血液感染优势细菌和真菌种类分析及Verigene-DNA芯片快速检测效果的研究
[Abstract]:Purpose To understand the species and drug resistance of the blood-infected bacteria and fungi in the third People's Hospital of Hangzhou from 2008 to 2014, and to study the effect of the Veriene-DNA chip on the rapid detection of the Gram-positive bacteria in the blood Fruit. Methods The bacteria and fungi were isolated and cultured in 19789 human peripheral blood samples by using BacT/ ALERT3D blood specimen culture system and one-sided single-bottle, one-sided double-bottle and two-sided double-bottle method. The strains were identified by the VITEK2Compact system and the paper-paper diffusion method, respectively. Sensitivity of the element. The test-tested bacterial isolates, p-, were confirmed using the CLSI-recommended method of paper diffusion. The positive rate of isolation and culture of different blood culture modes, the superiority of the bacteria or the fungi, and the drug sensitivity of the isolated strains were investigated by using the statistical software. Sex analysis was carried out. The isolated 98 strains of Gram-positive bacteria were identified by the Veriene-DNA chip and their drug-resistant genes were tested. The results of the strain identification were compared with the VITEK2Compact system. PC Results In the above 19789 peripheral blood samples, the positive rate of bacterial and fungal blood culture (29,22%) of the two-sided double-bottle method was significantly higher than that of one-sided single-bottle (8.28%) and one-sided double-bottle (12.34 %) (p0.01). Among the 124 isolated strains of 1876, Staphylococcus hominis, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Staphylococcus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphyloc@@ S (s capitis), Enterococcus faecium, Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterococcus faecalis were 11.46%-3.00% and the remaining 114 species were isolated. The separation rates of Candida parapsilosis, Candida albicans, Candida glabrata and Candida guillimondii were 25.00%, 21.32%, 16.91% and 11.76%, respectively, and the other 14 fungi were isolated. The isolation rate was less than 8%. All of the strains of Staphylococci were sensitive to rilenalidomide, vancomycin and tigecycline, but the rate of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococci (MRCoNS) (87.88%,116/132) was significantly higher than that of methicillin-resistant S. aureus, MRS A) (54.77%,109/199) (p0.01). The sensitive rate of tigecycline was 100% in 92 strains of Enterococcus faecium and 56 strains of Enterococcus faecium, and the sensitive rate of the rilenalamine was 97.01% and 95.56%, respectively. The detection rates of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) were 15.22% (14/92) and 8.93% (5/56) respectively. The sensitivity of imipenem, ertapenem, tigecycline, cefotitan, amikacin, zacillin/ tafluvial/ tafluvial and babbitum was 92.31%-99.52%, but 1.03% and 0.48% of the strains were resistant to carbapenem The sensitivity of 122 strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae to amikacin, cefotitan, tigecycline and compound neomycin was 77.05%-79.51%, but 32.71% and 31.15% respectively applied to carbapenem antibacterial drug. The sensitivity of the 71 strains of Acinetobacter baumannii to polymyxin B, tigecycline, amikacin, and ceftriaxone/ sulbactam was 60% to 100%, and 29 strains of Candida albicans were sensitive to fluconazole, Iqu concha, g. The sensitive rate of mycotoxin,5-fluorophonate, nystatin and amphotericin B was 100%, and the sensitivity of 34 strains of near-smooth Candida to 5-fluorophonate and myxin B was 100%. The sensitive rate of the 5-fluorophonate, the amphotericin B and the myxin B was 100%, but the sensitive rate was 56.52% ~ 85.71%, and the sensitive rate was 56.52% ~ 85.71%. The 16 strains were also sensitive to 5-fluoro-cytomycin and amphotericin B. The results of the identification of 16 98 strains of Gram-positive bacteria and VITEK2Compact system were 91.84% (90/98), 91.67% (55/60), 92.59% (25/27) and 90.00% (9/10), respectively. At the time of the identification, about 3.1 h, but when the VITEK2Compact system was identified for about 43 h.22 strains of S. aureus and 12 S. epidermidis, the Verigene-DNA chip method was used to detect 21 and 8 strains of methicillin-resistant related mecA gene, and the result of the PCR was completely consistent with that of the 9 strains of Enterococcus faecalis. And 1 and 5 strains of vancomycin-resistant vanA gene were detected by the Veriene-DNA chip method, and the results of PCR were the same, but the results of PCR showed that 2 strains of enterococcus faecium were found. bacteria-carrying Conclusion The two-sided double-bottle method can increase the blood sample. The positive rate of bacterial and fungal isolates was positive. The dominant blood-infected bacteria were Staphylococcus, E. coli, S. aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis (10%), and the dominant blood-infected fungi were Candida, Candida albicans, and Nostoglobus glabrata. In spite of the differences in the sensitivity of different kinds of bacteria and fungal clinical strains to different antibacterial drugs, the Gram-positive strain has a high sensitivity to the tigecycline and tigecycline, and the Gram-negative strains are highly sensitive to tigecycline and Amicka. 5-fluoro-1-(5-fluoro-1)-(2-)-(2-)-(5-fluorophenyl) in comparison with that VITEK2compact system, the Veriene-DNA chip method has the advantages of fast, accurate, simple and convenient and simultaneous detection of the bacterial drug resistance gene,
【学位授予单位】:浙江大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:R446.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 丁爽;闫玲;李若倩;黄平;马萍;;PCT和CRP对菌血症的诊断价值比较[J];国际检验医学杂志;2014年07期
2 严育忠;范惠清;徐英;周秀梅;陆燕春;;两种检测超广谱β-内酰胺酶表型方法的比较[J];中国感染控制杂志;2012年05期
3 李光辉;朱德妹;汪复;倪语星;孙景勇;徐英春;张小江;胡云建;艾效曼;俞云松;林洁;孙自镛;陈中举;贾蓓;黄文祥;卓超;苏丹虹;魏莲花;吴玲;张朝霞;季萍;王传清;王爱敏;张泓;孔菁;徐元宏;沈继录;单斌;杜艳;杨青;;2011年中国CHINET血培养临床分离菌的分布及耐药性[J];中国感染与化疗杂志;2013年04期
4 张慧;杨启文;徐英春;谢秀丽;陈民钧;;北京协和医院2000~2013年血培养病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J];检验医学与临床;2014年18期
5 李光辉;朱德妹;汪复;胡志东;李全;孙自镛;陈中举;徐英春;张小江;王传清;王爱敏;倪语星;孙景勇;褚云卓;俞云松;林洁;徐元宏;沈继录;苏丹虹;卓超;魏莲花;吴玲;张朝霞;季萍;张泓;孔菁;胡云建;艾效曼;单斌;杜艳;;2012年中国CHINET血培养临床分离菌的分布及耐药性[J];中国感染与化疗杂志;2014年06期
6 徐英春;临床微生物学血培养操作规范[J];中华检验医学杂志;2004年02期
7 彭佳;府伟灵;张晓兵;;血培养中真菌的分布及耐药性分析[J];中华医院感染学杂志;2006年11期
8 李冰;郭珊;吕锦琪;;血流感中的病原菌分布及耐药性分析[J];中国微生态学杂志;2014年03期
9 张凯;喻华;黄湘宁;刘鑫;黄影;;四川省细菌耐药监测网2011~2012年血流感染病原菌分布及耐药分析[J];实用医院临床杂志;2014年06期
10 杨兵,陈小青,严杰;腹膜炎患者临床标本中无芽孢厌氧菌的分离和鉴定[J];微生物学杂志;2001年04期
,本文编号:2506283
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/huliyixuelunwen/2506283.html