国学现代化与中国哲学史——几个方法论问题

发布时间：2018-03-25 20:22

本文选题：国学　切入点：现代化　出处：《孔子研究》2007年02期

【摘要】：在“国学”现代化的课题中,“国学”与中国哲学史的关系,是应该予以深入研究的方法论问题。国学以经典文本“六艺”和诸子文献为基础与前提。不断用新的时代精神和学术眼光,吸收综合新的学术思想资源,对“文本”进行新诠释,是“国学”能具有生命力的必备条件。历代的“国学”都是如此作的。这些诠释,有两种形式,一种是如冯友兰的中国哲学及中国哲学史,一种是如章太炎及钱穆的《国学概论》。两者各有所长,亦各有所短。比较两者的长短得失,能使新“国学”从中吸取教益。就时代精神言,新“国学”应具体、深入地突显中国文化或哲学的四点根本精神,即:唤起士的人格自尊和社会担当的精神,认为人的本质在于文化、在于礼乐的人文精神,崇尚创
[Abstract]:In the subject of the modernization of "Chinese culture", the relationship between "Chinese culture" and the history of Chinese philosophy, It is a methodological problem that should be studied in depth. The study of Chinese Classics is based on the classical texts "six Arts" and the literature of the philosophers, and constantly absorbs new academic thought resources with the new spirit of the times and academic vision. A new interpretation of "text" is a necessary condition for the vitality of "Sinology". This is what has been done in the past dynasties. There are two forms of interpretation, one is Feng Youlan's Chinese philosophy and the history of Chinese philosophy. One is Zhang Taiyan and Qian Mu's "introduction to Chinese Culture". The two have their own strengths and weaknesses. Comparing the advantages and disadvantages of the two can draw lessons from the new "Chinese culture". In terms of the spirit of the times, the new "Chinese culture" should be specific. The four fundamental spirits of Chinese culture or philosophy are deeply highlighted, that is, to arouse the personality self-esteem of scholars and the spirit of social responsibility, and to think that the essence of human beings lies in culture, in the humanistic spirit of etiquette and music, and in advocating creativity.
【作者单位】：
【分类号】：B26;K207.8

【相似文献】