C公司CB类产品项目设计进度试验研究

发布时间：2018-06-14 09:26

本文选题：设计进度 + 工程设计　；参考：《西南交通大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：当前对于建设工程项目的设计进度研究已非常深入和全面,如关键路线法(CPM)和计划评审技术(PERT)等网络计划技术都有相当广泛的应用。但这些研究都重点关注工作之间的衔接和逻辑关系,并未对工作本身进行研究,特别是在工作持续时间设置的准确度方面。再因设计质量是评价设计工作好坏的首要标准,所以本文以设计质量合格为先决条件,采用试验的方法判定设计进度设置准确度,并探寻进度可压缩的范围。本文首先论证了试验法应用于设计进度研究的可行性。再通过试验前分析,规避了试验无参考依据、结论无类似项目进行应用、试验过程干扰因素过多、评价标准不明确等风险。随后对试验的内容进行设计,这是本文的重点也是难点所在,分别从试验的难度、时间安排、人员组织、评价标准等进行设计,在形成试验条件后进行实施,并可以参试让人员自行安排试验开始时间,在最大程度上保证试验的连续性和准确性。试验结束后,对试验成品文件按统一标准进行评价,将定性的校审记录转化为定量的分类数据,再依据分配给各组的试验时间和其设计文件的错误,研究设计进度与设计质量间的关系。并按照设计文件的合格标准,找出能达到要求的最短时间。由此判断在设计时间安排上,原有经验数据能否进行缩减,最后得出初步结论。在有初步结论后进行实例研究,选取C公司正在进行的类似项目,利用初步结论对其惯用进度计划进行调整,项目按调整的进度实施完成后,将校审记录按评价标准进行定量汇总,再结合几个已完成的类似项目做参照对比,分析初步结论的合理性,并得出最终结论。
[Abstract]:At present, the research on the design progress of the construction project has been very thorough and comprehensive, such as the critical route method (CPM) and the planning review technology (PERT) and so on network planning technology has the quite widespread application. However, these studies focus on the cohesion and logical relationship between the work, not on the work itself, especially on the accuracy of the work duration setting. Because the design quality is the primary criterion for evaluating the quality of the design work, this paper takes the design quality as the prerequisite, uses the method of experiment to judge the accuracy of the design schedule setting, and explores the range of the compressibility of the design progress. In this paper, the feasibility of applying the experimental method to the design schedule research is demonstrated. Through the analysis before the test, the risk is avoided, such as no reference basis, no application of similar items, too many interference factors in the test process, unclear evaluation criteria, and so on. Then the content of the experiment is designed, which is the key and difficult point of this paper. It is designed from the difficulty of the experiment, the time arrangement, the organization of personnel, the evaluation standard and so on. After the test conditions are formed, the design is carried out. The participants can arrange the start time of the test to ensure the continuity and accuracy of the test to the greatest extent. At the end of the test, the finished product documents were evaluated according to the unified standard, and the qualitative examination records were converted into the quantitative classification data, and then according to the test time allocated to each group and the error of the design document, Study the relationship between design schedule and design quality. And according to the design documents qualified standards, to find out the minimum time to achieve the requirements. From this, we can judge whether the original experience data can be reduced in the design time arrangement, and finally draw a preliminary conclusion. After a case study is carried out after the preliminary conclusion is reached, we select a similar project that is being carried out by Company C, and use the preliminary conclusion to adjust its customary progress plan. After the project is completed according to the schedule of the adjustment, According to the evaluation criteria, this paper summarizes the records of the school examination quantitatively, and then makes a reference and comparison with several similar items that have been completed, analyzes the rationality of the preliminary conclusions, and draws the final conclusions.
【学位授予单位】：西南交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：TU201

【参考文献】