中文版压疮愈合状态评价及分类量表DESIGN-R的信效度研究

发布时间：2018-09-06 09:08

【摘要】：目的翻译和修订日文版压疮愈合状态评价及分类量表,形成中文版压疮愈合状态评价及分类量表,并在中国压疮患者中使用,检验其在中国压疮患者中使用时的信度和效度。方法在获得作者授权后,以Brislin的翻译模型为基础,严格按照翻译程序对日文版压疮愈合状态评价及分类量表进行翻译、回译和跨文化调适,形成中文版压疮愈合状态评价及分类量表。然后采用便利抽样方法选取压疮患者,收集患者基本信息和压疮照片。最后请5名评价者使用翻译的中文版压疮愈合状态评价及分类量表对压疮照片进行评分,对评分结果进行重测信度、内部一致性信度、评定者间信度、内容效度和结构效度的初步评定。结果内容效度分析显示经7名专家评定的中文版压疮愈合状态评价及分类量表的内容效度指数为0.93。各条目与总分的相关系数(除深度外)为0.46~0.80,差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。探索性因子分析提取了2个公因子,累积方差贡献率为64.53%,并在相应项目上有较强的因子负荷。量表的Cronbach'sα系数为0.82;分半信度系数为0.76。各条目的评定者间信度ICC是0.79~0.99,重测信度的ICC是0.90。各条目删除后量表的Cronbach’sα系数为0.70~0.79。结论本研究表明中文版压疮愈合状态评价及分类量表在中国压疮患者中具有良好的信度和效度,可用于中国压疮患者压疮愈合过程的量化评价。
[Abstract]:Objective to translate and revise the Japanese version of the pressure sore healing state evaluation and classification scale to form the Chinese version pressure sore healing state evaluation and classification scale, and to test its reliability and validity when used in Chinese pressure sore patients. Methods on the basis of Brislin's translation model, the Japanese version of pressure sore healing status evaluation and classification scale were translated, translated and cross-cultural adjusted strictly according to the translation procedure after obtaining the authorizations of the author. To form the Chinese version of pressure ulcer healing state evaluation and classification scale. Then the convenience sampling method was used to select the patients with pressure sore and collect the basic information and photo of the patients. Finally, five evaluators were asked to use the translated Chinese version of the pressure sore healing status evaluation and classification scale to evaluate the image of the pressure sore, and to retest the reliability, internal consistency reliability, and assess the reliability of the score results. Preliminary evaluation of content validity and structural validity. Results the content validity analysis showed that the content validity index of the Chinese version of pressure sore healing status evaluation and classification scale was 0.93. The correlation coefficient (except depth) between each item and total score was 0.46 ~ 0.80, the difference was statistically significant (P0.01). Two common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, the cumulative variance contribution rate was 64.53, and there was a strong factor load on the corresponding items. The Cronbach's 伪 coefficient and split-half reliability coefficient of the scale were 0. 82 and 0. 76 respectively. The reliability (ICC) of each item was 0. 79 / 0. 99, and the ICC of retest reliability was 0. 90. The Cronbach's 伪 coefficient of each item after deletion was 0.70 卤0.79. Conclusion the Chinese version of the scale has good reliability and validity and can be used in the quantitative evaluation of the healing process of Chinese pressure sore patients.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：R473

【相似文献】