《远山堂剧品》考:基于《名剧汇》视角

发布时间：2018-05-04 15:38

本文选题：远山堂剧品 + 名剧汇　；参考：《戏曲艺术》2017年01期

【摘要】：祁彪佳《远山堂剧品》,黄裳称其为"明剧品",即为品评明人杂剧而作;亦有不同意见,以为此书所评不限于明杂剧,故不能加"明"字。据祁彪佳的信函,祁氏曾用"明剧品"一名;又考祁理孙《奕庆藏书楼书目》中《名剧汇》详目,原是祁彪佳为编纂《远山堂剧品》而汇集的杂剧集,故可论定《远山堂剧品》确是为品评明人杂剧而作;至于《剧品》中掺杂有部分元人杂剧,且有部分明人剧作未予著录,原因是祁氏所见刊本即署为明人或元人所作的缘故。
[Abstract]:Qi Pu Jia Yuan Shan Tang Opera, Huang Chang called it "Ming Opera", that is, for the Ming Dynasty zaju, there are different views that this book is not limited to Ming zaju, so can not add the word "Ming". According to Qi's letter, Qi used the name "Ming Opera works". He also took a look at the "Collection of famous Drama" in Qi Li-sun 's Bibliography of the Yiqing Library. It was originally a collection of zaju operas compiled by Qi Yuan-tang. Therefore, it can be concluded that Yuan Shan Tang Drama is indeed written for the purpose of evaluating Ming people's zaju; as for "Drama", there are some Yuan Dynasty dramas mixed with others, and some Ming people's plays are not recorded, the reason is that Qi's periodical is written for Ming people or Yuan people.
【作者单位】：中山大学中国古文献研究所;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目“明代的杂剧辑刊与戏曲文学发展研究”(批准号:13CZW043)阶段研究成果
【分类号】：I207.3

【相似文献】