2014年北京协和医院细菌耐药性监测
[Abstract]:Objective to investigate the antimicrobial resistance of clinical bacteria isolated from Peking Union Hospital in 2014. Methods A total of 8 295 strains of non-repeated isolates were collected. Susceptibility tests were carried out by disk diffusion method or automatic instrument method. The drug sensitivity results were interpreted according to CLSI 2014 standard, and the data were analyzed by WHONET 5.6 software. Results among 8 295 strains of bacteria, The most common bacteria were Escherichia coli (18.1%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (10.8%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (10.2%), Staphylococcus aureus (9.8%), Acinetobacter baumannii (9.2%), Enterococcus faecalis (6.3%), faecium. Enterococcus (4.1%), coagulase-negative staphylococcus (4.1%), Enterobacter cloacae (3.1%) and Staphylococcus maltophilia (2.9%). The positive rates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococcus (MRCNS) were 28.4% and 66.5%, respectively. The resistance rate of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus to 尾 lactams and other antimicrobial agents was significantly higher than that of methicillin sensitive Staphylococcus. There were still 81.3% of MRSA susceptible to trimethoprim sulfamethamide.81.1% of the strains were rifampicin sensitive. No staphylococci resistant to vancomycin, teicoplanin and linazolamide were found. The resistance rate of Enterococcus faecalis to most antimicrobial agents (except chloramphenicol) was significantly lower than that of Enterococcus faecium. Vancomycin resistant Enterococcus (VRE) was found to be Van A and Van B resistance according to phenotype, but not to linazolamide resistant Enterococcus. The sensitivity rate of 尾 hemolytic streptococcus to penicillin was 90.8%. The positive rates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella (Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella acidogenic) and Proteus mirabilis were 54.2% and 28.9%, respectively. Enterobacteriaceae bacteria are still highly sensitive to carbapenes, and the total resistance rate is less than 3.3%. The detection rate of extensively resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae was 1.3%. The resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to imipenem and meropenem were 17.5% and 11.8%, respectively, and 5.9% to amikacin. The resistance rates of Acinetobacter baumannii to the above two carbapenems were 69.0% and 67.4%, respectively. The resistance rates to cefoperazone-sulbactam and minocycline were 47.8% and 28.7%, respectively. The detection rates of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 32.3% and 1.8%, respectively. The detection rate of 尾-lactamases in Haemophilus influenzae was 33. 7%. The resistance rate of Streptococcus pneumoniae to erythromycin and clindamycin was 933%. Conclusion the resistance rate of bacteria to antimicrobial agents is increasing, especially the carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae, which should take effective measures to control nosocomial infection and strengthen the rational use of antimicrobial agents.
【作者单位】: 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院检验科;
【分类号】:R446.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 周贵民,张军民;我国细菌耐药性监测应注意的几个问题[J];中华检验医学杂志;2004年01期
2 马越,金少鸿;细菌耐药性监测中质量控制的若干问题[J];中华检验医学杂志;2004年11期
3 陈翠敏,府伟灵,张晓兵;某教学医院细菌耐药性监测[J];中华医院感染学杂志;2005年04期
4 马越,金少鸿;我国细菌耐药性监测研究的新特点[J];中华检验医学杂志;2005年04期
5 金少鸿,马越;国内细菌耐药性监测研究的回顾与展望[J];中国抗生素杂志;2005年05期
6 童明庆;;必须重视抗菌药物敏感性试验和细菌耐药性监测[J];中华检验医学杂志;2005年12期
7 金少鸿;我国当前细菌耐药性监测工作的研究[J];中国处方药;2005年03期
8 农生洲;覃桂芳;;加强细菌耐药性监测的紧迫性及意义[J];广西医学;2006年01期
9 范友芬;许小敏;;我院近4年细菌耐药性监测结果分析[J];浙江医学;2006年05期
10 金少鸿;马越;;亚太地区细菌耐药性监测现状和展望[J];中国药物应用与监测;2006年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 卓超;;细菌耐药性监测对临床的指导意义[A];第十二次全国临床药理学学术会议会议论文集[C];2010年
2 艾效曼;陶凤蓉;陈东科;许宏涛;胡云建;;2009年北京医院细菌耐药性监测结果[A];第十届全国化疗药理暨抗感染药理高峰论坛资料汇编[C];2010年
3 范友芬;许小敏;;近3年烧伤病房细菌耐药性监测回顾[A];浙江省第十七届烧伤外科学学术会议论文汇编[C];2007年
4 刘伯让;;正骨医院细菌耐药性监测[A];中华医学会第七次全国检验医学学术会议资料汇编[C];2008年
5 李家斌;李慧;杨t 琦;;安徽省2004年细菌耐药性监测分析[A];中华医院管理学会第十二届全国医院感染管理学术年会论文汇编[C];2005年
6 刘晶;金玉芬;李艳蕾;尹金植;马忠森;;2010-2011年吉林大学第二医院细菌耐药性监测[A];中华医学会第七届全国呼吸道感染学术大会暨第一届多学科抗感染治疗学术研讨会论文汇编[C];2011年
7 刘晶;李艳蕾;金玉芬;尹金植;马忠森;;2010-2011年吉林大学第二医院细菌耐药性监测[A];中华医学会呼吸病学年会——2011(第十二次全国呼吸病学学术会议)论文汇编[C];2011年
8 金细众;杨坤;余德锁;陈势;林芙蓉;;2007-2008年临床分离细菌耐药性监测与分析[A];第三届重症医学大会论文汇编[C];2009年
9 杨彬;张坚磊;郭影;穆红;彭林;;2011年第四季度天津市细菌耐药性监测[A];中华医学会第七次全国中青年检验医学学术会议论文汇编[C];2012年
10 胡同平;张文兰;张永梅;乌兰;乔姝;张利霞;菅建国;;2008年临床常见分离细菌耐药性监测[A];中华医学会第八次全国检验医学学术会议暨中华医学会检验分会成立30周年庆典大会资料汇编[C];2009年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 ;细菌耐药性监测任重道远[N];中国医药报;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 王群;1993株临床分离细菌耐药性监测[D];重庆医科大学;2012年
,本文编号:2127159
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/huliyixuelunwen/2127159.html