RC连梁损伤控制试验与分析研究
[Abstract]:As the main anti-lateral force component in the shear wall system, the continuous beam is the key to ensure the overall seismic performance of the structure. In particular, once the damage occurs, the concrete connecting beam is difficult to repair, and the requirement of the modern seismic engineering to the function recoverability is difficult to realize. In order to improve the seismic toughness of the shear wall structure system, the energy dissipation and shock-absorbing device is put into the continuous beam, and the seismic performance of the continuous beam can be effectively improved by utilizing the good energy dissipation capability of the energy dissipation device. In this paper, nine RC beam-beam tests are carried out, and the effect of the cross-height ratio, the cross-diagonal bar and the floor slab on the seismic performance of the continuous beam is studied. The results show that the RC beams are both bent and yielding, but the ultimate failure mode is still the shear failure and the bending shear failure. The cross-inclined rib can improve the shear bearing capacity of the continuous beam by more than 20%, and the slab has little influence on the shear-bearing capacity of the connecting beam; the cross-inclined rib and the floor slab can improve the bending yield bearing capacity of the connecting beam, but have no obvious contribution to the limit deformation capability of the connecting beam. The initial effective bending stiffness of the continuous beam is in the range of 0.24 EIg to 0.3EIg, the effective bending stiffness at the time of yield is about 0.15 EIg, the effective bending stiffness of the continuous beam is greater than the specification value, and as the loading displacement is increased, the continuous beam and the floor part are damaged after the earthquake, which is not conducive to the post-earthquake use or repair. In order to control the damage of RC beam, a kind of energy dissipation and connecting beam with joint steel damper is proposed in this paper, and four test pieces with the same cross-height ratio as RC beam are completed, and the final failure mode includes two kinds of rupture and anchoring failure of the bending unit of the damper. In the break-up mode of the bending unit, the super-strong coefficient of the damper reaches 2.5. The error of the initial stiffness test value of the damper and the design value error is within 15%, and the error reason includes the deformation of the anchoring part, the bolt slip and the non-coordination of the deformation between the dampers, etc. The energy dissipation capacity of the energy dissipation and connecting beam at the same span is greater than that of the RC beam, the deformation and energy consumption of the damper account for about 80% of the energy dissipation and connecting beam, and the crack development of the concrete part and the floor slab can be effectively controlled, and the damper can be quickly replaced after the test. In this paper, a simplified numerical model of energy dissipation continuous beam is proposed, and the mechanical behavior of the damper and the bending and shearing of the concrete connecting beam are simulated by a simplified method, and the coordination unit is added between the dampers to simulate the deformation incoordination between groups of dampers. The simulation results of the ultimate bearing capacity and the accumulated energy consumption of the energy dissipation and connecting beam are within 10% of the experimental results, and the error of the initial stiffness simulation results is more than 20%, due to the difference between the test boundary conditions and the numerical simulation boundary conditions. The key parameters _ span ratio, deformation ratio and strength ratio of the yield bearing capacity and the stiffness of the damper are further analyzed. The results show that the value of too high or too low is unfavorable to the bearing capacity of the continuous beam, the energy dissipation capacity and the angle of the damper entering the yield. It is suggested that the three parameters are selected in the range of 0.3-0.4, 0.6-0.7 and 0.6-0.7, respectively.
【学位授予单位】:中国地震局工程力学研究所
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:TU352.11;TU375
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 徐培福;黄吉锋;陈富盛;;近50年剪力墙结构震害及其对抗震设计的启示[J];建筑结构学报;2017年03期
2 师骁;王彦栋;曲哲;纪晓东;;含摩擦阻尼器钢连梁的往复加载试验[J];工程力学;2016年S1期
3 项远辉;蒋欢军;;改善小跨高比连梁抗震性能方法研究综述[J];结构工程师;2016年01期
4 纪晓东;王彦栋;马琦峰;钱稼茹;;可更换钢连梁抗震性能试验研究[J];建筑结构学报;2015年10期
5 孔子昂;王涛;施唯;;带缝钢板阻尼器受力性能试验研究[J];土木工程学报;2015年09期
6 周颖;缪驰;闫峰;刘晴云;;钢骨混凝土连梁联肢剪力墙抗震性能试验研究及有限元分析[J];建筑结构学报;2015年03期
7 施唯;王涛;孔子昂;毛晨曦;;消能连梁子结构试验研究[J];地震工程与工程振动;2014年S1期
8 纪晓东;马琦峰;王彦栋;钱稼茹;;钢连梁可更换消能梁段抗震性能试验研究[J];建筑结构学报;2014年06期
9 聂建国;胡红松;;外包钢板-混凝土组合连梁试验研究(Ⅰ):抗震性能[J];建筑结构学报;2014年05期
10 吕西林;陈云;蒋欢军;;可更换连梁保险丝抗震性能试验研究[J];同济大学学报(自然科学版);2013年09期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 孔子昂;组合连梁RC框剪结构地震损伤控制研究[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2016年
2 皮天祥;钢筋混凝土剪力墙小跨高比连梁抗震性能试验和设计方法研究[D];重庆大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 孙亚;带可更换钢连梁的混合联肢剪力墙抗震性能研究[D];清华大学;2015年
2 施唯;钢筋混凝土连梁的破坏机制与损伤控制研究[D];中国地震局工程力学研究所;2015年
3 张刚;钢板混凝土连梁抗震性能的试验研究[D];清华大学;2005年
,本文编号:2502428
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jianzhugongchenglunwen/2502428.html