黔东南州岜扒村参与式规划实践与反思

发布时间：2018-01-20 01:32

本文关键词： 参与式规划村庄规划公众参与岜扒村　出处：《西安建筑科技大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：城乡规划作为一项公共政策,编制与实施中多元主体的参与十分必要。在住建部和无止桥基金会的支持下研究团队在岜扒村开展参与式规划实践研究,实践中呈现出村民参与意识淡薄、参与积极性差,并出现与相关部门就村庄建设问题斡旋调解失败、急功近利的村干部对研究团队质疑,村民对村庄发展及文化传承的冷漠等一系列参与失效的问题。因此,研究以岜扒村参与式规划实践为对象,回顾与反思实践过程,总结经验教训。研究基于国内外参与式规划理论与方法的梳理及案例借鉴,建构参与式规划路径的理论框架用以指导岜扒村参与式规划实践;并从前期调研、方案交流、规划评审、项目实施四个阶段回顾实践中的不同境遇,总结经验教训及面临的现实困境;基于政治学、经济学、文化学、社会学等多学科的理论视野,思考并挖掘问题的本质,澄清乡村参与式规划建设陷入困境的深层次原因;并以岜扒实践中的问题为导向、原因探析为基础,对现实环境下规划学科及规划专业人员如何推动参与式规划的发展提出相应建议。研究认为:岜扒实践陷入困境源于当前政治、经济、文化、社会等因素的影响,政治、经济因素是导致参与失效的核心因素。政治因素决定多元主体参与的成长性质,是主导村民能否参与、参与深度的主要因素。经济因素是参与式规划开展的物质基础,影响参与主体的参与意识与能力。文化因素是村民参与意识淡薄、组织化程度低的重要原因。乡村社会的局限性及变化的社会结构也影响村民参与。因此,参与式规划的开展是一项社会系统工程,发展任重道远,现实环境中规划工作者应回归理性,通过切实可行的规划行动推动参与式规划的研究与实践。随着制度的完善、经济的发展、公民社会的成长,参与式规划将会在适宜的土壤中更好的发展。
[Abstract]:Urban and rural planning as a public policy, the preparation and implementation of the participation of multiple subjects is very necessary. Under the support of the Ministry of Housing and Non-stop Bridge Foundation, the research team carried out participatory planning practice research in Basha village. In practice, villagers' participation consciousness is weak, participation enthusiasm is poor, and with the relevant departments on the issue of village construction mediation failure, eager for quick success of the village cadres questioned the research team. The villagers' apathy to the village development and the cultural inheritance and so on a series of participation invalidation questions. Therefore, the research takes the Basha village participatory planning practice as the object, reviews and reflects the practice process. Based on the theories and methods of participatory planning at home and abroad and case studies, the paper constructs the theoretical framework of participatory planning path to guide the practice of participatory planning in Bazaowan village. And from the previous research, program exchange, planning review, project implementation of the four stages of the review of different circumstances in practice, summing up experience and lessons and the practical difficulties faced; Based on the theory of politics, economics, culture, sociology and so on, the author ponders and excavates the essence of the problem, and clarifies the deep reason why the rural participatory planning and construction falls into a dilemma. And based on the problems in the practice of Basha bazaar, the analysis of the reasons is the foundation. This paper puts forward corresponding suggestions on how to promote the development of participatory planning in the field of planning and planning professionals in the realistic environment. The research shows that the predicament of Basha's practice stems from the current politics, economy and culture. The influence of social factors, political and economic factors are the core factors that lead to the failure of participation. Political factors determine the growth nature of multi-subject participation, is the dominant participation of villagers. The main factors of the depth of participation. Economic factors are the material basis of participatory planning, which affects the participation consciousness and ability of the participants. The cultural factor is the weak participation consciousness of villagers. The limitation of rural society and the changing social structure also affect villagers' participation. Therefore, the development of participatory planning is a social system engineering, and the development of it has a long way to go. In the realistic environment, planners should return to rationality and promote the research and practice of participatory planning through feasible planning actions. With the improvement of system, the development of economy and the growth of civil society. Participatory planning will develop better in the right soil.
【学位授予单位】：西安建筑科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：TU982.29

【参考文献】