难以区分的新旧:民初国学派别的异与同

发布时间：2018-04-27 19:26

本文选题：国学 + 国故学　；参考：《四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2001年06期

【摘要】：在民初趋新学者的认知中 ,2 0世纪 2 0年代的国学机构有三类 ,即赛先生的“国学”、冬烘先生的“国学”和神怪先生的“国学” ,分别以北京大学国学研究所、无锡国学专修馆和上海同善社的国学专修馆为代表 ,前者总试图区分于后二者。但当时还有一些较难纳入这三类的国学机构 ,比如东南大学的国学研究院就与北大国学研究所异中有同。而更年少的新人物甚至连北大派国学也不予承认 ,他们认为治国学者皆不“科学”。与趋新学人意愿相反的是 ,由于各类国学机构研究的对象接近 ,整理国故客观上多少起到了沟通新旧的作用 ;但新派对旧派有意识的排拒远胜于基本是无意识的沟通 ,“国学”一名终于不立 ,不得不在反对声中逐渐淡出
[Abstract]:There are three kinds of Chinese studies institutions in the early 1920s, namely, the "Chinese studies" of Mr. Sai, the "national studies" of Mr. Dongwei and the "Chinese studies" of Mr. Shenwei, respectively, in the early days of the Republic of China. Wuxi Guoxue Special School is the representative of Shanghai Tongshan Society, the former always tries to distinguish the latter two. At that time, however, there were still some institutions which were difficult to incorporate into these three groups. For example, the Institute of Chinese Studies at Southeast University was different from the Institute of Chinese Studies at Peking University. Even the younger Chinese did not even recognize the Peking University School of Chinese Studies, which said that governing scholars were not "scientific." Contrary to the will of the scholars, because of the close relationship between the research subjects of various kinds of Chinese studies institutions, sorting out the country's reasons objectively plays a role in communicating between the new and the old, but the conscious rejection of the old and the new parties is far better than the basic unintentional communication. One of the "Chinese Studies" finally failed to stand up and had to fade out in opposition.
【作者单位】：四川大学历史文化学院
【分类号】：K092

【参考文献】