当前位置:主页 > 科技论文 > 建筑工程论文 >

基于滤纸法的黄土土—水特征曲线测试

发布时间:2018-11-11 20:01
【摘要】:非饱和土与饱和土的根本差异在于非饱和土中的孔隙水压力为负值。孔隙气压与负孔隙水压力的差值定义为基质吸力,用来体现非饱和土的应力特征。将基质吸力与土含水率的关系曲线称为土-水特征曲线(Soil-Water Characteristic Curve),简称SWCC。SWCC是非饱和土的一个重要本构关系,可以用来分析和预测土的变形、强度和渗透性,因此SWCC是非饱和土研究的基础。基质吸力测试方法较多,其中滤纸法最为快捷、简便且量程大。本文取陕西泾阳L1和L5黄土样,在ASTM D5298-10的基础上,研究滤纸法测试基质吸力的操作过程,重点对土样的制备和试验条件、滤纸的称量、平衡时间等关键步骤进行分析和改进,将测试结果与其他方法进行对比,主要结论有:1)实验密封条件采用锡纸包裹并蜡封的方法代替ASTM D5298-10推荐的密封罐,解决了密封罐易造成密封不严及取放土样不便的问题,密封结果更为理想;2)由铝盒或者保鲜袋为滤纸的容器称量滤纸改为直接将滤纸放在天平托盘上称量,提高了称量滤纸的精度;3)对于同一种土,多组环刀联合测试与只采用一组环刀测试相比,更易于操作,且减小了操作过程中的误差;4)土样与滤纸的水势平衡时间与土样的干密度关系小,与土样的含水率关系较大,含水率越大平衡时间越短,反之,平衡时间越长,对于泾阳L1和L5黄土,土样含水率小于5%时,建议平衡时间13天以上;土样含水率介于5%~20%之间,建议平衡时间为10天以上;含水率大于20%时,建议平衡时间为5天以上;5)分别采用Gardner模型、Van Genuchten模型和FredlundXing模型对滤纸法所获基质吸力及土样实际含水率进行SWCC拟合,FredlundXing模型拟合度最高;6)通过将已有采用张力计、压力板仪、压力膜仪、渗析法及滤纸法等测得的黄土SWCC与本文滤纸法测试结果对比,证明本文推荐的方法和所测试的结果可靠性高且在全基质吸力范围内均较为适用。
[Abstract]:The fundamental difference between unsaturated soil and saturated soil is that the pore water pressure in unsaturated soil is negative. The difference between pore pressure and negative pore water pressure is defined as matrix suction, which is used to reflect the stress characteristics of unsaturated soil. The relation curve between matrix suction and soil moisture content is called the soil-water characteristic curve (Soil-Water Characteristic Curve), which is an important constitutive relation of unsaturated soil. It can be used to analyze and predict the deformation, strength and permeability of soil. Therefore, SWCC is the basis of unsaturated soil research. There are many methods of matrix suction measurement, among which filter paper method is the most rapid, simple and has a large measuring range. On the basis of ASTM D5298-10, the operating process of filter paper method for measuring the suction of the matrix was studied, and the preparation and test conditions of the soil samples, the weighing of filter paper, were studied in this paper, taking the loess samples of Jingyang, Shaanxi Province, as well as the L _ 5 loess samples, and based on ASTM D5298-10. The key steps, such as balance time, are analyzed and improved, and the test results are compared with other methods. The main conclusions are as follows: 1) the experimental sealing conditions are replaced by the seal tank recommended by ASTM D5298-10. The problem that the sealing tank is easy to be sealed and the soil sample is not easy to be taken is solved, and the sealing result is more ideal. 2) the weighing filter paper is changed from the container weighing filter paper of aluminum box or fresh-keeping bag to the weighing paper directly on the balance tray, which improves the accuracy of weighing filter paper; 3) for the same soil, it is easier to operate and the error in the operation process is reduced compared with that of using only one group of ring knives. 4) the water potential equilibrium time of soil sample and filter paper has little relationship with dry density of soil sample, and has a greater relation with soil sample moisture content. The larger the water content is, the shorter the equilibrium time is, otherwise, the longer the equilibrium time is, the longer the balance time is, and the longer the balance time is, the longer the balance time is for Jingyang L1 and L5 loess. When the moisture content of soil sample is less than 5, it is suggested that the balance time be more than 13 days. The water content of soil sample is between 5% and 20%, and the suggested equilibrium time is more than 10 days, and when the moisture content is more than 20, the suggested equilibrium time is more than 5 days. 5) Gardner model, Van Genuchten model and FredlundXing model were used to fit the matrix suction and soil sample moisture content obtained by filter paper method respectively. FredlundXing model had the highest fitting degree. 6) the SWCC of loess measured by tension meter, pressure plate instrument, pressure film meter, dialysis method and filter paper method are compared with the results of filter paper method in this paper. It is proved that the proposed method and the measured results are reliable and applicable in the whole matrix suction range.
【学位授予单位】:长安大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:TU444

