基于层次分析法和语义差别法的北京运河公园使用状况评价
发布时间：2019-05-22 05:17
【摘要】：随着京杭大运河于2014年6月成功入选世界文化遗产名录,运河沿线丰富的景观资源越来越受到人们的重视,城市运河公园作为运河景观的主要代表类型,在承担着城市公园的基础使用功能的同时,立足于运河独特的生态景观资源和历史文化资源。开展城市运河公园的研究,对于运河生态环境资源的保护和运河文化的传承有着积极的作用。本文以京杭大运河北京通州段的通州运河公园和大运河森林公园为例,对其使用状况进行综合评价研究,对北京运河公园以及运河沿线其他公园的规划建设、景观提升以及发展研究,具有一定参考和指导价值。(1)本文通过进行文档文献阅读和对北京运河公园进行实地调研及人物访谈的形式,对北京运河公园进行定性分析研究,从而较为构建出北京运河公园的使用状况评价指标体系,以北京运河公园使用状况综合评价为目标,选取历史文化要素、生态景观要素、社会管理要素、游憩交通要素为一级指标,以地域文化独特性、文化内涵体现性、科普教育丰富度等十五个指标为二级指标,构建了北京运河公园使用状况评价指标体系。(2)通过向城市规划、景观生态学等专家发放征询问卷的方式,对专家的打分结果运用层次分析法进行数据分析,得到各个评价指标的判断矩阵,从而计算出各个评价指标间的相对重要程度排序,即权重值,要素层各评价指标的相对重要程度排序为生态景观要素(0.523) 游憩交通要素(0.299) 历史文化要素(0.121) 社会管理要素(0.0565);因子层各评价指标的相对重要程度排序为水体视觉印象(0.2737) 外部交通可达性(0.1715) 景观层次美感度(0.1566) 内部交通便捷性(0.0775) 文化内涵体现性(0.0726) 植物种类丰富性(0.0633) 地域文化特性(0.0363) 空间布局合理性(0.0347) ＞公共服务设施完善度(0.0328) ＞空气环境质量(0.0296) 游憩舒适性(0.0157) 治安管理状况(0.0134) 科普教育丰富性(0.0121) 公园卫生条件(0.0073) 设施养护管理(0.003)。(3)运用问卷调查的方式,对通州运河公园和大运河森林公园进行使用者满意度调查,通过对两个公园的基础信息部分问卷的分析,得出通州运河公园和大运河森林公园的基本现状;通过对语义差别部分调查问卷的分析,运用语义差别法进行数据计算,得到通州运河公园评价体系指标的满意度平均赋值,如地域文化特性(0.981)、文化内涵体现性(0.856)、科普教育丰富性(0.904)、植物种类丰富性(1.385)、景观层次美感度(1.572)等;得到大运河森林公园评价体系指标的满意度平均赋值如地域文化特性(0.433)、文化内涵体现性(0.705)、科普教育丰富性(0.891)、植物种类丰富性(1.376)、景观层次美感度(1.547)等。(4)通过将通州运河公园和大运河森林公园的使用状况评价指标的权重值和满意度平均赋值进行综合计算,结合层次分析法和语义差别法两种量化方法,将专家的相对重要性分析和使用者的满意度分析结果相结合,得出通州运河公园的最终综合评价得分D=78.333,满意度综合评价得分V=77.396,可知通州运河公园使用状况综合评价结果为较好;得出大运河森林公园的最终综合评价得分D=79.774,大运河森林公园满意度综合评价得分V=77.796,可知大运河森林公园使用状况综合评价结果为较好。(5)对通州运河公园和大运河森林公园的各个评价指标满意度进行对比分析,得出北京运河公园的整体评价结果均较好,公园的景观层次美感度、植物种类丰富度和游憩舒适性整体较好,公园的水体视觉印象、治安管理状况、公园卫生条件整体较差,而地域文化特性、文化内涵体现性、科普教育丰富性等方面整体较为一般。(6)根据北京运河公园的综合评价及对比分析结果,对北京运河公园的未来规划建设给予以下优化建议,建议应加强园区治安管理,提高园内卫生水平;找寻通州地域文化特点,深化运河文化内涵;保护运河历史遗迹,增加科普教育体验活动;整治运河水质,净化园内空气环境质量;增强公园外部交通可达性,提升内部交通便捷性;调整园区内空间的格局,提升公园的游憩舒适度。通过本文的研究,对北京运河公园进行使用状况综合评价,为运河公园的研究提供了参考作用,从而对“后世界遗产时代”的运河公园发展,起到了积极的促进作用。
[Abstract]:With the success of the Grand Canal of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal in the World Heritage List in June 2014, the rich landscape resources along the canal are becoming more and more important, and the city canal park is the main representative type of the canal landscape, and at the same time as the basic use function of the city park, It is based on the unique ecological landscape resources and historical and cultural resources of the canal. The research of the city canal park has a positive effect on the protection of the canal ecological environment and the inheritance of the canal culture. Taking the Tongzhou Canal Park and Grand Canal Forest Park in the Tongzhou section of Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal as an example, this paper makes a comprehensive evaluation of its use situation, and studies the planning and construction of the Beijing Canal Park and other parks along the canal, the improvement of the landscape and the development of the Grand Canal Forest Park. And has certain reference and guiding value. (1) The paper makes a qualitative analysis of the Beijing Canal Park by carrying out the document reading and the field investigation and the character interview of the Beijing Canal Park, so as to construct the evaluation index system of the use condition of the Beijing Canal Park. Taking the comprehensive evaluation of the use condition of the Beijing Canal Park as the target, selecting the historical and cultural elements, the ecological landscape elements, the social management elements and the recreation and traffic elements as the first-level indicators, and taking the fifteen indexes such as the regional cultural uniqueness, the cultural connotation and the popularization of the science popularization education as the secondary indexes, The evaluation index system of the use condition of the Beijing