洪业与二三十年代中国现代学术的转型——以燕京大学、哈佛燕京学社为中心的考察

发布时间：2018-01-31 01:04

本文关键词： 洪业哈佛燕京学社学术转型　出处：《浙江社会科学》2010年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：国人论学,常常不能分清思想与学术的畛域,而将社会影响与学术贡献等同视之。所谓"学术思想史",究竟哪些是学术,哪些是思想,似乎不易截然分清,但区分思想史和学术史的思路,对于深入梳理20世纪上半叶的学术转型应该很有必要。本文以区分思想史和学术史的思路为前提,纳入高等教育与海外汉学等宏观视角,借助成立于二十年代的哈佛燕京学社这一学术机构,以洪业为中心,把哈佛燕京学社、燕京大学、国学研究、《燕京学报》、中外交流等放在一起加以观照,讨论民国时期不以思想论争名世而以学术积累见长的学者,聚焦于其学术背景和学术贡献,以呈现出民国时期学术转型的另一面。
[Abstract]:Chinese theorists often fail to distinguish the boundaries of thought and scholarship, but equate social influence with academic contribution. The so-called "history of academic thought" does not seem to distinguish exactly what is academic and what is thought. However, it is necessary to distinguish the history of thought from the history of learning for the first half of 20th century. This paper is based on the idea of distinguishing the history of thought from the history of learning. From the macro perspective of higher education and overseas Sinology, with the help of the Harvard Yanjing academic Society, which was established in 20s, taking Hong Ye as the center, the research of Harvard Yenching Society, Yenching University and Sinology is put forward. "Journal of Yanjing", Chinese and foreign exchanges and so on put together to study, the discussion of the period of the Republic of China is not famous for ideological controversy and academic accumulation of scholars, focusing on its academic background and academic contributions. In order to show the period of the Republic of China academic transformation on the other side.
【作者单位】：北京大学;华东师范大学中文系;
【分类号】：C092
【正文快照】： 回顾百年学术进程,无论是回到学案式的以人物为中心,还是专注于梳理观念和思潮的激荡变迁,都只是揭示了20世纪现代学术之建立的某些面相。这些研究虽各有其深造自得之处,也还涵盖不了民国时期学术转型的复杂过程。因此,关于这一话题,在不同的视角下,还仍有继续讨论的余地。国

【共引文献】