HRB500级并筋混凝土柱抗震性能有限元分析
本文选题:HRB500级钢筋 切入点:并筋 出处:《南昌航空大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:实际建筑工程中经常会遇到由于配筋密集引起的设计、施工困难问题,工程中会采用绑扎多根单筋成束,即并筋构造来解决问题。我国《混凝土结构设计规范》(GB 50010-2010)中首次提出了并筋的构造规定,并筋造成的粘结锚固性能下降,在配置高强钢筋的情况下尤为突出。本文在现有HRB500并筋混凝土柱试验的基础上,结合并筋粘结锚固拉拔试验进行ANSYS有限元模拟分析,得出并筋混凝土柱应力、应变、裂缝、承载力及延性系数相关结论,为今后并筋混凝土柱的应用参考。主要工作如下:(1)利用ANSYS有限元软件模拟并筋混凝土柱开裂、屈服、破坏的过程,得出随着并筋数量增加,构件极限承载力下降、整体变形增大、延性系数下降的结论,有限元分析结果与试验结果基本一致。并筋混凝土柱延性系数下降幅度最大为13.1%,对构件抗震性能有一定的影响。(2)对比考虑不同钢筋混凝土粘结滑移本构关系对并筋混凝土柱承载力、位移的影响。利用ANSYS有限元软件分别按同课题组拉拔试验粘结滑移本构关系、考虑Houde经验公式粘结滑移本构关系、不考虑钢筋与混凝土的粘结滑移3种情况建模分析。结果表明:考虑粘结滑移本构关系的有限元模型,承载力下降、位移减小,与并筋混凝土柱试验结果更吻合;并筋与混凝土之间按Houde滑移本构关系分析结果比按拉拔试验滑移本构关系分析结果承载力更小,但差异在5%范围内,对于HRB500钢筋并筋也可采用Houde滑移本构关系进行分析。(3)在按并筋等效原则和应用Houde粘结滑移本构关系的前提下,调整构件轴压比和混凝土强度,分析HRB500并筋混凝土柱受力性能和抗震性能。结果表明:构件轴压比上升时,构件承载力和延性整体下降,并筋混凝土柱极限承载力下降速率与单筋混凝土柱类似,并筋混凝土柱延性下降速率高于单筋混凝土柱;使用高强混凝土的情况下,并筋混凝土柱构件极限承载力与单筋混凝土柱差距不大;随着混凝土等级增加,构件延性增加,并筋混凝土柱构件延性的上升速率小于单筋混凝土柱构件。
[Abstract]:In actual construction projects, the design and construction difficulties caused by the dense reinforcement will often be encountered. In the engineering, many single tendons will be bound to form bundles. In our country's Code for Design of concrete structures (GB 50010-2010), it is the first time that the construction regulation of parallel reinforcement is put forward, and the bonding and anchoring performance of the reinforcement decreases. In this paper, the stress, strain and crack of reinforced concrete column are obtained by ANSYS finite element simulation analysis, based on the existing test of HRB500 reinforced concrete column, combined with the test of bond anchoring and drawing of parallel reinforcement bar, the stress, strain and crack of reinforced concrete column are obtained. The conclusions of bearing capacity and ductility coefficient are used as reference for the application of reinforced concrete columns in the future. The main work is as follows: 1) using ANSYS finite element software to simulate the process of cracking, yielding and failure of reinforced concrete columns, it is concluded that with the increase of the number of parallel reinforcement, The conclusion that the ultimate bearing capacity of the member decreases, the whole deformation increases and the ductility coefficient decreases, The results of finite element analysis are in good agreement with the experimental results. The ductility coefficient of reinforced concrete columns decreases by the maximum of 13.1, which has a certain effect on the seismic behavior of members. Bearing capacity of reinforced concrete columns, The influence of displacement. The bond-slip constitutive relation of Houde empirical formula is considered by using ANSYS finite element software according to the bond-slip constitutive relation of drawing test in the same group. The results show that the finite element model considering the bond-slip constitutive relationship decreases the bearing capacity and displacements, which is more consistent with the experimental results of concrete columns with parallel reinforcement. The results of Houde's slip constitutive relation analysis between the steel bars and the concrete are smaller than that of the tensile test's slip constitutive relations, but the difference is in the range of 5%. The Houde slip constitutive relation can also be used for the analysis of HRB500 steel bars. (3) on the basis of the equivalent principle of parallel reinforcement and the application of Houde bond-slip constitutive relation, the axial compression ratio and the strength of concrete can be adjusted. The results show that the ultimate bearing capacity and ductility of HRB500 reinforced concrete columns decrease when the axial compression ratio increases, and the decreasing rate of ultimate bearing capacity of reinforced concrete columns is similar to that of single reinforced concrete columns. The decreasing rate of ductility of reinforced concrete columns is higher than that of single reinforced concrete columns. Under the condition of high strength concrete, the ultimate bearing capacity of concrete columns with parallel reinforcement is not far from that of concrete columns with single reinforcement. With the increase of concrete grade, the ductility of concrete columns increases. The rising rate of ductility of concrete column members with parallel reinforcement is smaller than that of concrete columns with single reinforcement.