Canal Park is constructed. and (2) carrying out data analysis on the scoring result of the experts by using a hierarchical analysis method to obtain a judgment matrix of each evaluation index through the method of issuing a consultation questionnaire to experts such as urban planning, landscape ecology and the like, so as to calculate the relative importance degree between each evaluation index, namely, the weight value and the relative importance degree of each evaluation index of the element layer are ranked as the ecological landscape element (0.523), the recreation traffic element (0.299) historical and cultural element (0.121) social management element (0.121), and the social management element (0.0565); The relative importance of each evaluation index of the factor layer is ranked as the visual impression of the water body (0.2737), the external traffic accessibility (0.1715), the aesthetic degree of the landscape level (0.1566), the interior traffic convenience (0.0775), the cultural connotation (0.0726), the richness of the plant species (0.0633) and the spatial layout of the regional cultural characteristic (0.0363). Rationality (0.0347)> Public Service Facilities (0.0328)> Air Quality (0.0296) Recreational Comfort (0.0157) Public Security (0.0134) Public Security (0.0121) Park Sanitary Conditions (0.0073) Facilities Maintenance Management (0.003). (3) The survey of user's satisfaction is carried out in Tongzhou Canal Park and Grand Canal Forest Park by means of the questionnaire, and the basic status of Tongzhou Canal Park and Grand Canal Forest Park is obtained through the analysis of the basic information part questionnaire of two parks; By means of the analysis of the semantic difference part questionnaire, the data calculation is carried out by means of the semantic difference method, and the average value of the satisfaction degree of the index of the evaluation system of the Tongzhou Canal Park is obtained, such as the regional cultural property (0.981), the cultural connotation (0.856) and the abundance of the popular science education (0.904). The diversity of the plant species (1.385), the aesthetic degree of the landscape (1.572) and so on; the average value of the satisfaction of the evaluation system of the Grand Canal Forest Park, such as the regional cultural identity (0.433), the cultural connotation (0.705), the richness of the popular science education (0.891), the richness of the plant species (1.376), The aesthetic degree of landscape level (1.547) and so on. and (4) carrying out comprehensive calculation on the weight value and the satisfaction average value of the utilization condition evaluation index of the Tongzhou Canal Park and the Grand Canal Forest Park, and combining the two quantitative methods of the hierarchical analysis method and the semantic difference method, Based on the analysis of the relative importance of the experts and the results of the user's satisfaction analysis, the final comprehensive evaluation score of Tongzhou Canal Park is D = 78.333, and the score of satisfaction comprehensive evaluation (V = 77.396), and it can be found that the comprehensive evaluation result of the use condition of Tongzhou Canal Park is good; The final comprehensive evaluation score of the Grand Canal Forest Park is D = 79.774, and the comprehensive evaluation score of the Grand Canal Forest Park is V = 77.796. It can be found that the comprehensive evaluation result of the use condition of the Grand Canal Forest Park is good. (5) The overall evaluation results of the Grand Canal Park and the Grand Canal Forest Park are compared and analyzed, and the overall evaluation results of the Beijing Canal Park are good, the landscape level of the park is good, the