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 侯晓坤;翟张辉;晁建红;张常亮;李萍;李同录;;黄土非饱和湿陷变形的计算模型[J];水文地质工程地质;2016年03期

2 刘朋飞;殷跃平;李滨;孙一博;;非饱和黄土干湿循环土水特征曲线试验及渗透系数预测[J];中国地质灾害与防治学报;2015年04期

3 郑娟;赵丽娅;刘保健;;非饱和黄土的土水特征曲线试验研究[J];南水北调与水利科技;2015年06期

4 杨益彪;詹良通;王顺玉;陈云敏;赵云飞;;封顶覆盖黄土气体渗透特性测试及填埋气一维运移分析[J];岩土力学;2015年07期

5 袁志辉;倪万魁;刘茹;李焕焕;;基于吸应力的非饱和黄土抗剪强度研究[J];合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版);2015年05期

6 黄志全;岳康兴;李幻;李磊;;滤纸法测定非饱和膨胀土土水特征曲线试验[J];南水北调与水利科技;2015年03期

7 许淑珍;白晓红;马富丽;;利用MATLAB拟合压实黄土土水特征曲线的研究[J];太原理工大学学报;2015年01期

8 吴义高;孙德安;;淮安膨胀土的土水特性[J];上海大学学报(自然科学版);2014年02期

9 邵恩庆;张虎元;孔应德;;兰州地区垃圾填埋场黄土腾发盖层降水入渗模拟[J];环境工程学报;2014年03期

10 褚峰;邵生俊;陈存礼;;干密度和竖向应力对原状非饱和黄土土水特征影响的试验研究[J];岩石力学与工程学报;2014年02期

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 赵彦旭;压实黄土增湿变形的非饱和土力学研究[D];兰州大学;2010年

2 金旭;非饱和原状土土—水特征曲线及本构模型的研究[D];北京交通大学;2010年

相关硕士学位论文 前8条

1 孙钊;非饱和定边黄土渗透冲蚀试验研究[D];长安大学;2015年

2 刘蒙蒙;泾阳县南塬黄土边坡渗透系数变异性分析[D];长安大学;2015年

3 刘茹;基于土-水特征曲线的黄土压缩特性试验研究[D];长安大学;2014年

4 江耀;非饱和黄土特征曲线的研究[D];兰州大学;2012年

5 刘新华;黄土状填土应力相关的土水特征曲线及其强度[D];太原理工大学;2012年

6 周冬;应力作用下非饱和土土水特征曲线及渗透性研究[D];西安理工大学;2010年

7 张昭;非饱和土的渗透函数试验研究及其应用[D];西安理工大学;2009年

8 卢靖;非饱和黄土水分迁移问题的试验研究[D];西安建筑科技大学;2006年



本文编号:2325977

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jianzhugongchenglunwen/2325977.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户9caac***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com