济南市典型土岩双元基坑破坏模式及其支护结构选型研究
本文选题:土岩双元基坑边坡 + 破坏模式 ; 参考:《山东大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:基于济南市土岩地质条件,运用PLAXIS 3D有限元软件,分析典型土岩双元地层结构基坑边坡破坏模式,研究微型桩复合土钉墙与吊脚桩支护结构的变形及受力规律,取得结论如下:1、破坏模式土+全风化岩边坡可视为整体土层,破坏模式为圆弧滑动面;土+全风化岩石+强风化岩石型边坡,坡率大于1:0.8时,土层、全风化岩层和部分强风化岩层发生圆弧滑动破坏;坡率小于1:0.8时,土层全风化岩层发生圆弧滑动破坏,破坏面底端与强风化岩层界面相切,强风化岩层内不发生破坏。土+全风化岩石+强风化岩石+中风化岩石型基坑,坡率大于1:0.8时,土层、全风化岩层和部分强风化岩层发生圆弧滑动破坏;坡率小于1:0.8时,土层全风化岩层发生圆弧滑动破坏,破坏面底端与强风化岩层界面相切;中风化岩层始终不发生破坏。2、微型桩复合土钉墙支护结构相对桩锚支护结构来说,桩径小,桩身材料强度高,桩间距紧密;变形控制效果略弱于桩锚支护结构,内力控制效果优于桩锚支护结构。内力峰值状态在开挖至中风化岩层界面时出现,变形峰值状态在开挖至基坑底时出现,破坏面为一条位于土层和碎石层内部的圆弧滑动面,底端相切于中风化岩界面。3、吊脚支护桩结构桩体的变形以及内力峰值状态在开挖至中风化岩层界面时出现。破坏面为一条位于土层内部的圆弧滑动面,底端相切于土岩界面,中风化岩层不会破坏。吊脚桩嵌固1.5m和岩肩宽度0.5-1m为吊脚支护桩结构最佳构造,利于内力和位移控制。
[Abstract]:Based on the geological conditions of soil and rock in Jinan city, the failure mode of foundation pit slope of typical soil-rock double-element formation structure is analyzed by using PLAXIS 3D finite element software, and the deformation and force law of micro-pile composite soil nailing wall and hoisting pile supporting structure are studied. The results are as follows: 1. The soil weathered rock slope can be regarded as a whole soil layer, the failure mode is a circular sliding surface, and the soil layer with a slope ratio greater than 1: 0.8 is strongly weathered rock slope with soil weathering rock. When the slope ratio is less than 1: 0.8, the total weathered rock layer will be destroyed by arc sliding, the interface between the bottom of the failure surface and the strongly weathered rock layer will be tangent, and the strong weathered rock layer will not be destroyed. When the slope ratio is greater than 1: 0.8, the circular sliding failure occurs in soil layer, weathered rock layer and part of strongly weathered rock layer, and when the slope ratio is less than 1: 0.8, The total weathering rock layer of soil layer is destroyed by arc sliding, and the bottom end of the failure surface is tangent to the interface of strongly weathered rock layer, and the medium weathered rock layer does not occur damage of .2. the pile diameter is small relative to the pile anchor support structure of the micro-pile composite soil nailing wall. The effect of deformation control is slightly weaker than that of pile-anchor support structure, and the effect of internal force control is better than that of pile-anchor support structure. The peak state of internal force appears at the interface between excavation and middle weathering strata, and the peak state of deformation occurs when excavating to the bottom of foundation pit. The failure surface is a circular slip surface located in the soil layer and the gravel layer. The bottom end is tangent to the interface of medium weathered rock. The deformation of pile body and the peak state of internal force of suspending support pile structure appear at the interface between excavation and middle weathering strata. The failure surface is a circular slip surface located inside the soil layer, and the bottom end is cut to the interface of the earth rock, and the middle weathered rock layer will not be destroyed. The optimum structure of hoisting support pile is 1.5 m fixed and 0.5-1m width of rock shoulder, which is favorable for internal force and displacement control.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:TU753
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 涂启柱;;桩+喷锚支护在某新建站房土岩结合深基坑中的应用[J];铁道标准设计;2016年05期
2 宋娜;蔡善兵;;济南区域土岩结合基坑支护设计探讨[J];江西建材;2016年06期
3 赵会艳;路丽芳;张丽敏;张剑光;;土岩组合地铁深基坑施工期变形规律研究[J];公路;2016年02期
4 钟炎;傅勤安;;土钉墙技术与微型桩联合土钉墙支护机理探析[J];安徽建筑;2015年06期
5 蔡景萍;;土岩组合地层地铁深基坑地表变形规律研究[J];中外公路;2015年04期
6 田海光;;土岩组合地层盖挖法车站“吊脚桩”基坑设计优化研究[J];隧道建设;2015年07期
7 庄岳欢;冯龙飞;葛梁;;土岩二元地层深基坑复合土钉墙的应用分析[J];广东土木与建筑;2015年07期
8 刘小丽;彭晶;;邻近建筑物超载深度对土岩组合基坑开挖变形影响的研究[J];工业建筑;2015年04期
9 白晓宇;张明义;袁海洋;;移动荷载作用下土岩组合基坑吊脚桩变形分析[J];岩土力学;2015年04期
10 辛建平;郑颖人;唐晓松;;基于弹塑性模型的微型抗滑桩破坏机制研究[J];岩石力学与工程学报;2014年S2期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 胡海峰;不同土岩比复合介质地表沉陷规律及预测研究[D];太原理工大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 吴铁力;大连地区土岩组合基坑排桩嵌固深度的研究[D];吉林大学;2015年
2 李白;微型钢管桩在岩石基坑支护工程中的应用研究[D];中国海洋大学;2012年
,本文编号:1913147
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jianzhugongchenglunwen/1913147.html