“有深度的主体性”与“声音”的革命——关于“白话文”与“新文学”的对话

发布时间：2018-05-03 20:35

本文选题：主体性 + 言文一致　；参考：《杭州师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：1917年1月,《新青年》2卷5号发表胡适《文学改良刍议》,揭开20世纪中国文学革命的大旗。然而,一百年来,在20世纪中国文学史的研究中,如何梳理"白话文"与"新文学"之间的关系,仍是一个有待深入的问题。基于此,我刊于2016年第5期起特设"纪念白话文运动一百周年"专题讨论,并于2016年10月27日下午组织召开了《"白话文"与"新文学"》的小型讨论会,以"言文合一"与清末语文运动的文化指向、新的语文传播媒介及方式的兴起与现代语文改良运动的发生、"白话文"与"新文学"之间的内部过渡与转折,以及白话文学史观对传统文学、学术史的压抑等问题为核心,展开讨论。现将部分讨论内容整理发表,以飨读者。相关话题,本刊今年将持续推进,敬请读者关注。
[Abstract]:In January 1917, No.2 volume 5 of New Youth published Hu Shi's A discussion on Literary improvement, which opened the banner of Chinese literary revolution in the 20 ~ (th) century. However, in the study of the history of Chinese literature in the 20th century, how to sort out the relationship between "vernacular" and "New Literature" is still a deep problem. Based on this, I launched the fifth issue of the special symposium on "commemorating the centenary of the vernacular language campaign" in 2016 and organized a small seminar on "vernacular" and "New Literature" on the afternoon of 27 October 2016, Based on the cultural direction of "integration of speech and writing" and the Chinese movement in the late Qing Dynasty, the rise of new Chinese communication media and the emergence of the modern Chinese improvement movement, the internal transition and turning point between "vernacular Chinese" and "New Literature". As well as the traditional literature, academic history and other issues as the core of the history of vernacular literature. Part of the discussion will now be organized and published to the reader. Related topics, this magazine will continue to promote this year, please pay attention to readers.
【分类号】：I206.6

【相似文献】