diversity of the plant species and the recreation comfort are better, The visual impression of the water body in the park, the situation of public security administration, the overall poor sanitation of the park, and the characteristics of the regional culture, the cultural connotation and the richness of popular science education are more and more general. (6) According to the comprehensive evaluation of the Beijing Canal Park and the results of the comparative analysis, the following optimization suggestions are given to the future planning and construction of the Beijing Canal Park, and it is suggested that the public security management of the park should be strengthened, the health level of the park should be improved, the regional cultural characteristics of Tongzhou should be found, and the cultural connotation of the canal should be deepened; To protect the historical sites of the canal and to increase the experience of the popularization of science education; to improve the water quality of the canal, to purify the air quality in the garden, to enhance the accessibility of the outside traffic of the park, to improve the convenience of internal transportation, to adjust the pattern of the space in the park and to improve the recreation comfort of the park. Through the research of this paper, the comprehensive evaluation of the use situation of the Beijing Canal Park, which provides a reference for the research of the canal park, has played an active role in the development of the "the post-World Heritage Times" 's canal park.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：TU986.5
本文编号：2482709
[Abstract]:With the success of the Grand Canal of the Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal in the World Heritage List in June 2014, the rich landscape resources along the canal are becoming more and more important, and the city canal park is the main representative type of the canal landscape, and at the same time as the basic use function of the city park, It is based on the unique ecological landscape resources and historical and cultural resources of the canal. The research of the city canal park has a positive effect on the protection of the canal ecological environment and the inheritance of the canal culture. Taking the Tongzhou Canal Park and Grand Canal Forest Park in the Tongzhou section of Beijing-Hangzhou Grand Canal as an example, this paper makes a comprehensive evaluation of its use situation, and studies the planning and construction of the Beijing Canal Park and other parks along the canal, the improvement of the landscape and the development of the Grand Canal Forest Park. And has certain reference and guiding value. (1) The paper makes a qualitative analysis of the Beijing Canal Park by carrying out the document reading and the field investigation and the character interview of the Beijing Canal Park, so as to construct the evaluation index system of the use condition of the Beijing Canal Park. Taking the comprehensive evaluation of the use condition of the Beijing Canal Park as the target, selecting the historical and cultural elements, the ecological landscape elements, the social management elements and the recreation and traffic elements as the first-level indicators, and taking the fifteen indexes such as the regional cultural uniqueness, the cultural connotation and the popularization of the science popularization education as the secondary indexes, The evaluation index system of the use condition of the Beijing Canal Park is constructed. and (2) carrying out data analysis on the scoring result of the experts by using a hierarchical analysis method to obtain a judgment matrix of each evaluation index through the method of issuing a