新时期文学颁奖词与文学批评的价值导向

发布时间：2018-07-03 21:46

本文选题：文学颁奖词 + 文学批评　；参考：《山东理工大学》2016年硕士论文

【摘要】：文学评奖活动是一种文学批评活动,其核心任务是对文学作品做出价值评判。高层次的文学评奖活动以其专业性、规范性、集体性与权威性对文学创作与文学批评的发展起着重要的推动作用。文学颁奖词作为文学评奖活动最终做出的书面结论,其文学批评文本的属性是毋庸置疑的。文学颁奖词集中体现了评委会对获奖作品的价值评判,不仅在较大程度上影响着不同时期文学创作的价值取向,对文学创作产生着重要的价值导向作用,而且作为文学批评的一种特殊文本也体现出文学批评自身的价值取向,对文学批评的价值选择同样具有引导意义。进入新时期之后,我国出现种类繁多、形式多样的文学奖项,有全国性的奖项,也有区域性的奖项,有综合类的奖项,也有针对不同文体的奖项,对中国当代文学创作与批评的发展有着程度不一的影响。随着社会历史语境的不断变化,文学颁奖词呈现出阶段性特征,其价值评判在不同的阶段有着不同的侧重点,构成了新时期以来文学与文学批评在价值追求上发展演变的大致轨迹。从整体来看,颁奖词对文学的价值评判主要分为社会历史价值评判、审美价值评判、人性价值评判和文化价值评判等多个方面,其中,社会历史价值评判主要体现在对作品中社会历史现象所做出的价值评判、对创作主体社会历史价值观的评判;审美价值评判主要体现在对作者审美价值观的评判、对作品审美特色的价值评判以及对作品审美功能的评判;人性价值评判主要体现在对文学描写人性的肯定以及对作品展现的人性观的评判;文化价值评判体现在充分肯定作品对民族文化特色的呈现、高度赞扬作品对古典文化的传承以及对传统美德的弘扬。这些价值评判并非完美无缺,而是有得有失,其优点主要体现为多元并举,兼收并蓄;坚持弘扬主流价值观;立足当下,与时俱进;其缺陷则主要体现在以多元性代替先进性、价值评判失之偏颇、以阐释代替评判等方面。颁奖词反映了文学批评文本的一般规律与特征,并对文学创作与文学批评产生了一定的价值导向效应,对当代文学价值观念的发展以及文学创作与文学批评的价值取向都产生了一定的引导作用。其中既有正确的引导,也存在价值误导现象。颁奖词作为一种重要的文学批评文本,与文学批评是一种同构同建的关系。一方面,文学颁奖词的发展与完善必须建立在文学批评整体发展与完善的前提之下,必须健全文学批评价值体系、促进文学批评价值导向功能的整体优化;另一方面,颁奖词价值导向功能的优化又会促进整个文学批评价值导向功能的健全,因此,必须高度重视颁奖词的独特作用,树立正确的评奖理念,提高批评主体的整体素质,健全评奖机制,完善评奖标准,最终达到二者互促共建的目的。
[Abstract]:Literary evaluation is a kind of literary criticism, whose core task is to make value judgment on literary works. The high-level literary awards play an important role in the development of literary creation and literary criticism with their professionalism, standardization, collectivity and authority. As the final conclusion of literary awards, the nature of literary criticism is beyond doubt. The literary award speech embodies the value judgment of the award winning works by the jury, which not only influences the value orientation of literary creation in different periods, but also plays an important role in the value orientation of literary creation. Moreover, as a special text of literary criticism, it also reflects the value orientation of literary criticism itself, and also has guiding significance to the value choice of literary criticism. After entering the new era, there are a wide variety of literary awards in various forms in our country. There are national awards, regional awards, comprehensive awards, and awards for different styles. It has different influence on the development of Chinese contemporary literature creation and criticism. With the continuous change of social and historical context, literary awards words show stage characteristics, and their value evaluation has different emphases at different stages. It constitutes the development and evolution of literature and literary criticism in the pursuit of value since the new period. On the whole, the evaluation of the literature value of the awarding words is mainly divided into social and historical value evaluation, aesthetic value evaluation, human nature value evaluation and cultural value evaluation and so on. The evaluation of social and historical value is mainly reflected in the evaluation of the social and historical phenomena in the works, the evaluation of the social and historical values of the creative subject, the evaluation of the aesthetic value of the author, and the evaluation of the author's aesthetic value. The evaluation of the value of the aesthetic features of the works and the aesthetic function of the works, the evaluation of the value of human nature is mainly reflected in the affirmation of the human nature described in literature and the evaluation of the view of human nature displayed in the works. The evaluation of cultural value is embodied in the full affirmation of the presentation of the national cultural characteristics in the works, the high praise for the inheritance of the classical culture and the promotion of the traditional virtues in the works. These value judgments are not perfect, but have gains and losses. The advantages of these judgments are mainly reflected in the combination of diversity and assimilation; upholding the mainstream values; standing at the moment and keeping pace with the times; and its shortcomings are mainly reflected in the substitution of diversity for advanced nature. The evaluation of value is biased and the interpretation is used to replace the judgment. The award words reflect the general laws and characteristics of literary criticism texts, and have a certain value guiding effect on literary creation and literary criticism. It plays a guiding role in the development of contemporary literary values and the value orientation of literary creation and literary criticism. There are both correct guidance and value misdirection. As an important literary critical text, award-awarding word is a kind of isomorphic relationship with literary criticism. On the one hand, the development and perfection of literary award words must be based on the premise of the overall development and perfection of literary criticism, and the value system of literary criticism must be perfected to promote the overall optimization of the function of literary criticism's value-oriented orientation, on the other hand, The optimization of the value-oriented function of the awarding words will also promote the perfection of the value-oriented function of the literary criticism. Therefore, we must attach great importance to the unique role of the award words, establish a correct concept of award evaluation, and improve the overall quality of the subject of criticism. Perfect the mechanism of prize evaluation, perfect the standard of prize evaluation, and finally achieve the goal of mutual promotion of the two.
【学位授予单位】：山东理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：I206.7

【相似文献】