当前位置:主页 > 医学论文 > 护理论文 >

颅内碳青酶烯类耐药与敏感肠杆菌科细菌感染的治疗及其经济学损失分析

发布时间:2018-03-31 09:44

  本文选题:颅内感染 切入点:抗菌药物治疗 出处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2016年18期


【摘要】:目的探讨碳青酶烯类耐药肠杆菌(CRE)和碳青酶烯类敏感肠杆菌(CSE)颅内感染治疗效果和直接经济损失的差异,分析颅内感染治疗效果的影响因素。方法采用回顾性调查方法,选取医院2014年1月-2015年12月CRE和CSE颅内感染患者,按1∶1比例配对,将患者分为CRE组和CSE组,各12例;比较CRE和CSE颅内感染治疗效果和住院费用的差异,分析耐药情况和抗菌药物联合使用对治疗效果的影响。结果发现CRE颅内感染治愈率为41.67%,CSE颅内感染治愈率为91.67%,两组差异有统计学意义(P0.05);CRE组每床日医疗费用为7 008.82元,CSE组每床日医疗费用为2 777.75元,两组差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.252,P=0.024);碳青酶烯类联合其他药物治疗CRE颅内感染是常见的组合,治愈率66.67%,CSE颅内感染治疗以碳青酶烯类单药治疗为主,治愈率为91.67%;鞘内局部注射抗菌药物局部治疗,未提高CRE颅内感染的治愈率。结论 CRE颅内感染可明显增加患者的经济损失,临床治疗效果较CSE低,临床应积极采取有效措施进行预防控制。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the difference between the therapeutic efficacy and direct economic loss of enterobacter carbene resistance (CRE) and enterobacterium carboxylerenes (CSE) in the treatment of intracranial infection, and to analyze the factors affecting the therapeutic effect of intracranial infection. Methods retrospective investigation was used. From January 2014 to December 2015, the patients with intracranial infection of CRE and CSE were divided into two groups: CRE group and CSE group, according to 1:1 ratio, 12 patients in each group were divided into CRE group and CSE group, and the difference of treatment effect and hospitalization cost between CRE group and CSE group was compared. The effect of drug resistance and combined use of antimicrobial agents on the therapeutic effect was analyzed. The results showed that the cure rate of intracranial infection of CRE was 41.67 yuan, and the cure rate of intracranial infection of CRE was 91.67 yuan. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P 0.05). The daily medical cost per bed was 7 008.82 yuan in the CRE group. The daily medical cost per bed in CSE group was 2 777.75 yuan. There was significant difference between the two groups in the treatment of CRE intracranial infection, the cure rate was 66.67%, the cure rate was 66.67%, and the cure rate was 66.67%, the cure rate was 66.67%, the cure rate was 66.67%, and the cure rate was 66.67%, and the cure rate was 66.67%, and the cure rate was 66.67%. The cure rate was 91.67.The local treatment of intrathecal injection of antimicrobial agents did not improve the cure rate of CRE intracranial infection. Conclusion Intracranial CRE infection can significantly increase the economic loss of patients, and the clinical effect is lower than that of CSE. Effective measures should be taken in clinical prevention and control.
【作者单位】: 福建省肿瘤医院医院感染管理科;中南大学湘雅医院感染控制中心;
【基金】:湖南省自然科学基金(13JJ6013) 中南大学湘雅医院院内临床基金(2014-11);中南大学校级大数据基金(2014-33)
【分类号】:R446.5

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 蒯守刚;邵海枫;王卫萍;范明;黄梅;尤金炜;王颖;;耐碳青酶烯类肠杆菌科细菌的耐药机制研究[J];中华医院感染学杂志;2010年22期

2 张国伟,明德松,吴一波;4种酶抑制剂分类检测碳青酶烯酶的研究[J];中华医院感染学杂志;2004年10期

3 明德松,吴一波,朱焱,谢尊金;铜绿假单胞菌耐碳青酶烯类抗菌药物机制分类检测的研究[J];中华医院感染学杂志;2005年02期

4 顾怡明;郭丽;张杰;;耐碳青酶烯鲍氏不动杆菌碳青酶烯酶基因型的研究[J];中华医院感染学杂志;2009年13期

5 邱清芳;孙浩仙;邱学峰;程永娥;任福荣;;铜绿假单胞菌耐碳青酶烯类抗菌药物机制分类检测的研究[J];医学检验与临床;2007年04期

6 邱清芳;;铜绿假单胞菌耐碳青酶烯类抗菌药物机制分类检测的研究[J];中国实验诊断学;2007年08期

7 邱清芳;;铜绿假单胞菌耐碳青酶烯类抗菌药物机制分类检测的研究[J];医学检验与临床;2007年05期

8 李静;胡志东;;产碳青酶烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌的检测与分析[J];中华医院感染学杂志;2010年15期

9 郭普;乔艳;钟政荣;沈继录;李峰;;鲍氏不动杆菌对亚胺培南耐药性及碳青酶烯酶基因型分析[J];中华医院感染学杂志;2010年07期

10 陈萍;刘丁;方清永;王政;王豪;成瑶;南玲;黄庆玲;;耐碳青酶烯类肠杆菌科细菌医院感染危险因素分析[J];重庆医学;2014年26期

相关会议论文 前3条

1 王进;肖永红;刘远程;刘健;薛峰;杨维维;郝凤兰;;铜绿假单胞菌对碳青酶烯类药物的体外抗菌研究[A];第六届全国抗菌药物临床药理学术会议论文集[C];2006年

2 茹纳丹;吕火祥;胡庆丰;魏取好;沈蓓琼;;改良Hodge试验阳性肠杆菌科细菌对碳青酶烯类药物的耐药性检测方法比较[A];浙江省第十九届农村卫生改革与发展学术会议大会论文集[C];2011年

3 彭俊华;张媛媛;付藏红;张峰;马芳军;;鲍曼不动杆菌耐药表型及碳青酶烯酶OXA基因分析[A];中华医学会第八次全国检验医学学术会议暨中华医学会检验分会成立30周年庆典大会资料汇编[C];2009年



本文编号:1690188

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/huliyixuelunwen/1690188.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0fb25***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com