》中体现的理论思想,在第三章、第四章的基础上,通过不同点,进一步探究《改定元贤传奇》中的戏曲思想理念。通过宾白论(论曲白相生、论通俗、论繁简),曲词论(论词采、论机趣、论用事、论巧体),情节论(奇与真、虚与实),人物论(论典型、三者合一原则、类型与个性、正笔与闲笔),观众论(观众心理定势、观众的心理因素),主题论六方面进行论述,探究《改定元贤传奇》的理论价值。结论:总结全文的观点,指出《改定元贤传奇》在总题、题目、正名、折、楔子五方面的变化,在内容上,《改定元贤传奇》较元刊本剧情更完整,可读性更强,更文雅;《改定元贤传奇》与《元曲选》相比,剧情大体一致,《元曲选》在《改定元贤传奇》的基础上更规范、更严谨。《改定元贤传奇》在宾白方面、曲词方面、情节方面、人物方面、观众方面、主题方面体现出了特有的戏曲思想观点。通过比较,彰显《改定元贤传奇》的文献价值和理论价值。
[Abstract]:In this paper, Lee Kaixian "the Legend of changing the Yuan Dynasty" as the main research object, using the traditional method of comparison,In this paper, the similarities and differences of the same repertoire between the Legend of the modified Yuan Dynasty and the Thirty kinds of Yuan Dynasty Zaju, and the similarities and differences of the same repertoire between the Legend of the modified Yuan Dynasty and the Yuan Opera are analyzed and studied, and on the basis of the comparison, the similarities and differences of the same repertoire are analyzed and studied.Explore the literature value and theoretical value of the Legend of changing the Yuan Dynasty.The full text is divided into five parts: chapter one: review the research situation of the former, explain the reason of choosing this topic, make clear the significance of the research, and explain the innovation of my thesis.Chapter two: from the general title, title, correct name, fold, wedges to study its similarities and differences. First, analyze the reasons for the change of the same plays from "30 kinds of Yuan Dynasty Zaju" to "changing the Legend of the Yuan Dynasty", and then analyze the reasons for the change of the same repertoire in "the Legend of the Yuan Dynasty".This paper analyzes the reasons for the change of the same repertoire from the Legend of modified Yuan Dynasty to Yuan qu.Finally, combined with the changes of these several related concepts to make a summary.Chapter three: the comparison of the same repertoire between "the Legend of the modified Yuan Dynasty" and the "Thirty kinds of Yuan Zaju", mainly compared from the content. First, it analyzes their differences in three aspects: the less the white, the more the white, the more the white, and the second, the difference between the three aspects.Combined with the theories of characters, context and language, the differences are explained. Finally, the paper probes into the literature value of the Legend of changing the Yuan Dynasty.At the same time, points out the deficiency of the Legend of changing the Yuan Dynasty.Chapter four: the comparison of the same repertoire between "the Legend of the modified Yuan Dynasty" and "Yuan qu selected", mainly compares from the content, first, analyzes their differences in three aspects: the less white, the more white, the different white, the second, the more white, the less the white, the more the white, the more the white, the more the white, the more the white, the second, the different ones.Combined with the theories of characters, context and language, the differences are explained. Finally, the paper probes into the literature value of the Legend of changing the Yuan Dynasty.At the same time, points out the deficiency of the Legend of changing the Yuan Dynasty.Chapter five: the theoretical ideas embodied in the Legend of the people of the Yuan Dynasty. On the basis of the third chapter and the fourth chapter, through the different points, we further explore the ideas of the opera in the Legend of the sages of the people of the Yuan Dynasty.Through the theory of objective white (on the birth of qu Bai, on popular, on complexity and simplicity, on the theory of qu ci (on the collection of words, on the interests of the machine, on the use of things, on the skillful body, on the plot (strange and true, on the virtual and the real, on the characters (on the typical, the principle of integration of the three, the type and the individuality),This paper discusses the theoretical value of "changing the Legend of the Yuan Dynasty" from six aspects, that is, the psychology of the audience, the psychological factors of the audience and the theme theory.Conclusion: summing up the views of the full text, it is pointed out that the changes of the total title, title, correct name, fold and wedge of the Legend of the modified Yuan Dynasty are more complete and more readable than that of the Yuan print.Compared with "Yuan qu", the plot of "Yuan qu" is generally the same. < Yuan qu > is more standardized and more rigorous on the basis of "the Legend of changing the Yuan Dynasty". "the Legend of the sage of changing the Yuan Yuan" is in the aspects of object, song, and plot.The characters, the audience and the theme reflect the unique ideas of opera.Through comparison, it shows the literature value and theoretical value of the Legend of changing the Yuan Dynasty.
【学位授予单位】:山西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I207.37
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 邓斯博;;从王子一、陈沂看明代前期曲家的避世情感[J];大连海事大学学报(社会科学版);2014年01期
2 俞为民;;李开先的曲学实践与戏曲理论[J];艺术百家;2014年01期
3 杜海军;;论李开先旧藏与元刊杂剧之关系[J];艺术百家;2014年01期
4 郑劭荣;江肓静;;元杂剧口头编演形态探论——以《元刊杂剧三十种》为中心[J];东疆学刊;2013年03期
5 杜海军;;也论元刊杂剧与李开先的收藏关系——甄炜旎《〈元刊杂剧三十种〉与李开先旧藏之关系》失误辨[J];艺术百家;2013年01期
6 李占鹏;;《元刊杂剧三十种》整理研究综述[J];通化师范学院学报;2012年03期
7 孙书磊;;臧懋循《元曲选》的底本渊源及其文献价值[J];戏剧艺术;2011年06期
8 孙书磊;;元杂剧体制在元明的传播与演进——以《改定元贤传奇》为研究中心[J];戏曲艺术;2011年03期
9 方彦寿;;《元刊杂剧三十种》的刻本性质与刊刻地点另议[J];艺术百家;2011年03期
10 杜海军;;从元刊杂剧看元杂剧艺术未被揭橥的特点[J];艺术百家;2011年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 刘铭;李开先文学研究[D];复旦大学;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 张冠男;李开先诗文与戏曲创作关系研究[D];集美大学;2012年
2 李梅;李开先诗文研究[D];山东师范大学;2011年
3 甄飒飒;李开先诗歌研究[D];山东大学;2011年
4 王博雅;李开先戏曲创作研究[D];兰州大学;2008年
5 王国彬;李开先戏曲研究[D];苏州大学;2006年
6 王卓;文体选择与李开先的文学思想[D];首都师范大学;2005年
,本文编号:1767171
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/gudaiwenxuelunwen/1767171.html