consultation questionnaire to experts such as urban planning, landscape ecology and the like, so as to calculate the relative importance degree between each evaluation index, namely, the weight value and the relative importance degree of each evaluation index of the element layer are ranked as the ecological landscape element (0.523), the recreation traffic element (0.299) historical and cultural element (0.121) social management element (0.121), and the social management element (0.0565); The relative importance of each evaluation index of the factor layer is ranked as the visual impression of the water body (0.2737), the external traffic accessibility (0.1715), the aesthetic degree of the landscape level (0.1566), the interior traffic convenience (0.0775), the cultural connotation (0.0726), the richness of the plant species (0.0633) and the spatial layout of the regional cultural characteristic (0.0363). Rationality (0.0347)> Public Service Facilities (0.0328)> Air Quality (0.0296) Recreational Comfort (0.0157) Public Security (0.0134) Public Security (0.0121) Park Sanitary Conditions (0.0073) Facilities Maintenance Management (0.003). (3) The survey of user's satisfaction is carried out in Tongzhou Canal Park and Grand Canal Forest Park by means of the questionnaire, and the basic status of Tongzhou Canal Park and Grand Canal Forest Park is obtained through the analysis of the basic information part questionnaire of two parks; By means of the analysis of the semantic difference part questionnaire, the data calculation is carried out by means of the semantic difference method, and the average value of the satisfaction degree of the index of the evaluation system of the Tongzhou Canal Park is obtained, such as the regional cultural property (0.981), the cultural connotation (0.856) and the abundance of the popular science education (0.904). The diversity of the plant species (1.385), the aesthetic degree of the landscape (1.572) and so on; the average value of the satisfaction of the evaluation system of the Grand Canal Forest Park, such as the regional cultural identity (0.433), the cultural connotation (0.705), the richness of the popular science education (0.891), the richness of the plant species (1.376), The aesthetic degree of landscape level (1.547) and so on. and (4) carrying out comprehensive calculation on the weight value and the satisfaction average value of the utilization condition evaluation index of the Tongzhou Canal Park and the Grand Canal Forest Park, and combining the two quantitative methods of the hierarchical analysis method and the semantic difference method, Based on the analysis of the relative importance of the experts and the results of the user's satisfaction analysis, the final comprehensive evaluation score of Tongzhou Canal Park is D = 78.333, and the score of satisfaction comprehensive evaluation (V = 77.396), and it can be found that the comprehensive evaluation result of the use condition of Tongzhou Canal Park is good; The final comprehensive evaluation score of the Grand Canal Forest Park is D = 79.774, and the comprehensive evaluation score of the Grand Canal Forest Park is V = 77.796. It can be found that the comprehensive evaluation result of the use condition of the Grand Canal Forest Park is good. (5) The overall evaluation results of the Grand Canal Park and the Grand Canal Forest Park are compared and analyzed, and the overall evaluation results of the Beijing Canal Park are good, the landscape level of the park is good, the diversity of the plant species and the recreation comfort are better, The visual impression of the water body in the park, the situation of public security administration, the overall poor sanitation of the park, and the