拉结筋加固砌体结构抗震研究
本文选题:砌体结构 + 抗震加固 ; 参考:《北方工业大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:在我国部分村镇地区依然存在大量没有经过抗震设计的普通砖砌体房屋,一旦在地震中破坏倒塌,极大的威胁人民群众的财产生命安全。随着经济社会的发展,出现并发展了多种针对砖砌体结构的抗震加固方法,拉结筋加固是一种有效的加固方法,该方法能够减少对房屋正常使用的影响,但拉结筋加固对砖砌体结构整体性能的影响有待进一步研究。本文尝试将普通砖砌体房屋数值模拟与模型试验结果进行对比,在此基础上对拉结筋加固的砌体房屋进行全面地数值模拟研究。本文以某高校学生公寓改造工程为实例,选取该学生公寓走廊一侧两个宿舍为原型,开展了以下研究内容:1、以1:2比例缩尺建立了未采取抗震设防措施的双层双开间砖砌体房屋模型。对砖砌体试验模型进行了 6度罕遇地震作用下的拟动力试验,得到了试验模型的位移、恢复力响应;进行低周反复加载试验得到了试验模型的滞回曲线、骨架曲线和刚度退化曲线,并研究了模型裂缝开展和破坏情况。2、使用ABAQUS软件建立与试验模型尺寸一致的砖砌体结构数值模型,对其进行地震作用时程分析和低周反复加载,并将地震作用和拟静力模拟结果与试验结果进行了对比分析,验证了该模型参数及本构模型的选取。3、在ABAQUS模型基础上,模拟采用拉结筋加固的模型,通过拉结筋使轴压比分别增加0.1~0.4。对不同轴压比的加固模型进行7度罕遇地震作用下的时程分析,获得了加固模型的位移、加速度反应并进行对比;进行低周反复加载试验模拟,得到了加固模型的极限承载力、极限位移、骨架曲线和刚度退化曲线。结果表明采用拉结筋加固的砖砌体房屋在7度罕遇地震作用下抗震性能较好,加固模型比未加固房屋的极限承载力、延性有明显提升,并且随轴压比增大效果增加,增加0.2~0.3的轴压比时增强效果最为明显,增加的轴压比超过0.4时效果已不明显。
[Abstract]:There are still a large number of ordinary brick masonry buildings without seismic design in some villages and towns of our country. Once destroyed and collapsed in the earthquake, the lives of people's property are threatened greatly. With the development of economy and society, a variety of seismic reinforcement methods for brick masonry structures have emerged and developed. Tensile reinforcement is an effective reinforcement method, which can reduce the impact on the normal use of buildings. However, the effect of tensile reinforcement on the overall performance of brick masonry structure needs further study. This paper attempts to compare the numerical simulation of ordinary brick masonry building with the results of model test, and on the basis of this, makes a comprehensive numerical simulation study on the masonry building strengthened with tensile reinforcement. In this paper, two dormitories on one side of the hallway of the college apartment are selected as the prototype, taking the renovation project of a college student apartment as an example. In this paper, the following research content: 1 is carried out, and the model of double-decked brick masonry building without seismic fortification measures is set up with the 1:2 scale. The pseudo-dynamic test of brick masonry test model under the action of 6 degrees rare earthquake is carried out, and the displacement and restoring force response of the test model are obtained, and the hysteretic curve of the test model is obtained by low-cycle repeated loading test. The skeleton curve and stiffness degradation curve, and the crack development and failure of the model are studied. The numerical model of brick masonry structure consistent with the size of the test model is established by Abaqus software, and the seismic time history analysis and low cycle repeated loading are carried out on the model. The seismic action and pseudostatic simulation results are compared with the experimental results, and the parameters of the model and the selection of the constitutive model are verified. The model of tension and reinforcement is used in the simulation on the basis of Abaqus model. The axial compression ratio is increased by 0.1% and 0.4% respectively. The time history analysis of the reinforcement model with different axial compression ratio under the action of 7 degrees rare earthquake is carried out, and the displacement and acceleration responses of the reinforcement model are obtained and compared, and the ultimate bearing capacity of the strengthening model is obtained by the simulation of low cycle repeated loading test. Limit displacement, skeleton curve and stiffness degradation curve. The results show that the brick masonry buildings strengthened with tensile reinforcement have better seismic performance under the rare earthquake of 7 degrees, and the ultimate bearing capacity and ductility of the strengthening model are obviously improved than that of the unstrengthened buildings, and the effect increases with the increase of axial compression ratio. The enhancement effect is the most obvious when the axial pressure ratio of 0.2% is increased, but the effect is not obvious when the axial pressure ratio is more than 0.4.
【学位授予单位】:北方工业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:TU352.11;TU364
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘航;兰春光;华少锋;;村镇既有砌体结构抗震加固新技术研发与示范[J];世界地震工程;2014年03期
2 兰春光;班力壬;韩明杰;刘航;;后张预应力加固无构造柱砌体墙抗震性能试验[J];地震工程与工程振动;2014年S1期
3 王墩;赵海琼;吕西林;;建筑结构拟静力试验方法的加载制度[J];四川建筑科学研究;2014年03期
4 刘航;华少锋;;后张预应力加固砖砌体墙体抗震性能试验研究[J];工程抗震与加固改造;2013年05期
5 苏启旺;许浒;吴昊;张扬;刘国钦;;砖砌体结构层间位移角的探讨[J];土木工程学报;2013年S1期
6 李巨文;薄景山;卢滔;蔡晓光;张建毅;张宇东;;玉树7.1级地震学校建筑震害分析[J];自然灾害学报;2013年01期
7 杨威;朱尔玉;郝节;刘建;王满生;陈俞;;开洞砖砌体两种加固方法的抗震对比试验[J];北京交通大学学报;2013年01期
8 王文平;洪丽仙;;砌体结构优缺点及设计要点的分析[J];建筑设计管理;2012年10期
9 王萍;于江;;砌体房屋墙体加固方法研究与应用[J];江苏建筑;2011年05期
10 刘晓飞;;砌体结构房屋抗震加固方案研究[J];科学之友;2011年19期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 郑妮娜;装配式构造柱约束砌体结构抗震性能研究[D];重庆大学;2010年
2 杨春侠;混凝土多孔砖砌体结构房屋拟动力试验研究及抗震性能分析[D];湖南大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘彦志;空斗墙房屋加固及抗震性能研究[D];北方工业大学;2016年
2 董海龙;横墙承重的加固砌体房屋抗震试验研究[D];北方工业大学;2016年
3 刘杰;基于ABAQUS整体式模型下砌体结构抗震性能影响因素研究[D];湖南大学;2014年
4 华少锋;既有砖砌体结构后张预应力抗震加固技术研究[D];北京建筑大学;2013年
5 梁城宇;多层砌体结构非线性分析及抗震性能研究[D];大连理工大学;2010年
6 翁小平;空斗墙砌体数值模拟分析与抗震性能试验研究[D];浙江大学;2010年
7 马永列;结构模态分析实现方法的研究[D];浙江大学;2008年
8 何建;砌体结构房屋可靠性鉴定与加固方法及实例[D];重庆大学;2006年
9 郭昕;地震作用下多自由度结构拟动力实验方法研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2005年
10 宋力;混凝土砌块砌体基本力学性能试验研究与非线性有限元分析[D];湖南大学;2005年
,本文编号:2109191
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jianzhugongchenglunwen/2109191.html