从“源出小雅”谈起——兼论阮籍之于“兴”义的价值

发布时间：2018-05-25 19:55

本文选题：比兴 + 隐秀　；参考：《文学遗产》2017年06期

【摘要】：锺嵘评阮籍"源出小雅"历来有争议,"小雅"诗派也是《诗品》的一个特殊现象。"源出"指诗体,"体"即诗篇整体之艺术形相。阮籍与《小雅》诗人同具观察者、思索者气质,其咏怀诗的情感形相和情感逻辑,近《小雅》而远《离骚》。阮诗风格可用深、旷概括,而锺嵘对阮籍的评论与对"兴"的表述极为相似。刘勰的"比显兴隐",又揭示出兴与隐的某种联系。兴、隐、深三个范畴彼此关联各有侧重。最具意味的是,阮籍将兴、隐发挥到某种极致——思想者气质与"兴"相互作用、形成合力,造就了诗歌世界中最有效的哲学表达。
[Abstract]:Zhong Rong commented on Ruan Ji's "the origin of the little elegance" has always been controversial, "small elegance" poetic school is also a special phenomenon of "poetry". The source "refers to the poetic style," the body "is the artistic form of the poem as a whole." Ruan Ji shares the observer and thinker temperament with the poet, and the emotional form and logic of his poems are close to Xiao Ya and far away from Li Sao. The style of Ruan poetry can be deep and broad, but Zhong Rong's comments on Ruan Ji are very similar to the description of Xing. Liu Xie's comparison between exuberance and concealment reveals a certain connection between Xing and hidden. Three categories, Xing, hidden and deep, are related to each other. The most significant thing is that Ruan Ji will Xing, hidden to a certain extreme-thinker temperament and "Xing" interaction, forming a joint force, the creation of the most effective philosophical expression in the poetry world.
【作者单位】：福建师范大学文学院;
【分类号】：I207.22

【相似文献】