基于结构主义方法论的建筑可变性设计研究

发布时间：2018-06-23 19:31

本文选题：结构主义 + 方法论　；参考：《山东建筑大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文旨在亚历杭德罗·阿拉维纳获得2016年普利茨克建筑奖的背景下,对基于结构主义方法论的建筑可变性设计思想与实践源流进行系统整理,归纳其设计体系,并结合当前背景与趋势对建筑可变性设计未来的发展作出展望。这类建筑设计思路在结构主义哲学广泛流行的20世纪60年代开始集中涌现,包括以阿尔多·凡·艾克与赫曼·赫茨伯格为代表的荷兰结构主义建筑,以约纳·弗里德曼、建筑电讯集团和新陈代谢运动为代表的技术乌托邦式建筑理论实践,以及以约翰·哈布拉肯的SAR体系支撑体住宅、开放建筑运动为代表的反乌托邦式的建筑理论实践等方面。与阿拉维纳的住房项目相似,它们均展现了以结构主义方法论为基础的、预留建筑可变性的特征,可被一同纳入到“基于结构主义方法论的建筑可变性设计”这一统一框架下进行研究与比较。同时,基于共同的方法论基础和可变性设计意图,它们发展出了各自不同的建筑可变性设计方法模式,使我们能够通过理论与实践两个层面的分析,总结其设计体系与思路,并在当前的社会背景下予以再定位。本文试图通过“基于结构主义方法论的建筑可变性设计”这一共同的体系框架对上述各类实践进行研究与辨析,找出这类建筑在设计操作层面的基本模式,在共时与历时的基础上总结其设计体系,为当前背景下进行建筑可变性设计提供更为全面的参照与思路。在此基础上,本文分为四个部分,共六章。第一部分(第1章)阐述了研究背景、研究目的、国内外研究现状、研究内容与框架及研究意义。第二部分(第2章至第4章)从结构主义方法论和建筑可变性两个层面检视了20世纪60年代至今的各类建筑思想与实践,提出统一的研究框架与范畴,并在此范畴内对所涉及的典型建筑理论与实践分别进行分析、对比与总结。以历时的对比研究为基础,归纳结构主义方法论与建筑可变性设计目标对应到建筑体系下的设计方法论,指出建筑可变性设计的基本观念开放性基础结构在建筑物质体系与功能体系下的构成方式。第三部分(第5章)基于上述研究,对应到当前的数字化建筑设计背景下对未来的可能性作出预期和展望。最后,第6章作为结语,总结了全文的结论与不足,并指出了未来的研究方向。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to systematize the source and practice of architectural variability design based on structuralism methodology under the background of Alejandro Alavena winning the 2016 Pritzker Architecture Award, and to sum up its design system. Combined with the current background and trend, the future development of architectural variability design is prospected. Such architectural design ideas began to emerge in the 1960s, when structuralist philosophy became popular, including Dutch structuralist architecture represented by Aldo Van Eyck and Herman Hertzberg, and Jonah Friedman. The Utopian architectural theory and practice represented by architectural telecommunication group and metabolic movement, and the anti-utopian architectural theory practice represented by John Hablarken's SAR system support house and open building movement. Similar to Alavina's housing projects, they all exhibit structural methodological features that allow for architectural variability. It can be studied and compared under the unified framework of "Architectural variability Design based on Structuralism Methodology". At the same time, based on the common methodology foundation and the design intention of variability, they have developed different architectural variability design methods and patterns, which enable us to sum up the design system and train of thought through theoretical and practical analysis. And in the current social background to reposition. This paper attempts to study and discriminate the above kinds of practices through the common system frame of "Architectural variability Design based on Structuralism Methodology", and find out the basic mode of this kind of architecture in the design operation level. On the basis of synchronic and diachronic, the design system is summarized, which provides a more comprehensive reference and train of thought for the design of architectural variability under the current background. On this basis, this paper is divided into four parts, a total of six chapters. The first part (Chapter 1) describes the research background, research purpose, domestic and foreign research status, research content and framework and research significance. The second part (chapter 2 to chapter 4) examines all kinds of architectural ideas and practices from the perspectives of structuralism methodology and architectural variability, and puts forward a unified research framework and category. In this category, the typical architectural theory and practice are analyzed, compared and summarized respectively. On the basis of diachronic comparative study, we conclude that the methodology of structuralism and the design objective of architectural variability correspond to the design methodology under the architectural system. It is pointed out that the basic concept of architectural variability design is the construction mode of open infrastructure under the system of building material and function. The third part (Chapter 5) is based on the above research, corresponding to the prospect of the future under the background of the current digital architecture design. Finally, chapter 6 as a conclusion, summarizes the conclusions and shortcomings of the paper, and points out the future research direction.
【学位授予单位】：山东建筑大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：TU201

【相似文献】