论“文学生活史”的范式转换
发布时间：2018-10-22 19:00
【摘要】："文学史重写"主要表现在文学史观层面的调整,又通常存在着历史观念与现实制约、逻辑建构与具体史实、框架结构与材料选择不相协调的矛盾,而"文学生活史"的介入,不失为文学史写作范式的一种选择。作为一种文学史的"文学生活史"命题的提出及其范式的转换,又至少包含三个既独立又融合的层面:一是以普通读者为中心的主体性选择,二是以日常生活为基础的价值性判断,三是以社会反应为参照的动态性描述,从而达成"对话性"文学史的写作,进而重建文学与生活的关系意义。
[Abstract]:The rewriting of literary history is mainly manifested in the adjustment of the view of literary history, and there are usually contradictions between historical concept and reality, logical construction and concrete historical facts, disharmony between frame structure and material selection, and the intervention of "literary life history". It is a choice of literary history writing paradigm. As a kind of literary history, the proposition of "literary life history" and the transformation of its paradigm include at least three levels of independence and integration: first, the subjective choice centered on ordinary readers; The second is the value judgment based on daily life, and the third is the dynamic description based on social reaction, so as to achieve the writing of "dialogue" literary history and reconstruct the significance of the relationship between literature and life.
【作者单位】： 山东大学文学院;
【分类号】：I207.42
本文编号：2288031
[Abstract]:The rewriting of literary history is mainly manifested in the adjustment of the view of literary history, and there are usually contradictions between historical concept and reality, logical construction and concrete historical facts, disharmony between frame structure and material selection, and the intervention of "literary life history". It is a choice of literary history writing paradigm. As a kind of literary history, the proposition of "literary life history" and the transformation of its paradigm include at least three levels of independence and integration: first, the subjective choice centered on ordinary readers; The second is the value judgment based on daily life, and the third is the dynamic description based on social reaction, so as to achieve the writing of "dialogue" literary history and reconstruct the significance of the relationship between literature and life.
【作者单位】： 山东大学文学院;
【分类号】：I207.42
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵志凡;简评《中国妓女生活史》[J];求索;1991年03期
2 陈科华;探索中国女性文化的新视角——读《中国妓女生活史》[J];益阳师专学报;1992年01期
3 朱德庸;;关于上班这件事[J];北京教育(成功就业版);2008年08期
4 胡艺文;;建国后第一部《中国妓女生活史》出版[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;1990年04期
5 向荣;;影像中的叙事[J];四川文学;2005年05期
6 菜鸟;;失落的文明——读《银元时代生活史》[J];商业文化;2008年02期
7 邱宏;;《洗澡》语言的对话性初探[J];当代小说(下);2010年08期
8 傅菲;;泥:另一种形式的生活史[J];辽河;2006年05期
9 ;资产阶级罪恶的有力见证——丝织女工梁凤生活史[J];学术研究;1965年03期
10 汤景泰;翟德耀;;内在对话性的生成——论老舍幽默小说的转型[J];山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2006年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 方晓;生活史原来可以这样写![N];中华读书报;2006年
2 刘方喜 中国社会科学院文学研究所;回应现实 推动范式转换[N];中国社会科学报;2011年
，本文编号：2288031
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/gudaiwenxuelunwen/2288031.html
