宋代《毛颖传》仿作研究
本文选题:韩愈 + 《毛颖传》 ; 参考:《安徽师范大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:韩愈的《毛颖传》是一篇“游戏之文”,也是一篇“千古奇文”。作者兼综史传、寓言、小说等体式,用“以文为戏”的方式,将内心的“不平”鸣之于文。《毛颖传》一问世,后世仿者甚众,在宋代兴起了两次仿作风潮。本文以宋代《毛颖传》仿作为研究对象,力图寻绎《毛颖传》仿作的发展规律,包括仿作的发展历程、所作出的突破、仿作体现的重要意义和艺术缺陷等。正文共有四部分。第一部分论述宋代《毛颖传》仿作的发展历程。从历时性层面对仿作在北宋、南宋两个不同时期发展状况进行探索,从共时性层面对两个时期的仿作特点进行重点论述。北宋是仿作的方兴期,此时期仿作主要有同旨仿作和创意仿作两种类型,以仿作群的形式存在。南宋是仿作的继进期,此时期仿作在艺术上的创造性逊色于北宋,但在反映生活的广度和深度上胜于前代,蕴含时代所特有的“精神气候”。第二部分探讨宋代《毛颖传》仿作的新变。宋代仿作在继承前代传统的同时,也有所创新。具体表现有三点:从外在形式和叙事模式来看,突破了宋前单一化模式,由“一元化”趋向于“多元化”;从抒情方式和创作态度来看,从“发其郁积”转为“怨而不怒”;从仿作中的主客体关系来看,经历了由“物我对应”到“物我分离”的过程。第三部分将宋代《毛颖传》仿作放在宋代文学发展的大背景中进行考察,主要从文学观念和文体观念的角度切入。从文学观念方面来看,宋代仿作实践和继承了“以文为戏”、“以故为新,以俗为雅”、“以议论为文,以才学为文”的文学观念。从文体观念方面来看,实现了对“史传”之体的突破和“文传”之体的深化。第四部分研究宋代《毛颖传》仿作的缺陷和成因。宋代《毛颖传》仿作的缺陷有:一是题材内容的趋同,易致人物家世雷同、人物形象雷同、典故雷同之弊;二是主题意蕴的相似,表现为“不平之鸣”、君子之道等主题的相因;三是叙事结构的规摹,主要是对原作谋篇布局、叙事技巧的因袭。其原因主要与仿作者的客观环境、文学素养、创作态度、模仿的局限等方面有关。
[Abstract]:Han Yu's "Biography of Mao Ying" is an article of Game, and also an essay of Eternal Wonders. The author, the author of the historical biography, the fable, the novel, and so on, uses the style of "taking the text as the play" to sing the inner "injustice" into the text. "Mao Ying Zhuan" came out, and there were many imitations in the later generations, and two imitations arose in the Song Dynasty. This paper takes the imitation of Mao Ying in Song Dynasty as the research object, and tries to find out the law of the development of the imitation, including the development course, the breakthrough, the significance and the artistic defect of the imitation. There are four parts in the text. The first part discusses the development of the imitation of Mao Ying in Song Dynasty. From the diachronic level, this paper explores the development of imitation in the Northern Song Dynasty and the Southern Song Dynasty, and discusses the characteristics of the two periods from the synchronic level. The Northern Song Dynasty was the flourishing period of imitating works. In this period, there were two types of imitative works: the same purpose and the creative ones, which existed in the form of imitation groups. The Southern Song Dynasty was the following period of imitating works, which was inferior to the artistic creativity of the Northern Song Dynasty, but better than that of the previous dynasties in reflecting the breadth and depth of life, which contained the special "spiritual climate" of the times. The second part discusses the new changes in the imitation of Mao Ying in Song Dynasty. While inheriting the tradition of the previous generation, the imitation works of the Song Dynasty were also innovated. There are three specific points: from the external form and narrative mode, break through the single mode before the Song Dynasty, from "monism" to "pluralism", from the lyric way and creative attitude, from "its accumulation" to "resentment but not anger"; From the relationship between subject and object in parody, it has experienced the process from "object I correspondence" to "material I separation". The third part investigates the imitation works of Song Dynasty in the context of the development of literature in Song Dynasty, mainly from the perspective of literary concept and stylistic concept. From the point of view of literary concept, the practice of imitation in Song Dynasty inherited the literary concept of "taking literature as drama", "taking reason as new, taking vulgarity as elegance", "taking discussion as literature, and taking talent and learning as literature". From the aspect of stylistic concept, the breakthrough of the body of Historical Biography and the deepening of the body of Literary Biography have been realized. The fourth part studies the defects and causes of the imitation of Mao Ying in Song Dynasty. The defects of the imitation of Mao Ying in Song Dynasty are as follows: first, the convergence of the contents of the subject matter, it is easy to make the same family background of the characters, the same image of the characters, the same allusion, and the other is the similarity of the meaning of the theme, which is manifested as "the sound of unfairness." The third is the pattern of narrative structure, which mainly follows the layout of original works and narrative techniques. The reasons are mainly related to the objective environment, literary literacy, creative attitude and the limitation of imitation.
【学位授予单位】:安徽师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I206.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张智炳;;新时期以来韩愈《毛颖传》研究述论[J];牡丹江师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年01期
2 娄欣星;;论古代假传的文体特点[J];浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版);2014年01期
3 夏云;;天接云涛连晓雾——韩愈《毛颖传》创作的文学渊源探析[J];信阳师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年05期
4 张振国;;中国古代“假传”文体发展史述论[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
5 景凯旋;;士与俳优:《毛颖传》中的两个传统[J];文学评论丛刊;2012年01期
6 朱迎平;;唐宋传体文流变论略[J];学术研究;2010年05期
7 杨洋;;论韩愈《毛颖传》的仿作及其文学价值[J];思想战线;2009年S2期
8 刘成国;;宋代俳谐文研究[J];文学遗产;2009年05期
9 史素昭;;试论唐代寄托传记的小说化倾向及其成因[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年03期
10 查金萍;;试论宋人对韩愈“以文为戏”的接受[J];中国韵文学刊;2007年01期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 林芳;明前假传研究[D];浙江师范大学;2015年
2 黄小菊;唐宋假传研究[D];华东师范大学;2015年
3 刘佳宁;北宋中期俳谐诗研究[D];吉林大学;2015年
4 孙浩伟;“以文为戏”研究—从历史和比较的维度[D];复旦大学;2012年
5 杜艳红;《聊斋志异》仿作研究[D];浙江师范大学;2007年
,本文编号:1931640
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/gudaiwenxuelunwen/1931640.html