characteristics of the regional culture, the cultural connotation and the richness of popular science education are more and more general. (6) According to the comprehensive evaluation of the Beijing Canal Park and the results of the comparative analysis, the following optimization suggestions are given to the future planning and construction of the Beijing Canal Park, and it is suggested that the public security management of the park should be strengthened, the health level of the park should be improved, the regional cultural characteristics of Tongzhou should be found, and the cultural connotation of the canal should be deepened; To protect the historical sites of the canal and to increase the experience of the popularization of science education; to improve the water quality of the canal, to purify the air quality in the garden, to enhance the accessibility of the outside traffic of the park, to improve the convenience of internal transportation, to adjust the pattern of the space in the park and to improve the recreation comfort of the park. Through the research of this paper, the comprehensive evaluation of the use situation of the Beijing Canal Park, which provides a reference for the research of the canal park, has played an active role in the development of the "the post-World Heritage Times" 's canal park.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：TU986.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱建新,李中秋,毕经宝;层次分析法在环保设备故障诊断中的应用[J];交通环保;1991年04期
2 林琳;林敏慧;;中山大学南校区校前区空间特征分析及建议[J];现代城市研究;2008年07期
3 李滨,张敏中;基于层次分析法的汽车系统分析[J];江苏理工大学学报(自然科学版);2000年04期
4 隋学深,高长元;层次分析法在通信企业考评运营指标中的应用[J];哈尔滨商业大学学报(自然科学版);2003年02期
5 吕跃进,覃菊莹;层次分析法建模中的结构问题[J];广西大学学报(自然科学版);2003年S2期
6 魏仁干,李敏;层次分析法在汽车零部件客户价值评估中的应用[J];商场现代化;2005年17期
7 孙冬,宋娜娜,刘巍;基于层次分析法解决消费者购车问题[J];河南机电高等专科学校学报;2005年01期
8 吴哲敏;梁海霞;;改进的层次分析法在大学生厌学分析中的应用[J];武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版);2006年01期
9 沈剑;吕文元;;层次分析法在大型医疗设备选购中的应用[J];中国设备工程;2007年02期
10 杨振华;郝金鹏;;横糊层次分析法在设备采购中的应用[J];河南水利与南水北调;2007年03期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 田平;孙宏才;徐关尧;;关于AHP与ANP的比较和分析[A];决策科学与评价——中国系统工程学会决策科学专业委员会第八届学术年会论文集[C];2009年
2 金式容;;层次分析法在评估区域可持续发展中的应用[A];系统工程与可持续发展战略——中国系统工程学会第十届年会论文集[C];1998年
3 金菊良;魏一鸣;付强;丁晶;;计算层次分析法中排序权值的新方法[A];2001年中国管理科学学术会议论文集[C];2001年
4 陈会祥;黄德寅;张倩;;层次分析法在职业健康风险管理中的应用研究[A];风险分析和危机反应的创新理论和方法——中国灾害防御协会风险分析专业委员会第五届年会论文集[C];2012年
5 赵菊花;;浅谈层次分析法在科技项目管理中的应用[A];2012管理创新、智能科技与经济发展研讨会论文集[C];2012年
6 林鹏程;;层次分析法在设备评标过程中的应用[A];上海空港（第5辑）[C];2007年
7 骆正清;;基于聚类与合并算法的层次分析法[A];Well-off Society Strategies and Systems Engineering--Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of System Engineering Society of China[C];2004年
8 王铁成;李新华;;改进的层次分析法在重大建设工程项目风险识别中的应用[A];中国灾害防御协会风险分析专业委员会第二届年会论文集（一）[C];2006年
9 陈孝文;;层次分析法在比质比价采购中的应用研究[A];湖北省烟草学会2006年学术年会论文集[C];2006年
10 靳文生;郝世强;;层次分析法在应对整车项目研发风险中的应用[A];西南汽车信息：2013年第9期（总第330期）[C];2013年
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 中海油能源发展股份有限公司 王晓峰;层次分析法在石油企业风险评估中的应用探究[N];中国会计报;2012年
2 本报记者 徐蔚冰;中国总部企业国际影响力不断提升[N];中国经济时报;2014年
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 张小琳;基于修正层次分析法的我国石油贸易风险问题研究[D];对外经济贸易大学;2014年
2 蔡桦杨;基于临床病例和层次分析法的中医临床实践指南应用评价研究[D];广州中医药大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 代嘉冕;基于层次分析法和语义差别法的北京运河公园使用状况评价[D];沈阳农业大学;2017年
2 陈卓;基于层次分析法的海上油气田节能评价体系研究[D];北京建筑大学;2015年
3 张玉杰;政府公共财政绩效审计研究[D];河北大学;2015年
4 崔恩泽;层次分析法在工程招投标中的应用研究[D];山东建筑大学;2015年
5 刘长鑫;基于层次分析法的远程教学质量评价体系研究[D];渤海大学;2015年
6 赵海云;K市市级统建“弃土消纳场”社会管理方引进选择评价研究[D];昆明理工大学;2015年
7 韩静;杨凌热电厂工程农业生态环境影响评价[D];西北农林科技大学;2015年
8 张飞;微店网电子商务模式的风险分析与评价[D];西安建筑科技大学;2015年
9 Martin AkelimbonaAtebiya（马丁）;加纳矿业投资环境评价[D];中国地质大学(北京);2015年
10 吕杰;交叉桥梁与被交运营公路施工安全评估研究[D];长安大学;2015年
，本文编号：2482709
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jianzhugongchenglunwen/2482709.html
