从博弈到平衡:中西方旧城更新公众参与价值观探析

发布时间：2018-07-10 03:54

本文选题：旧城更新 + 中西方公众参与　；参考：《城市发展研究》2017年02期

【摘要】：我国公众参与理论借鉴于西方,在规划编制特别是旧城更新过程中日渐重要。但在实践中,依然表现为涉及到公共利益时被动参与、涉及到个人利益时激烈参与、总体参与渠道少等问题,致使旧城难以顺利更新,社会矛盾多发。通过对中西方旧城更新公众参与实践发展历程的梳理,发现不同社会背景下其成长机制不同,两者指导价值观和形成原因存在差异:西方公众参与"以自存促共存",体现为博弈;我国"以共存保自存",体现为注重公共利益。从价值观层面重新审视对西方公众参与理论的借鉴,确立"自存与共存平衡"的价值观,并基于这一价值观对我国旧城更新公众参与提出优化建议。
[Abstract]:The theory of public participation in our country draws lessons from the west, and becomes more and more important in planning, especially in the process of old city renewal. But in practice, there are still some problems, such as passive participation in public interest, intense participation in personal interest, lack of overall participation channels, and so on, which make it difficult to update the old city smoothly and cause frequent social contradictions. By combing the development course of the public participation in the renewal of the old cities in China and the West, it is found that the growth mechanism is different in different social backgrounds. There are differences in guiding values and forming reasons between the two: Western public participation in "promoting coexistence by self-existence" is reflected in the game, and "coexistence and self-preservation" in our country is reflected in the emphasis on public interests. This paper reexamines the western theory of public participation from the perspective of values, establishes the value of "self-existence and coexistence balance", and puts forward some suggestions for the renewal of public participation in the old cities of our country based on this value.
【作者单位】：武汉大学城市设计学院;华中科技大学建筑与城市规划学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目“基于数字技术的城市低收入阶层社会化住宅空间环境研究”(50678138)
【分类号】：TU984.114

【相似文献】