【学位授予单位】:南昌航空大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:TU375.3;TU352.11
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李文旭;刘庆文;徐青峗;吕超;;中美欧规范中并筋构造对比分析[J];南昌航空大学学报(自然科学版);2016年02期
2 朱伟庆;贾金青;;型钢超高强混凝土柱抗震性能试验研究[J];建筑结构学报;2015年04期
3 杨勇;于云龙;王欣林;安康;泮勇溥;;预应力钢带约束钢管混凝土叠合柱抗震性能试验研究[J];工业建筑;2015年03期
4 葛文杰;张继文;曹大富;戴航;;HRBF500级钢筋混凝土柱抗震性能研究[J];工程抗震与加固改造;2014年02期
5 王秋维;史庆轩;姜维山;张兴虎;侯炜;田园;;新型截面型钢混凝土柱抗震性能试验研究[J];建筑结构学报;2013年11期
6 赵卫平;范玉辉;李刚;;高强混凝土与钢筋粘结-滑移的数值模拟[J];兰州交通大学学报;2010年06期
7 周发江;;地震危害及地震预警研究[J];改革与开放;2010年08期
8 梅毕祥;贾益纲;许明;刘在今;;基于ANSYS的钢筋混凝土梁收敛问题对策分析[J];南昌工程学院学报;2009年03期
9 曾鹏;刘清;叶建荣;;利用ANSYS模拟钢筋混凝土中的收敛问题的对策[J];四川建筑;2008年03期
10 王铁宏;亟需推广应用高强钢筋和高性能混凝土[J];建设科技;2005年06期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 张曦;张素梅;刘界鹏;;钢管约束高强钢筋混凝土短柱抗震性能试验研究[A];第九届全国现代结构工程学术研讨会论文集[C];2009年
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 王晓锋;配置高强钢筋混凝土框架柱抗震性能研究[D];中国建筑科学研究院;2013年
2 刘祖强;型钢混凝土异形柱框架抗震性能及设计方法研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2012年
3 任凤鸣;钢管混凝土框架—核心筒减震结构的抗震性能研究[D];广州大学;2012年
4 曲福来;钢筋混凝土不等肢异形柱抗震性能试验研究[D];大连理工大学;2008年
5 傅剑平;钢筋混凝土框架节点抗震性能与设计方法研究[D];重庆大学;2002年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 李文旭;HRB500并筋混凝土柱抗震性能试验研究[D];南昌航空大学;2016年
2 曹继涛;中美欧规范钢筋混凝土框架结构抗震设计对比研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2013年
3 蒋志楠;我国建筑抗震规范中部分条款的演变及与欧美规范的对比探讨[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2010年
4 陈继东;高强箍筋约束高强混凝土柱抗震性能试验和非线性分析[D];西安建筑科技大学;2009年
5 李剑;中美抗震规范的地震作用计算与钢筋混凝土结构抗震措施的比较研究[D];中国建筑科学研究院;2005年
6 陈磊;基于ANSYS的钢筋混凝土结构试验有限元分析[D];西安理工大学;2004年
,本文编号:1619583
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jianzhugongchenglunwen/1619583.html